Концептуальные ракурсы понятия интерсубъективности
Аннотация
Литература
Алебастрова А.А. (2015) Проблемы интерсубъективности личности в философии постмодерна. Вестник ТОГУ. Социология и философия, 1: 269–276.
Анисов А.М. (2008) Логика интерсубъективного цитирования. Философский журнал, 1: 109–132.
Артеменко Н.А. (2020) Тематизация сферы пассивности в феноменологии Э. Гуссерля и проблема интерсубъективного мира. Вопросы философии, 8: 193?203.
Борисов Е. (1999) Проблема интерсубъективности в феноменологии Э. Гуссерля. Логос, 1: 65–83 [https://www.ruthenia.ru/logos/number/1999_01/1999_1_05.htm#_ftn1] (дата обращения: 17.03.2021).
Бузский М.П. (2015) Интерсубъективность как свойство культурно-символической формы. Вестник Волгогр. гос. ун-та. Серия 7. Философия, 1: 6–14.
Вахштайн В. (2014) Курьезы и парадоксы феноменологической интервенции. Социология власти, 1: 5–9.
Гуссерль Э. (2004) Кризис европейских наук и трансцендентальная феноменология. СПб.: Владимир Даль.
Гуссерль Э. (2010) Картезианские медитации. М.: Академический проект. Дивисенко К.С. (2005) Концепция жизненного мира в трансцендентальной феноменологии Э. Гуссерля: горизонты социологического исследования. Петербургская социология сегодня, 1: 179–194.
Докучаев И.И. (2016) Генетическая феноменология как метафизика истории, социального и культурного бытия. Культура и цивилизация, 6(5А): 272–283.
Дубровский Д.И. (2014) Интерсубъективность в научном и массовом сознании. Смирнова Н.М. (ред.). Интерсубъективность в науке и философии. М.: Канон+; Реабилитация: 214–217.
Иванова А.С. (2017-а) Влияние феноменологического проекта Э. Гуссерля на социальную теорию. Часть 1. Философия науки и техники, 22(1): 152–161.
Иванова А.С. (2017-б) Влияние феноменологического проекта Э. Гуссерля на социальную теорию. Часть 2. Философия науки и техники, 22(2): 136–147.
Лещев С.В. (2013) Интерсубъективность и коммуникативное действие (неокантианство и постмодернизм прагматики Ю. Хабермаса). Вопросы философии, 3: 165–175 [http://vphil.ru/index.php? Исторические, философские, политические и юридические науки, культурология и искусствоведение. Вопросы теории и практики, 10–2: 115–119.
Мотрошилова Н.В. (2007) Понятие и концепция жизненного мира в поздней философии Эдмунда Гуссерля. Вопросы философии, 7: 102–112.
Назарова В.С. (2018) Трансформация понятия «жизненный мир» субъекта в парадигме интерсубъективизма. Манускрипт, 11–1: 102–106.
Огурцов А.П. (2007). Интерсубъективность как поле философских исследований. Личность. Культура. Общество, 1: 58–69.
Поппер К. (2002) Объективное знание. Эволюционный подход. М.: Эдиториал УРСС, 2002.
Савин А.Э. (2008) Трансцендентализм и историчность в феноменологии Гуссерля. Ханты-Мансийск: РИЦ ЮГУ.
Савин А.Э. (2015) Смыслообразование в свете феноменологической философии. Vox. Философский журнал, 18: 1–21.
Смирнова Н.М. (2014) Концепт интерсубъективности в структурах междисциплинарного синтеза.
Философия науки. Вып. 19. Эпистемология в междисциплинарных исследованиях. М.: ИФ РАН: 145–163.
Смирнова Н.М. (2018) Как возможна междисциплинарная модель интерсубъективности? Касавин И.Т., Воронина Н.Н. (ред.) Эпистемология сегодня.
Идеи, проблемы, дискуссии. Н. Новгород: Изд-во Нижегородского госуниверситета им. Н.И. Лобачевского: 247–261.
