Академик А.С. Лаппо-Данилевский и российская социология. Размышления над книгой А.В. Малинова «Социологическое наследие А.С. Лаппо-Данилевского: исследования и материалы»

  • Виктор Куприянов Saint Petersburg Branch of S.I. Vavilov Institute for the History of Science and Technology of the RAS, Saint Petersburg, Russia nonignarus-artis@mai.ru
Для цитирования
Куприянов В. Академик А.С. Лаппо-Данилевский и российская социология. Размышления над книгой А.В. Малинова «Социологическое наследие А.С. Лаппо-Данилевского: исследования и материалы». Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии, 22(5): 223-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2019.22.5.14

Аннотация

The article presents an analytical review of the book “The Sociological Legacy of A.S. Lappo-Danilevsky: Research and Materials” by A.V. Malinov. The author evaluates this monograph both in the context of the history of sociology and in the perspective of contemporary problems of sociological science, which is important for understanding of the relevance of the scientific legacy of A. S. Lappo-Danilevsky. The purpose of the article concerns, on the one hand, drawing the attention of Russian sociologists to a new study on the history of Russian sociology, and on the other, actualizing of the important component of the still significant legacy of Russian philosophical and social thinking. The article points out that although A.S. Lappo-Danilevsky left only one published work related to sociological topics, his contribution to the history of Russian sociology should be recognized as extremely significant. The author shows that A.S. Lappo-Danilevsky’s scientific-organizational and pedagogical activity contributed to the formation of sociology in Russia as an independent science and fostered the creating of the basis for its further professionalization. In the context of discussion of the monograph by A.V. Malinov, the research notes the affinity between Lappo-Danilevsky’s historical and scientific project and the concept of the Russian history proposed by G.G. Shpet. An important task of the article is to problematize the viewpoint concerning Lappo-Danilevsky's Neo-Kantianism. The author notes that although the Russian historian often uses neo-Kantian methodology in his methodological research, his sociological doctrine remains within the framework of positivism. Lappo-Danilevsky’s sociological project is a positivist in its essence, which is expressed in the desire to identify social laws that can be mathematized. The author shows the relevance of this approach for modern sociology. The paper also underlines the significance of the study by A.V. Malinov for clarification of the character of Russian philosophy of the late XIX–XX centuries. The author of the paper notes that the study by A.V. Malinov shows that Russian philosophy of this period cannot be reduced to religious problematics. At the beginning of the XX century, Russian university philosophy was focused on scientific philosophizing with its tendency to understand philosophy as a strict science.

Литература

Berus V.V. (1998) Problemy filosofii istorii v russkom neokantianstve: A.S. Lappo-Danilevsky: avtoreferat dis. ... kandidata filosofskikh nauk [Problems of the philosophy of history in Russian neo-Kantianism: A.S. Lappo-Danilevsky: abstract of thesis dis. ... candidate of philosophical sciences]. St. Petersburg (in Russian).

Dunaeva E.V. (2019) 2019.02.022. Malinov A.V. Sociologicheskoe nasledie A.S. Lappo-Danilevskogo: issledovaniya i materialy. St. Petersburg.: RXGA, 2017. — 336 s. [2019.02.0.022. Malinov A.V. Sociological heritage of A.S. Lappo-Danilevsky: research and materials. SPb.: RHGA, 2017. — 336 p.] Socialnye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Seriya 5: istoriya. Referativnyy zhurnal [Social and human sciences. Domestic and foreign literature. Series 5: History. Abstract Journal], 2: 151–153 (in Russian).

Kupriyanov V.A. (2019) Revolyuciya i intelligenciya v «Ocherke razvitiya russkoj filosofii» G.G. Shpeta [Revolution and intelligentsia in the Essay on the Development of Russian Philosophy G.G. Shpet]. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophical Sciences], 62(1): 139–151 (in Russian).

Malinov A.V. (2017a) Sociologicheskoe nasledie A.S. Lappo-Danilevskogo: issledovaniya i materialy [Sociological heritage of A.S. Lappo-Danilevsky: research and materials]. St. Petersburg: RXGA (in Russian).

Malinov A.V. (2017b) Sudba proekta «Russkaya nauka». 1916–1920 (k 100-letiyu komissii po izdaniyu sbornika «Russkaya nauka»): stati i dokumenty (2016) red. V.M. Orel, G.I. Smagina, Y.M. Baturin. St. Petersburg; Moscow 2016. 848 S. ISBN 978–5–94668–189–6 [The fate of the project “Russian Science”. 1916–1920 (to the 100th anniversary of the commission for the publication of the collection "Russian Science"): articles and documents. (2016) eds. V.M. Eagle, G.I. Smagin, Y.M. Baturin. SPb.; M. 2016. 848 S. ISBN 978–5–94668–189–6]. Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniya i tekhniki [Questions of the History of Natural Science and Technology], 38(2): 392–396 (in Russian).

Malinov A.V., Pogodin S.N. (2001) Aleksandr Sergeevich Lappo-Danilevskij: istorik i filosof [Alexander Sergeevich Lappo-Danilevsky: historian and philosopher]. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPb (in Russian).

Osipov I.D. (2003) Politicheskaya kul`turologiya A.S. Lappo-Danilevskogo [Political culturology A.S. Lappo-Danilevsky]. In: Malinov A.V. (ed.) Istoricheskaya nauka i metodologiya istorii v Rossii XX veka [Historical science and the methodology of history in Russia of the XX century]. St. Petersburg: Severnaya zvezda: 247–257 (in Russian).

Rickert H. (1997) Granicy estestvennonauchnogo obrazovaniya ponyatij [The boundaries of science education concepts]. St. Petersburg: Nauka (in Russian).

Rostovtsev E.A. (2003) Nasledie A.S. Lappo Danilevskogo v otechestvennoj istoricheskoj nauke [Legacy of A.S. Lappo Danilevsky in Russian historical science. Historical science and the methodology of history in Russia of the XX century]. In: Istoricheskaya nauka i metodologiya istorii v Rossii XX veka [Historical science and the methodology of history in Russia of the XX century]. St. Petersburg: Severnaya zvezda: 99–142 (in Russian).

Shatskiy E. (2018) Istoriya sociologicheskoj mysli. Tom 1 [The history of sociological thought. Volume 1]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie (in Russian).

Sudba proekta «Russkaya nauka». 1916–1920 (k 100-letiyu komissii po izdaniyu sbornika «Russkaya nauka»): stati i dokumenty` [The fate of the project “Russian Science”. 1916–1920 (to the 100th anniversary of the commission for the publication of the collection “Russian Science”): articles and documents.] (2016) eds. V.M. Orel, G.I. Smagina, Y.M. Baturin. St. Petersburg; Moscow (in Russian).

Whitley R. (1980) Kognitivnaya i socialnaya institucionalizaciya nauchnykh specialnostej i oblastej issledovaniya [Cognitive and social institutionalization of scientific specialties and areas of research]. In: Mirskiy E.M., Yudin B.G. (eds.) Nauchnaya deyatelnost: struktura i instituty [Scientific activity: structure and institutions]. Moscow: Progress: 218–256 (in Russian).

Форматы цитирования
Другие форматы цитирования:

ACM
[1]
Куприянов, В. . Академик А.С. Лаппо-Данилевский и российская социология. Размышления над книгой А.В. Малинова «Социологическое наследие А.С. Лаппо-Данилевского: исследования и материалы». Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. 22, 5 (), 223-236. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2019.22.5.14.