Проблема прав собственности в работах Эрнандо де Сото: критический обзор

Николай Карбаинов Социологический институт РАН, Санкт-Петербург, Россия nkarbainov@gmail.com

Для цитирования

Карбаинов Н. Проблема прав собственности в работах Эрнандо де Сото: критический обзор. Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии, 20(1): 181–190.

Аннотация

В статье рассмотрены основные критические аргументы в отношении идей Эрнандо де Сото, в первую очередь, связанных с проблемой прав собственности, в русскоязычной и англоязычной литературе. По результатам анализа литературы выделены следующие критические аргументы, направленные против концепции Эрнандо де Сото: 1) использование модели homo economicus и невнимание к социальным, культурным и политическим факторам; 2) эволюционистский уклон и европоцентризм; 3) легализация собственности — не панацея для решения проблем бедности; 4) формализация ведет к перераспределению собственности и приводит к экономическим и социальным издержкам для бедных слоев населения; 5) бедняки имеют ограниченный доступ к банковскому кредиту после формализации.

Ключевые слова:

права собственности, Эрнандо де Сото, неформальная собственность, легализация прав собственности

Биография автора

Николай Карбаинов, Социологический институт РАН, Санкт-Петербург, Россия

Магистр социологии Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге, научный сотрудник, Центр культурных исследований постсоциализма Казанского федерального университета

Литература

Бочаров В.В. (2013) Неписаный закон: антропология права. 2 изд. СПб.: издательство АИК.

Бочаров В.В. (2015) Земельная собственность в представлениях современных российских крестьян. Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии, 18(1): 146–162.

Галиндабаева В.В. (2014) Мегасобытия в постсоветских городах: неопатримониальные машины роста и присвоение государственной собственности. Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии, 17(5): 126–140.

де Сото Э. (1995) Иной путь. Невидимая революция в третьем мире. Пер. с англ. Б. Пинскер. М.: Catallaxy.

де Сото Э. (2004) Загадка капитала. Почему капитализм торжествует на Западе и терпит поражение во всем остальном мире. Пер. с англ. Б. Пинскер. М: ЗАО «Олимп-Бизнес».

Журавская Т.Н. (2014) «Собственники без собственности»: неформальные практики в условиях открытого рынка. Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии, 17(5): 52–69.

Карбаинов Н.И. (2010) Стратегии обоснования прав собственности на землю в ситуации правового плюрализма (на примере земельных споров в г. Улан-Удэ). Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии, 13(4): 140–157.

Карбаинов Н.И. (2014) Как владельцы (не) становятся частными собственниками (на примере земельных конфликтов в Улан-Удэ и Сочи). Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии, 17(5): 85–108.

Касаткина А.К. (2015) Частная собственность и коллективное товарищество: режимы собственности и социальные отношения в садоводческих некоммерческих товариществах ленинградской области 2000-х гг. Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии, 18(1): 163–178.

Кирдина С. (2004) Может ли ученый изменить мир? (Эрнандо де Сото: Загадка капитала). Отечественные записки, 6(21): 246–252.

Латов Ю.В., Нестик Т.А. (2002) «Плохие» законы или культурные традиции? Общественные науки и современность, 5: 35–47.

Норт Д. (1997) Институты, институциональные изменения и функционирование экономики. Пер. с англ. М.: Фонд экономической книги Начала.

Рыжова Н.П. (2014) Земля и власть: различия в подходах к исследованию собственности (случай неформального землепользования китайских фермеров). Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии, 17(5): 7–35.

Тыканова Е.В., Хохлова А.М. (2014) Конфликт прав собственности в постсоветском городе (на примере случаев сноса гаражей в Санкт-Петербурге). Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии, 17(5): 109–125.

Alchian A., Demsetz H. (1973) The Property Right Paradigm. The Journal of Economic History, 33(1): 16–27.

Alexander G.S. (2010) Culture and Capitalism: A Comment on de Soto. In: Hernando de Soto and Property in a Market Economy. Ed. B. Baross. Farnham & Burlington: Ashgate: 41–50.