Смирнова Н.М., Штыков Д.Р. (2020) Онтологический статус социокультурных объектов как предмет феноменологической критики (А. Шюц, Р. Ингарден). Философский журнал, 13(4): 89–101.
Степанов Ю.С. (2004) Константы: словарь русской культуры. М.: Академический проект.
Тенгели Л. (2012) Интервью с профессором Ласло Тенгели. Часть I. Horizon. Феноменологические исследования, 1(2): 232–247.
Фарман И.П. (2010) Язык и действие: традиционные и новые контексты.
Философия науки. Вып. 15: Эпистемология: актуальные проблемы. М.: ИФ РАН: 163–182.
Хабермас (2008а) Отношения к миру и рациональные аспекты действия в четырех социологических понятиях действия. Социологическое обозрение, 7(1): 3–24.
Хабермас (2008б) Проблематика понимания смысла в социальных науках. Социологическое обозрение, 7(3): 3–33.
Шачин С.В. (2012) Коммуникативная теория разума Юргена Хабермаса и ее применение к некоторым психологическим темам. Культурно-историческая психология, 1: 34–46.
Шмерлина И.А. (2021) «Интерсубъективность»: становление социальнофеноменологического понятия. Социологический журнал, 27(3): 35–59.
Шютц А. (2003а) Основной аргумент «Идей II» Гуссерля. Шютц А. Смысловая структура повседневного мира: очерки по феноменологической социологии М.: Институт Фонда «Общественное мнение»: 10–34.
Шютц А. (2003б) Проблема трансцендентальной интерсубъективности у Гуссерля. Шютц А. Смысловая структура повседневного мира: очерки по феноменологической социологии М.: Институт Фонда «Общественное мнение»: 46–84.
Шюц А. (2004) Обыденная и научная интерпретация человеческого действия. Шюц А. Избранное: Мир, светящийся смыслом. М.: РОССПЭН: 7–50.
Шюц А. (2004). Значение Э. Гуссерля для социальных наук. Шюц А. Избранное: Мир, светящийся смыслом. М.: РОССПЭН: 151–160.
Эннс И.А. (2003) Проблема интерсубъективности: основания и способы тематизации: автореф... канд. филос. наук. Томск.
Якобони М. (2011) Отражаясь в людях: Почему мы понимаем друг друга. М.: Юнайтед Пресс.
Adler E. (1997) Seizing the middle ground: Constructivism in world politics. European Journal of International Relations, 3 (3): 319–363.
Alebastrova A.A. (2015) Problemy intersub"yektivnosti lichnosti v filosofii postmoderna (Problems of personality intersubjectivity in postmodern philosophy). Vestnik TOGU. Sotsiologiya i filosofiya (PNU (Pacific National University) Bulletin. Sociology and Philosophy), 1: 269–276 (in Russian).
Alterman R. (2007) Representation, interaction, and intersubjectivity. Cognitive Science, 31: 815–841.
Anisov A.M. (2008) Logika intersub’yektivnogo tsitirovaniya (The intersubjective citation logic). Filosofskiy zhurnal (Philosophical Journal), 1: 109–132 (in Russian).
Artemenko N.A. (2020) Tematizatsiya sfery passivnosti v fenomenologii E. Gusserlya i problema intersub’yektivnogo mira (Thematization of the sphere of passivity in E. Husserl's phenomenology and the problem of the intersubjective world). Voprosy filosofii (Philosophy Questions), 8: 193?203 (in Russian).
Borisov Ye. (1999) Problema intersub"yektivnosti v fenomenologii E. Gusserlya (The problem of intersubjectivity in E. Husserl’s phenomenology). Logos (Logos), 1: 65–83 [https://www.ruthenia.ru/logos/number/1999_01/1999_1_05.htm#_ftn1] (accessed: 17.03.2021) (in Russian).
Brinck I. (2008) The role of intersubjectivity in the development of intentional communication. Zlatev J. and al. (eds.) The shared mind: perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company: 115–140.
