Концепция адаптивной способности: обзор социологических теорий адаптивных и институциональных изменений

К. Кескитало keskitalok@gmail.com

Для цитирования

Кескитало К. Концепция адаптивной способности: обзор социологических теорий адаптивных и институциональных изменений. Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии, 13(5):

Аннотация

Термины «адаптация» и «адаптивная способность» (или «адаптивные возможности») родились первоначально в экологической науке и прежде всего относятся к понятию пищевых цепей и защищенности от рисков вымирания. Позже они стали применяться во многих дисциплинах, в том числе в работах по менеджменту, изучению организаций, изменению политики. Эти труды редко рассматривались, сравнивались или сопоставлялись с тем, чтобы выявить, чем они могли бы быть полезны для понимания адаптивности. Целью данной работы было свести воедино социологические подходы, которые занимаются вопросами институциональной адаптации и в которых обсуждается их применимость к компонентам адаптивных возможностей. В данной работе будет рассматриваться взаимосвязь между новым негосударственным управлением и адаптивными возможностями существующих институтов в области природных ресурсов.

Ключевые слова:

Литература

Adger W.N., Brown K., Tomkins E.L. The Political Economy of Cross-Scale Networks in Resource Co-Management // Ecology and Society. 2005. 10 (2). Р. 9. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art9/

Ahrens J., Rudolph P.M. The Importance of Governance in Risk Reduction and Disaster Management // Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. 2006. Vol. 14. N 4 (Dec. 2006). Р. 207-220.

Appelbaum S.H., Goransson L. Transformational and adaptive learning within the learning organization: a framework for research and application // Learning Organization. 1997. Vol. 4. N 3. Р. 115-128.

Barzelay M., Gallego R. From «New Institutionalism» to «Institutional Processualism»: Advancing Knowledge about Public Management Policy Change // Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions. 2006. Vol. 19. N 4, October. Р. 531-557.

Berkhout F., Hertin J., Gann D.M. Learning to adapt: organisational adaptation to climate change impacts // Climatic Change. 2006. Vol. 78. Р. 135-156.

Bernstein S., Cashore B. Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework // Regulation and Governance. 2007. Vol. 1. Р. 347-371.

Brooks N. Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: A conceptual framework. Tyndall Centre Working Paper N 28, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Manchester, UK. 2003.

Cash D.W., Adger W.N., Berkes F., Garden P., Lebel L., Olsson P., Pritchard L., Young O. Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World // Ecology and Society. 2006. Vol. 11(2). Р. 8. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety. org/vol11/iss2/art8/

Challinor A., Wheeler T., Garforth C., Craufurd P., Kassam A. Assessing the vulnerability of food crop systems in Africa to climate change // Climatic Change. 2007. Vol. 83. Р. 381-399.

Cohen M.D., March J.G., Olsen J.P. A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice // Administrative Science Quarterly. 1972. Vol. 17. N 1. Р. 1-25.

Doyle D., Hogan J. The Importance of Ideas: An A Priori Critical Juncture Framework // Paper presented at the Political Studies Association of Ireland 2006 Annual Conference, University College Cork, 20-22 October 2006. 2007.

Eberlein B, Newman A.L. Escaping the International Governance Dilemma? Incorporated Transgovernmental Networks in the European Union // Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions. 2006. Vol. 21. N 1, January. Р. 25-52.

Feldman M.S., Khademian A.M. The Role of the Public Manager in Inclusion: Creating Communities of Participation // Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions. 2007. Vol. 20. N 2, April. Р. 305-324.

Finnemore M., Sikkink K. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change // International Organization. 1998. Vol. 52. N 4. Р. 887-917.

Few R., Brown K., Tompkins E.L. Climate Change and Coastal Management Decision: Insights from Christchurch Bay, UK // Coastal Management. 2007. Vol. 35. N 2. Р. 255-270.

Foucault M. The Archeology of Knowledge. N.Y.: Pantheon, 1972.

Garavan T. The learning organization: a review and evaluation // Learning Organization. 1997. Vol. 4. N. 1. Р. 18-29.

Garden P., Lebel L., Visekul F., Badenoch N., Chirangworapat C., Prompanyo M. The consequences of institutional interplay and density on local governance in northern Thailand // USER Working Paper 2006-03. Chiang Mai University, Thailand, 2006.

George S. A Fate Worse Than Debt. Suffolk: Penguin Books, 1988.

Grabher G., Stark D. Organizing Diversity: Evolutionary Theory, Network Analysis and Postsocialism // Regional Studies. 1997. Vol. 31. N 5. Р. 533-544.

Habermas J. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1-2. London: Heinemann, 1984.