Benda-Beckmann von F. (2003) Mysteries of capital or mystification of legal property? Focaal — European Journal of Anthropology, 41: 187–191.

Benda-Beckmann F. von, Benda-Beckmann K. von, Wiber M. (2009) The Properties of Property. In: Changing Properties of Property. Benda-Beckmann F. von, Benda-Beckmann K. von, Wiber M. (eds.). Oxford: Berghahn: 1–39.

Berner E. (2000) Poverty Alleviation and the Eviction of the Poorest: Towards Urban Land Reform in the Philippines. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(3): 554–566.

Brophy A.L. (2010) Hernando de Soto and the Histories of Property Law. In: Hernando de Soto and Property in a Market Economy. Ed. B. Baross. Farnham & Burlington: Ashgate: 51–60.

Davis M. (2006) Planet of Slums. London & New York: Verso.

De Soto H. (1989) The Other Path: The invisible revolution in the third world. New York: Basic Books.

De Soto H. (2000) The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. New York: Basic Books.

Demsetz H. (1967) Toward a Theory of Property Rights. The American Economic Review, 57(2): 347–359.

Epstein R.A. (1985) Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Harvard University Press.

Fernandes E. (2002) The Influence of de Soto's The Mystery of Capital. Land Lines, 14(1): 1–8.

Galiani S., Schargrodsky E. (2010) Property rights for the poor: Effects of land titling. Journal of Public Economics, 94(9): 700–729.

Gilbert A. (2002) On the mystery of capital and the myths of Hernando de Soto: what difference does legal title make? International Development Planning Review, 24(1): 1–19.

Hann C.M. (1998) Introduction: the Embeddedness of Property. In: Property Relations: Renewing the Anthropological Tradition, C.M. Hann (ed.). Cambridge: CUP: 1–47.

Hendrix S.E. (1995) Myths of Property Rights. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 12(1): 183–223.

Humphrey C., Verdery K. (2004) Introduction: Raising Questions about Property. In: Property in Question: Value Transformation in the Global Economy. Humphrey C., Verdery K. (eds.). Oxford: Berg: 1–28.

Kerekes C.B., Williamson C.R. (2008) Unveiling de Soto’s Mystery: Property rights, capital, and development. Journal of Institutional Economics, 4(3): 371–87.

Kingwill R., Cousins B., Cousins T., Hornby D., Royston L., Smit W. (2007) Mysteries and Myths: De Soto, Property and Poverty in South Africa. In: Are Hernando de Soto’s views appropriate to South Africa? Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand: 53–65.

Marcuse P. (1996) Privatization and its Discontents: Property Rights in Land and Housing in the Transition in Eastern Europe. In: Cities after socialism: urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies, G. Andrusz, M. Harloe and I. Szelenyi (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers: 119–191.

Nyamu-Musembi C. (2007) De Soto and Land Relations in Rural Africa: breathing life into dead theories about property rights. Third World Quarterly, 28(8): 1457–1478.

Royston L. (2007) Snakes and ladders: A housing perspective on de Soto and the first and second economy debate in South Africa. In: Are Hernando de Soto’s views appropriate to South Africa? Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand: 32–43.

Scott J.C. (1977) The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. Yale University Press.

Singer J.W. (2000) Entitlement: The Paradoxes of Property. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

Thompson E.P. (1971) The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the 18th Century. Past & Present, 50: 76–136.

Tomlinson M.R. (2007) Are title deeds a silver bullet for accessing credit? In: Are Hernando de Soto’s views appropriate to South Africa? Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand: 17–31.

Underkuffler-Freund L. (1996) Property: Special Right. Notre Dame Law Review, 71(5): 1033–1058.

Woodruff C. (2001) Review of de Soto's “The Mystery of Capital”. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(4): 1215–1223.

Alchian A., Demsetz H. (1973) The Property Right Paradigm. The Journal of Economic History, 33(1): 16–27.

Alexander G.S. (2010) Culture and Capitalism: A Comment on de Soto. In: Hernando de Soto and Property in a Market Economy. Ed. B. Baross. Farnham & Burlington: Ashgate: 41–50.