Buzskiy M.P. (2015) Intersubyektivnost' kak svoystvo kul'turno-simvolicheskoy formy (Intersubjectivity as a property of cultural-symbolic form). Vestnik Volgogr. gos. un-ta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya [Bulletin of Volgograd state Univ. Series 7. Philosophy], 1: 6–14 (in Russian).
Coelho Jn.N.E., Figueiredo L.C. (2003) Patterns of Intersubjectivity in the constitution of subjectivity: dimensions of otherness. Culture and Psychology, 9 (3): 193–208.
Divisenko K.S. (2005) Kontseptsiya zhiznennogo mira v transtsendental?noy fenomenologii E. Gusserlya: gorizonty sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya [The concept of the lifeworld in E. Husserl's transcendental phenomenology: Horizons of sociological research]. Peterburgskaya sotsiologiya segodnya [Petersburg Sociology Today], 1: 179–194 (in Russian).
Dokuchayev I.I. (2016) Geneticheskaya fenomenologiya kak metafizika istorii, sotsial'nogo i kul'turnogo bytiya (Genetic phenomenology as a metaphysics of history, social and cultural being). Kul'tura i tsivilizatsiya (Culture and Civilization), 6 (5A): 272–283 (in Russian).
Dubrovskiy D.I. (2014) Intersubyektivnost' v nauchnom i massovom soznanii (Intersubjectivity in scientific and mass consciousness). In: Smirnova N.M. (ed.) Intersub"yektivnost' v nauke i filosofii (Intersubjectivity in Science and Philosophy). Moscow: Kanon+; Reabilitatsiya: 214–217 (in Russian).
Duranti A. (2010) Husserl, intersubjectivity and anthropology. Anthropological Theory, 10(1): 1–20.
Edwards T. (2018) Intersubjectivity [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326994930_Intersubjectivity] (accessed: 15.03.2021).
Enns I.A. (2003) Problema intersub"yektivnosti: osnovaniya i sposoby tematizatsii: Avtoref... kand. filos. nauk (The problem of intersubjectivity: grounds and methods of thematization: Abstract of dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy). Tomsk (in Russian).
Fabian J. (2014) Ethnography and intersubjectivity: loose ends. Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1): 199–209.
Farman I.P. (2010) Yazyk i deystviye: traditsionnyye i novyye konteksty [Language and action: traditional and new contexts]. Filosofiya nauki. Vyp. 15: Epistemologiya: aktual?nyye problemy [Philosophy of Science. Issue. 15: Epistemology: current issues.]. Moscow: IF RAN: 163–182 (in Russian).
Fugelli P. et al. (2013) Shared prolepsis and intersubjectivity in open source development: Expansive grounding in distributed work. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (February 23–27, 2013, San Antonio, TX, USA): 129–143 [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262364640 ] (accessed: 16.03.2021).
Fusaroli R. et al. (2009) The Intersubjectivity of embodiment. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 4(1): 1–5.
Gallagher S. (2009) Two Problems of Intersubjectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16(6–7): 289–308.
Gallese V. (2003) The roots of empathy: the shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology, 36(4): 171–180.
Gillespie A. (2009) The intersubjective nature of symbols. Wagoner B. (ed.) Symbolic transformations. London: Routledge: 23–37.
Gillespie A., Cornish F. (2009) Intersubjectivity: towards a dialogical analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 40(1): 19–46.
Gobodo-Madikizela P. (2016) Interrupting cycles of repetition: creating spaces for dialogue, facing and mourning the past. In: Gobodo-Madikizela P. (ed.). Breaking intergenerational cycles of repetition: A global dialogue on historical trauma and memory. Verlag Barbara Budrich: 113–134.
Gofas A. (2002) Structure, agency and intersubjectivity: Re-capturing the EMU. Policy process in a constructivist realist framework (Paper prepared for the 2nd workshop of the European Political-economy Infrastructure Consortium, May 2002) [http://aei.pitt.edu/725/1/C2W3_Gofas.pdf ] (accessed: 20.03.2021).
Gui L. et al. (2016) Intersubjectivity and sentiment: from language to knowledge. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI–16): 2789–2795 [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306359924_Intersubjectivity_and_Sentiment_from_Language_to_Knowledge#fullTextFileContent] (accessed: 18.03.2021).