Hall M. New Zealand tourism entrepreneur attitudes and behaviours with respect to climate change adaptation and mitigation // International Journal Innovation and Sustainable Development. 2006. Vol. 1. N 3. Р. 229-237.

Heward S., Hutchins C., Keleher H. Organizational change - key to capacity building and effective health promotion // Health Promotion International. 2007. Vol. 22. N 2. Р. 170-178.

Humphreys D. Redefining the Issues: NGO Influence on International Forest Negotiations // Global Environmental Politics. 2004. Vol. 4. N 2, May.

Kang N. Analysing 'System Change': The Role of Institutional Complementarity in Corporate Governance // International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility Research Paper. Nottingham: Nottingham University, 2006. N 43.

Keskitalo E.C.H. Climate Change in the Arctic. An Integrative Approach to Vulnerability Assessment. L.: Earthscan, 2008.

Keskitalo E.C.H., Kдhkцnen P., Ojuva J. Can Arctic governance support regional climate change adaptation? // T. Koivurova, E.C.H. Keskitalo, N. Bankes (eds.). Arctic Climate Change. Springer; Hanover, 2008.

Kim J.A. Regime interplay: the case of biodiversity and climate change // Global Environmental Change. 2004. Vol. 14. Р. 315-324.

Kingdon J.W. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston: Little, 1984.

Langridge R., Christian-Smith J., Lohse K.A. Access and Resilience: Analyzing the Construction of Social Resilience to the Threat of Water Scarcity // Ecology and Society. 2006. Vol. 11(2). N 18. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/ art18/

Lebel L., Anderies J.M., Campbell B., Folke C., Hatfield-Dodds S., Hughes T.P., Wilson J. Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems // Ecology and Society. 2006. Vol. 11(1). N 19. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety. org/vol11/iss1/art19/

March J.G., Olsen J.P. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life // American Journal of Political Science. 1984. Vol. 78. N. 3, Sept. Р. 734-749.

Marsh C., Payne D.P. The Globalization of Human Rights and the Socialization of Human Rights Norms // Brigham Young University Law Review. 2007. N 3. Р. 665-688.

Marcussen M., Kaspersen L.B. Globalization and institutional competitiveness // Regulation and Governance. 2007. Vol. 1. Р. 183-196.

Mostert E., Pahl-Wostl C., Rees Y., Searle B., T bara D., Tippett J. Social Learning in European River-Basin Management: Barriers and Fostering Mechanisms from 10 River Basins // Ecology and Society. 2007. Vol. 12(1). N 19 [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety. org/vol12/iss1/art19/

Murphy B.L. Locating social capital in resilient community-level emergency management // Nat Hazards. 2007. Vol. 41. Р. 297-315.

Oktemgil M., Greenley G. Consequences of high and low adaptive capability in UK companies // European Journal of Marketing. 1997. Vol. 31. N 7. Р. 445-466.

Olsson P., Gunderson L.H., Carpenter S.R., Ryan P., Lebel L., Folke C., Holling C.S. Shooting the Rapids: Navigating Transitions to Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems // Ecology and Society. 2006. Vol. 11(1). N 18. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety. org/vol11/iss1/art18/

Ostrom E. Understanding institutional diversity. Princetown: Princetown University Press, 2005.

Plummer R., Armitage D. A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive comanagement: Linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world // Ecological Economics. 2007. Vol. 61. Р. 62-74.

Rayner S., Malone E. Climate change, poverty, and intragenerational equity: the national level // International Journal of Global Environmental Issues. 2001. Vol. 1(2). Р. 175-202.

Rycroft R.W., Kash D.E. Self-organizing innovation networks: implications for globalization // Technovation. 2004. Vol. 24. Р. 187-197.

Sapountzaki K. Social resilience to environmental risks. A mechanism of vulnerability transfer? // Management of Environmental Quality. 2007. Vol. 18. N 3. Р. 274-297.

Sen A. Poverty and famines. An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.

Smith M.Y., Stacey R. Governance and Cooperative Networks: An Adaptive Systems Perspective // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 1997. Vol. 54. Р. 79-94.

Smit B., Wandel J. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability // Global Environmental Change. 2006. Vol. 16. Р. 282-292.

Visseren-Hamakers I.J., Glasbergen P. Partnerships in forest governance // Global Environmental Change. 2007. Vol. 17. Р. 408-419.

Walker B., Elmqvist T., Folke C., Nystr m M., Peterson G., Bengtsson J., Norberg J. Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience // Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2003. Vol. 1. N 9. Р. 488-494.

Young O.R. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2002.

Young O.R. Environmental Governance: The Role of Institutions in Causing and Confronting Environmental Problems // International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. 2003. Vol. 3. Р. 377-393.