Benda-Beckmann F. von, Benda-Beckmann K. von, Wiber M. (2009) The Properties of Property. In: Changing Properties of Property. Benda-Beckmann F. von, Benda-Beckmann K. von, Wiber M. (eds.). Oxford: Berghahn: 1–39.

Benda-Beckmann von F. (2003) Mysteries of capital or mystification of legal property? Focaal – European Journal of Anthropology, 41: 187–191.

Berner E. (2000) Poverty Alleviation and the Eviction of the Poorest: Towards Urban Land Reform in the Philippines. International Journal of Urban and Regional Researchh, 24(3): 554–566.

Bocharov V.V. (2013) Nepisanyy zakon: antropologiya prava [Unwritten law: anthropology of law]. SPb.: izdatel'stvo AIK (in Russian).

Bocharov V.V. (2015) Zemel'naya sobstvennost' v predstavleniyakh sovremennykh rossiyskikh krest'yan [Land ownership in the views of modern Russian peasants]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 18(1): 146–162 (in Russian).

Brophy A.L. (2010) Hernando de Soto and the Histories of Property Law. In: Hernando de Soto and Property in a Market Economy. Ed. B. Baross. Farnham & Burlington: Ashgate: 51–60.

Davis M. (2006) Planet of Slums. London & New York: Verso.

de Soto E. (1995) Inoy put'. Nevidimaya revolyutsiya v tret'yem mire [Another way. Invisible revolution in the third world]. Per. s angl. B. Pinsker. M.: Catallax (in Russian).

de Soto E. (2004) Zagadka kapitala. Pochemu kapitalizm torzhestvuyet na Zapade i terpit porazheniye vo vsem ostal'nom mire [The riddle of capital. Why capitalism triumphs in the West and is defeated in the rest of the world]. M: ZAO «Olimp-Biznes» (in Russian).

De Soto H. (1989) The Other Path: The invisible revolution in the third world. New York: Basic Books.

De Soto H. (2000) The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. New York: Basic Books.

Demsetz H. (1967) Toward a Theory of Property Rights. The American Economic Review, 57(2): 347–359.

Epstein R.A. (1985) Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Harvard University Press.

Fernandes E. (2002) The Influence of de Soto's The Mystery of Capital. Land Lines, 14(1): 1–8.

Galiani S., Schargrodsky E. (2010) Property rights for the poor: Effects of land titling. Journal of Public Economics, 94(9): 700–729.

Galindabayeva V.V. (2014) Megasobytiya v postsovetskikh gorodakh: neopatrimonial'nyye mashiny rosta i prisvoyeniye gosudarstvennoy sobstvennosti [Mega-events in post-Soviet cities: neopatrimonial machines of growth and appropriation of state property]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 17(5): 126–140 (in Russian).

Gilbert A. On the mystery of capital and the myths of Hernando de Soto: what difference does legal title make? International Development Planning Review, 2002, 24(1): 1–19.

Hann C.M. (1998) Introduction: the Embeddedness of Property. In: Property Relations: Renewing the Anthropological Tradition, C.M. Hann (ed.). Cambridge: CUP: 1–47.

Hendrix S.E. (1995) Myths of Property Rights. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 12(1): 183–223.

Humphrey C., Verdery K. (2004) Introduction: Raising Questions about Property. In: Property in Question: Value Transformation in the Global Economy. Humphrey C., Verdery K. (eds.). Oxford: Berg: 1–28.

Karbainov N.I. (2010) Strategii obosnovaniya prav sobstvennosti na zemlyu v situatsii pravovogo plyuralizma (na primere zemel'nykh sporov v g. Ulan-Ude) [Strategies for the justification of land ownership in a situation of legal pluralism (on the example of land disputes in Ulan-Ude)]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 13(4): 140–157 (in Russian).