Habermas (2008a) Otnosheniya k miru i ratsional?nyye aspekty deystviya v chetyrekh sotsiologicheskikh ponyatiyakh deystviya [Relations to the world and rational aspects of action in four sociological concepts of action]. Sotsiologicheskoye obozreniye [Sociological Review], 7 (1): 3–24 (in Russian).
Habermas (2008b) Problematika ponimaniya smysla v sotsial?nykh naukakh [The problem of understanding meaning in the social sciences]. Sotsiologicheskoye obozreniye [Sociological Review], 7 (3): 3–33 (in Russian).
Husserl E. (2004) Krizis yevropeyskikh nauk i transtsendental'naya fenomenologiya (The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology). St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal' Publ. (in Russian).
Husserl E. (2010) Kartezianskiye meditatsii (Cartesian Meditations). Moscow: Akademicheskiy proyekt (in Russian).
Intersubjectivity (2002). Calhoun C. (ed.) Dictionary of the Social Sciences. Oxford University Press [https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195123715.001.0001/acref-9780195123715-e-860] (accessed: 17.03.2021).
Intersubjectivity-a. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Encyclopedia.com [https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/intersubjectivity] (accessed: 16.03.2021).
Intersubjectivity-b. Alleydog.com's online glossary [https://www.alleydog.com/glossary/definition.php?term=Intersubjectivity ] (accessed: 16.03.2021).
Ivanova A.S. (2017-b) Vliyaniye fenomenologicheskogo proyekta E. Gusserlya na sotsial?nuyu teoriyu. Chast? 2 [The influence of E. Husserl's phenomenological project on social theory. Part 2]. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki [Philosophy of science and technology], 22 (2): 136–147 (in Russian).
Ivanova A.S. (2017-а) Vliyaniye fenomenologicheskogo proyekta E. Gusserlya na sotsial'nuyu teoriyu. Chast' 1 (The influence of E. Husserl's phenomenological project on social theory. Part 1). Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki (Philosophy of Science and Technology), 22(1): 152–161 (in Russian).
Krueger J., Legrand D. (2009) The open body. In: Carassa A. et al. (eds.) Enacting intersubjectivity: Paving the way for a dialogue between cognitive science, social cognition and neuroscience (Proceedings of international workshop; Lugano, Switzerland, february 13th and 14th 2009): 109–128.
Kvale S. (1994) Ten standard objections to qualitative research interviews. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 25(2): 147–183.
Leadbeater B.J. (1989) Between subjects: shared meanings of intersubjectivity. Paper presented at the National Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development (21st, Kansas City, MO, April 27–30, 1989).
Leshchev S.V. (2013) Intersub?yektivnost? i kommunikativnoye deystviye (neokantianstvo i postmodernizm pragmatiki YU. Khabermasa) [Intersubjectivity and communicative action (Neo-Kantianism and postmodernism of J. Habermas's pragmatism)]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy], 3: 165–175 [http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=720] (accessed: 24.01.2018) (in Russian).
Ligorio M. B. et al. (2005). Building intersubjectivity at a distance during the collaborative writing of fairytales. Computers & Education, 45: 357–374.
Lodder P. et al. (2015) Enactivism and neonatal imitation: conceptual and empirical considerations and clarifications. Di Paolo E., De Jaegher H. (eds.) Towards an embodied science of intersubjectivity: Widening the scope of social understanding research. Lausanne: Frontiers Media: 29–39.
Luckmann T. (2007) Aspekty teorii kommunikatsii [Aspects of communication theory]. Sotsiologicheskoye obozreniye [Sociological Review], 6 (3): 3–20 (in Russian).
Luhmann N. (2007) Vvedeniye v sistemnuyu teoriyu [Introduction to systems theory]. Moscow: Logos Publ. (in Russian).
McKenzie J. (2015) Recognizing decentered intersubjectivity in social experience. Emotion Review, 7(1): 73–78.
