Progress and Modernity: The Problem with Autonomy

doi:10.31119/jssa.2022.25.2.1

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2022.25.2.1

Peter Wagner ICREA and University of Barcelona, Spain peter.wagner@ub.edu

How to Cite

Wagner P. (2022) Progress and Modernity: The Problem with Autonomy. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii (The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology), 25(2): 7-27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2022.25.2.1

Abstract

The idea of modernity is inextricably tied up with the one of progress. One main reason for this connection is that the late eighteenth century, often considered to be the onset of modernity, was in Europe also seen as the dawn of a new society evolving according to a different logic than any preceding one, namely with an open horizon of future possibilities. This article explores the meaning of this opening by first looking at the elaboration of what is called here a “strong concept of progress”, based on the connection between autonomy and reason, and by subsequently confronting this concept with the historical experiences with progress. This confrontation helps to understand the transformations in the expectations of progress from the middle of the nineteenth to the middle of the twentieth century. As a result a more nuanced view of the relation between progress and modernity will be proposed that can be fruitful for assessing our current expectations of progress in the context of contemporary modernity.

Keywords:

autonomy, democracy, domination, modernity, progress

References

Baker K.M. (1990) Inventing the French Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Burke E. (1993) [1790] Reflections on the Revolution in France. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chakrabarty D. (2000) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Habermas J. (1962) Strukturwandel der ?ffentlichkeit. Neuwied: Luchterhand.

Halperin S. (2004) War and Social Change in Modern Europe. The Great Transformation Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hirschman A. (1991) The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Karagiannis N., Wagner P. (2008) Varieties of agonism: conflict, the common good and the need for synagonism. Journal of Social Philosophy, 39(3): 323–339.

Koselleck R. (2004) [1979] Futures Past. On the Semantics of Historical Time. New York: Columbia University Press.

Koselleck R., Reichardt R. (eds.) (1988) Die Franz?sische Revolution als Bruch des gesellschaftlichen Bewusstseins. Munich: Oldenbourg.

Latour B. (1991) Nous n'avons jamais ?t? modernes. Paris: La D?couverte.

Stein L. von (1850) Die Geschichte der sozialen Bewegung in Frankreich von 1789 bis auf unsere Tage. Leipzig.

Tocqueville A. de (1835) De la D?mocratie en Am?rique. http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/30513

Wagner P. (2015a) Progress: a reconstruction. Cambridge: Polity.

Wagner P. (2015b) Interpreting the present: a research programme. Social Imaginaries, 1(1): 105–129.