Karbainov N.I. (2014) Kak vladel'tsy (ne) stanovyatsya chastnymi sobstvennikami (na primere zemel'nykh konfliktov v Ulan-Ude i Sochi) [As owners (not) become private owners (on the example of land conflicts in Ulan-Ude and Sochi)]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 17(5): 85–108 (in Russian).

Kasatkina A.K. (2015) Chastnaya sobstvennost' i kollektivnoye tovarishchestvo: rezhimy sobstvennosti i sotsial'nyye otnosheniya v sadovodcheskikh nekommercheskikh tovarishchestvakh leningradskoy oblasti 2000-kh gg [Private property and collective partnership: property regimes and social relations in horticultural non-profit partnerships of the Leningrad region of the 2000s]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 18(1): 163–178 (in Russian).

Kerekes C.B., Williamson C.R. (2008) Unveiling de Soto’s Mystery: Property rights, capital, and development. Journal of Institutional Economics, 4(3): 371–87.

Kingwill R., Cousins B., Cousins T., Hornby D., Royston L., Smit W. (2007) Mysteries and Myths: De Soto, Property and Poverty in South Africa. In: Are Hernando de Soto’s views appropriate to South Africa? Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand: 53–65.

Kirdina S. (2004) Mozhet li uchenyy izmenit' mir? (Hernando de Soto: Zagadka kapitala) [Can a scientist change the world? (Hernando de Soto: The Riddle of Capital)]. Otechestvennyye zapiski, 6(21): 246–252 (in Russian).

Latov Yu.V., Nestik T.A. (2002) «Plokhiye» zakony ili kul'turnyye traditsii? [«Bad» laws or cultural traditions?] Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost [Social Sciences and the Present], 5: 35–47 (in Russian).

Marcuse P. (1996) Privatization and its Discontents: Property Rights in Land and Housing in the Transition in Eastern Europe. In: Cities after socialism: urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies, G. Andrusz, M. Harloe and I. Szelenyi (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers: 119–191.

North D. (1997) Instituty, institutsional'nyye izmeneniya i funktsionirovaniye ekonomiki [Institutions, institutional changes and the functioning of the economy]. M.: Fond ekonomicheskoy knigi Nachala (in Russian).

Nyamu-Musembi C. (2007) De Soto and Land Relations in Rural Africa: breathing life into dead theories about property rights. Third World Quarterly, 28(8): 1457–1478.

Royston L. (2007) Snakes and ladders: A housing perspective on de Soto and the first and second economy debate in South Africa. In: Are Hernando de Soto’s views appropriate to South Africa? Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand: 32–43.

Ryzhova N.P. (2014) Zemlya i vlast': razlichiya v podkhodakh k issledovaniyu sobstvennosti (sluchay neformal'nogo zemlepol'zovaniya kitayskikh fermerov) [Land and power: differences in approaches to property research (the case of informal land use of Chinese farmers)]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 17(5): 7–35 (in Russian).

Scott J.C. (1977) The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. Yale University Press.

Singer J.W. (2000) Entitlement: The Paradoxes of Property. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

Thompson E.P. (1971) The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the 18th Century. Past & Present, 50: 76–136.

Tomlinson M.R. (2007) Are title deeds a silver bullet for accessing credit? In: Are Hernando de Soto’s views appropriate to South Africa? Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand: 17–31.

Tykanova Ye.V., Khokhlova A.M. (2014) Konflikt prav sobstvennosti v postsovetskom gorode (na primere sluchayev snosa garazhey v Sankt-Peterburge) [Conflict of property rights in the post-Soviet city (on the example of cases of demolition of garages in St. Petersburg).]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 17(5): 109–125 (in Russian).

Underkuffler-Freund L. (1996) Property: Special Right. Notre Dame Law Review, 71(5): 1033–1058.

Woodruff C. (2001) Review of de Soto's «The Mystery of Capital». Journal of Economic Literature, 39(4): 1215–1223.

Zhuravskaya T.N. (2014) «Sobstvenniki bez sobstvennosti»: neformal'nyye praktiki v usloviyakh otkrytogo rynka [«Owners without property»: informal practices in an open market]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 17(5): 52–69 (in Russian).