Minnullina E.B. (2013) Intersub?yektivnost? kak bytiye-v-rechi v prostranstve zhiznennogo mira [Intersubjectivity as being-in-speech in the space of the life world]. Istoricheskiye, filosofskiye, politicheskiye i yuridicheskiye nauki, kul?turologiya i iskusstvovedeniye. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of Theory and Practice], 10–2: 115–119 (in Russian).
Motroshilova N.V. (2007) Ponyatiye i kontseptsiya zhiznennogo mira v pozdney filosofii Edmunda Gusserlya [The concept and concept of the lifeworld in the late philosophy of Edmund Husserl]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy], 7: 102–112 (in Russian).
Nazarova V.S. (2018) Transformatsiya ponyatiya «zhiznennyy mir» rassmatrivayet·sya v paradigme intersubyektivizma [The transformation of the concept of “lifeworld” is considered in the paradigm of intersubjectivism]. Manuskript [Manuscript], 11–1: 102–106 (in Russian).
Ogurtsov A.P. (2007). Intersubyektivnost' kak pole filosofskikh issledovaniy. (Intersubjectivity as a field of philosophical research). Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo (Personality. Culture. Society), 1: 58–69 (in Russian).
Overgaard S., Zahavi D. (2009) Phenomenological sociology: The Subjectivity of everyday life. Jacobsen M.H. et al. (eds.) Encountering the everyday: An introduction to the sociologies of the unnoticed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 93–115.
Popper K. (2002) Obyektivnoye znaniye. Evolyutsionnyy podkhod [Objective knowledge. evolutionary approach]. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2002 (in Russian).
Reich W. (2010) Three problems of intersubjectivity — and one solution. Sociological Theory, 28(1): 40–63.
Savin A.E. (2008) Transtsendentalizm i istorichnost? v fenomenologii Gusserlya [Transcendentalism and Historicity in Husserl's Phenomenology]. Khanty-Mansiysk: RITS YUGU (in Russian).
Savin A.E. (2015) Smysloobrazovaniye v svete fenomenologicheskoy filosofii [Meaning formation in the light of phenomenological philosophy]. Vox. Filosofskiy zhurnal [Vox. Philosophical Journal], 18: 1–21 (in Russian).
Scheff T. (2001) Goffman on surface and interior [http://scheff.faculty.soc.ucsb.edu/main.php?id=19.html online ] (accessed: 18.03.2021).
Schutz A. (2003a) Osnovnoy argument «Idey II» Gusserlya (The main argument of “Ideas II” by Husserl). In: Schutz A. Smyslovaya struktura povsednevnogo mira: ocherki po fenomenologicheskoy sotsiologii (The semantic structure of the everyday world: essays on phenomenological sociology). Moscow: Institut Fonda «Obshchestvennoye mneniye»: 10–34 (in Russian).
Schutz A. (2003b) Problema transtsendental'noy intersub"yektivnosti u Gusserlya (The problem of transcendental intersubjectivity in Husserl). In: Schutz A. Smyslovaya struktura povsednevnogo mira: ocherki po fenomenologicheskoy sotsiologii (The semantic structure of the everyday world: essays on phenomenological sociology). Moscow: Institut Fonda «Obshchestvennoye mneniye»: 46–84 (in Russian).
Schutz A. (2004). Obydennaya i nauchnaya interpretatsiya chelovecheskogo deystviya [Ordinary and scientific interpretation of human action]. In: A. Schutz. Izbrannoye: Mir, svetyashchiysya smyslom (Selected: A world glowing with meaning). Moscow: ROSSPEN: 7–50 (in Russian).
Schutz A. (2004). Znacheniye E. Gusserlya dlya sotsial'nykh nauk [The importance of E. Husserl for the social sciences]. In: A. Schutz. Izbrannoye: Mir, svetyashchiysya smyslom [Selected: A world glowing with meaning]. Moscow: ROSSPEN: 151–160 (in Russian).
Scriven M. (1972) Objectivity and subjectivity in educational research. L. G. Thomas L.G. (ed.) Philosophical redirection of educational research. Chicago: Chicago University Press: 95–142.
