Репетиторство в России: нельзя увидеть, но можно услышать

doi:10.31119/jssa.2020.23.3.5

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2020.23.3.5

Петр Макеев Национальный исследовательский университет “Высшая школа экономики”, Москва, Россия makeev7773@gmail.com

Для цитирования

Макеев П. Репетиторство в России: нельзя увидеть, но можно услышать. Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии, 23(3): 100-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2020.23.3.5

Аннотация

Current paper is devoted to the phenomenon of private tutoring in Russia. Private tutoring is widely spread in Russian Federation and market of private tutoring is still emerging and growing. Legally private tutors in Russian Federation are seen as self-employed who perform their activity in the informal sector of the economy and are “invisible” to official statistics. Most of them do not pay taxes and have no formal status though in fact the same majority of them work in schools or universities. Number of legislative initiatives, which were established to bring self-employed out of shadows, has not succeeded completely and the majority of private tutors still operate without formalization and see all legislative initiatives as another enforcement to pay «more taxes». This specific provokes the necessity to use qualitative sociological methods for revealing insights and analyzing market of private tutoring. Within current paper authors qualitative research, reinforced with preliminary quantitative study, is presented. Brief literature review is presented in the beginning, providing the definition of private tutoring as “shadow education”. Results of the research done with the help of semi-structured interviews are shown. Interviews were held with private tutors of different age and their clients. As one of the results — two groups of private tutors are revealed: “experienced” and “novice”. Interviews, as method, provide opportunity to describe private tutors' motivation, the way they search for new clients and pricing mechanism. Atypical cases and diversity of private tutoring as informal economic activity are presented.

Литература

Bray M. (2011) The challenge of shadow education: private tutoring and its implications for policy makers in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission.

Byun S., Baker D. (2015) Shadow education. In: Scott R.A., Kosslyn S.M. (eds.) Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons: 1–9.

Balakina T. (2011) Ekonomika repetitorstva: motivy, stimuly, modeli [Economy of private tutoring: motives and models]. Finansy i biznes [Finance and Business], 2: 4–15 (in Russian).

Barsukova S. (2003) Formal'noe i neformal'noe trudoustrojstvo: paradoksal'noe skhodstvo na fone ochevidnogo razlichiya [Formal and informal labour: paradox and similarity at the same time]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 7: 3–16 (In Russian).

Barsukova S. (2003) Esse o neformal'noj ekonomike, ili 16 ottenkov serogo [Essay on informal economy: 16 shades of grey]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki (in Russian).

Biswal P. (1999) Private tutoring and public corruption: a cost-effective education system for developing countries. The Developing Economies, 37(2): 222–240.

Bray M. (2013) Shadow education: comparative perspectives on the expansion and implications of private supplementary tutoring. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 77: 412–420.

Bray M., Kwok P. (2003) Demand for private supplementary tutoring: conceptual considerations, and socio-economic patterns in Hong Kong. Economics of Education Review, 22(6): 611–620.

Cohen P., Kulik J., Kulik C. (1982) Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2): 237–248.

Damm I.A. (2018) Korrupcionnoe repetitorstvo i ego preduprezhdenie [Corruption tutoring and its prevention]. Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya [Administrative Law and Administration Practice], 1: 24–32.

Das G., Das R. (2013) An empirical view on private tutoring in school mathematics of Kamrup District. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(5): 1–8.

Foondun R. (2002) The issue of private tuition: an analysis of the practice in Mauritius and selected South-East Asian Countries. International Review of Education, 48(6): 485–515.

Glewwe P., Hanushek A., Humpage S., Ravina R. (2011) School resources and educational outcomes in developing countries: A Review of the literature from 1990 to 2010. NBER Working Paper No. 17554: 13–64.

Huang M. (2013) After-school tutoring and the distribution of student performance. Comparative Education Review, 57(4): 689–710.

Ireson J. (2004) Private tutoring: how prevalent and effective is it? London Review of Education, 2(2): 109–22.

James E. (1987) The public/private division of responsibility for education: An international comparison. Economics of Education Review, 6(1): 1–14.