Shachin S.V. (2012) Kommunikativnaya teoriya razuma Yurgena Khabermasa i yeye primeneniye k nekotorym psikhologicheskim temam [The communicative theory of mind by Jurgen Habermas and its application to some psychological topics]. Kul?turno- istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 1: 34–46 (in Russian).
Shmerlina I.A. (2021) «Intersub’yektivnost'»: stanovleniye sotsial'no-fenomenologicheskogo ponyatiya (“Intersubjectivity”: the formation of a social-phenomenological concept). Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal (Sociological Journal), 27(3): 35–59 (in Russian).
Sinha C. (2009) Objects in a storied world: materiality, normativity, narrativity. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16(6–8): 167–190.
Smirnova N.M. (2014) Kontsept intersub"yektivnosti v strukturakh mezhdistsiplinarnogo sinteza (The concept of intersubjectivity in the structures of interdisciplinary synthesis). Filosofiya nauki. Vyp. 19. Epistemologiya v mezhdistsiplinarnykh issledovaniyakh [Philosophy of Science. Issue 19. Epistemology in interdisciplinary research]. Moscow: IF RAN: 145–163 (in Russian).
Smirnova N.M. (2018) Kak vozmozhna mezhdistsiplinarnaya model' intersub"yektivnosti? (How is an interdisciplinary model of intersubjectivity possible?) In: Kasavin I.T., Voronina N.N. (eds.). Epistemologiya segodnya. Idei, problemy, diskussii [Epistemology today. Ideas, problems, discussions]. N. Novgorod: Nizhegorodskii gosuniversitet im. N.I. Lobachevskogo Publ.: 247–261 (in Russian).
Smirnova N.M., Shtykov D.R. (2020) Ontologicheskiy status sotsiokul'turnykh ob"yektov kak predmet fenomenologicheskoy kritiki (A. Shyuts, R. Ingarden) (Ontological status of sociocultural objects as a subject of phenomenological criticism (A. Sch?tz, R. Ingarden)). Filosofskiy zhurnal (Philosophical Journal), 13 (4): 89–101 (in Russian).
Stahl G. (2016) From intersubjectivity to group cognition. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 25(4–5): 355–384.
Stepanov Yu.S. (2004) Konstanty: Slovar? russkoy kul?tury [Constants: Dictionary of Russian Culture]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proyekt (in Russian).
Stevanovic M., Koski S.E. (2018) Intersubjectivity and the domains of social interaction: proposal of a cross-sectional approach. Psychology of Language and Communication, 22(1): 39–70.
Tengeli L. (2012) Interv'yu s professorom Laslo Tengeli. Chast' I (Interview with Professor Laszlo Tengeli. Part I). Horizon. Fenomenologicheskiye issledovaniya (Horizon. Phenomenological Research), 1 (2): 232–247 (in Russian).
Trevarthen C. (1979) Communication and cooperation in early infancy: a description of primary intersubjectivity. Bullowa M. (ed.) Before speech: the beginning of interpersonal communication. Cambridge; London; New York; Melbourne: Cambridge University Press: 321–340.
Vakhshtayn V. (2014) Kur?yezy i paradoksy fenomenologicheskoy interventsii [Curiosities and paradoxes of phenomenological intervention]. Sotsiologiya vlasti [Sociology of Power], 1: 5–9 (in Russian).
Violi P. (2009) How our bodies become us: Embodiment, semiosis and intersubjectivity. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 4(1): 57–75.
Yakoboni M. (2011) Otrazhayas' v lyudyakh: Pochemu my ponimayem drug druga (Mirroring people: the new science of how we connect with others). Moscow: Yunayted Press (in Russian).
Zahavi D. (2001) Beyond empathy. Phenomenological approaches to intersubjectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5–7): 151–167.
Zahavi D. (2005) Subjectivity and selfhood: Investigating the first person perspective. Cambridge: MIT.
Zlatev J. et al. (2008) Intersubjectivity: what makes us human? In: Zlatev J. et al. (eds.) The shared mind: perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company: 1–14.
Поступила: 09.03.2023