Kim S., Lee J. (2010) Private Tutoring and Demand for Education in South Korea. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 58(2): 259–296.

Kozar O. (2013) The face of private tutoring in Russia: evidence from online marketing by private tutors. Research in Comparative and International Education, 8(1): 74–86.

Kuan P. (2011) Effects of Cram Schooling on Mathematics Performance: Evidence from High Students in Taiwan. Comparative Education Review, 55(3): 342–368.

Loyalka P., Zakharov A. (2016) Does shadow education help students prepare for college? Evidence from Russia. International Journal of Educational Development, 49(7): 22–30.

Makeev P. (2018) Samozanyatost' v Rossii: teoreticheskoye opredelniye, prakticheskoye izmereniye i zakonodatel'noye regulirovaniye [Self-Employment in Russia: Theoretical Definition, Measurement and Legislative Regulation]. EKO, 11: 148–157 (in Russian).

Мakeev P.A. (2019) Repetitorstvo v Rossii: opisaniye yalveniya na osnove onlayn-platform [Private tutoring in Russia: description of the phenomenon based on online platforms]. Zhurnal institutsional'nykh issledovaniy [Journal of institutional studies], 11: 106–120 (in Russian).

Matyushkina M. (2019) Effektivnost' shkoly i eyo kriterii v sovremennyh usloviyah rasprostraneniya repetitorstva i dostupnosti interneta [School efficiency and its criteria in the era of internet]. Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: 21 vek [Constant education: 21 century], 1(25): 53–64 (in Russian)

Mischo C., Haag L. (2002) Expansion and effectiveness of private tutoring. European journal of psychology of education, 17(3): 263–273

Naumova A. (2017) Rol' repetitorstva v sovremennoj sisteme obrazovaniya [Role of private tutoring in the modern educational system]. Rossiya mezhdu modernizaciej i arhaizaciej: 1917–2017: materialy XX Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii: v 2-kh tomakh [Russia between modernization and archaization: 1917–2017: materials of the XX All-Russian scientific and practical conference: in 2 volumes]. Surgut: «Gumanitarnyy universitet» (in Russian).

Rosenshine B., Furst N. (1969) The Effects of Tutoring upon Pupil Achievement: Research Review. Eric, 1–43.

Shchelkova S.D. (2015) Rol' sovremennyh roditelej v razvitii repetitorstva v mladshej shkole [Parents’ role in development of the private tutoring in elementary school]. Na putyah k novoj shkole [To the new school], 1: 48–50 (in Russian).

Shipkova E.N. (2018) Repetitorstvo kak vybor sovremennyh roditelej [Private tutoring as a parents’ choice]. Aktual'nye voprosy nauki [Contemporary issues of science], 40: 195–198 (in Russian).

Smyth E., (2009) Buying your way into college? Private tuition and the transition to higher education in Ireland. Oxford review of education, 35(1): 1–22.

??astn? V. (2017) Private tutoring lessons supply: insights from online advertising in the Czech Republic. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(4): 561–579.

Tansel A., Bircan F. (2006) Demand for education in Turkey: A tobit analysis of private tutoring expenditures. Economics of Education Review, Special Issue: In Honor of W. Pierce Liles, 25 (3): 303–313.

Tsiplakides I. (2018) Shadow education and social class inequalities in secondary education in Greece: The case of teaching English as a foreign language. International Journal of Sociology of Education, 7 (1): 1–71.

Wasik B., Slavin R. (1993) Preventing early reading failure with one-to-one tutoring: a review of five programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(2): 178–200.

Watson L. (2008) Private expectations and public schooling: the growth of private tutoring in Australia. (AARE) National Conference, 11: 1–15.

Yu Zh. (2013). Does private tutoring improve students National College Entrance exam performance? — A case study from Jinan, China. Economics of Education Review, 32: 1–28.

Zhulyabina N.M. (2017) Fenomen elektronnogo repetitorstva: novyj shag k sokrashcheniyu neravenstva v obrazovanii? [Phenomenon of online private tutoring: new step in education?]. Pisma v Emissiya.Offlayn [The Emissia.Offline Letters], 6: 25 (in Russian).