Criticism of State Social Policy in the Current Agenda of the Parents Communities

  • L. Shpakovskaya
Keywords: parenthood, parents communities, social policy, child care

Abstract

The article analyzes the discursive practices and cognitive work of parents communities members in St. Petersburg. The author is interested in actual agenda of parent associations. The methodological framework of the study is the discursive approach of civil society and social movements studies. In the frame of the discursive approach, the author uses the concept of the ”ideal of care” offered by a feminist scholar Monique Kremer. The concept of the ideal care sets the focus of interests on how a “good” child care should be organized. Analyzing interviews with organizers, activists and participants of parents communities the author identifies four ideal of care typical for parents: responsibility parents, socially active mothers, the caring State, and civil parents. The article concludes by the description of the main common characteristics of the parenthood semantic field which is constructed by parents communities members.

References

Захаров С. Расширяющиеся границы брака // Демоскоп Weekly. № 237–238. 06-09.03.2006 [http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2006/0237/tema08.php].

Кон И. Мальчик — отец мужчины. М.: Время, 2010.

Майофис М., Кукулин И. Новое родительство и его политические аспекты // Pro et Contra. 2010. № 1–2. C. 6–19.

Печерская Н. Мифология родительства: анализ дискурсивного производства идеальной семьи // Журнал исследований социальной политики. 2012. Т. 10. № 3. С. 323–343.

Салменниеми С. Теория гражданского общества и пост-социализм // Общественные движения в России: точки роста, камни преткновения / Под ред. П.В. Романова, Е.Р. Ярской-Смирновой. М.: ООО «Вариант», 2009. С. 96–120.

Спектор М., Китсьюз Дж. Конструирование социальных проблем // Контексты современности-II. Хрестоматия / Сост. и ред. С.А. Ерофеева. Казань: Изд-во Казанск. ун-та, 2001. С. 160–163.

Чернова Ж. Семейная политика в Европе и России: гендерный анализ. СПб.: Норма, 2008.

Чернова Ж., Шпаковская Л. Молодые взрослые: супружество, партнерство и родительство. Дискурсивные предписания и практики в современной России // Laboratorium. 2010. № 3. С. 19–43.

Шпаковская Л. Политика институционализации и практики приватизации семейной жизни: партнерство и брак в России // Журнал исследований социальной политики. 2012. Т. 10. № 3. С. 309–323.

Chernova Zh. Semeynaya politika v Yevrope i Rossii: gendernyy analiz [Family policies in Europe and Russia: a gender analysis]. SPb.: Norma, 2008.

Chernova Zh., Shpakovskaya L. Molodyye vzroslyye: supruzhestvo, partnerstvo i roditel'stvo. Diskursivnyye predpisaniya i praktiki v sovremennoy Rossii [Young adults: marriage, partnership and parenthood. Discourse regulations and practices in modern Russia], Laboratorium, 2010, 3, pp. 19–43.

Connell R. Masculinities. Polity, 2005.

Giddens A. Modernity and self-identity. Self and society in the late modern age. Polity, 1991.

Kon I. Mal'chik — otets muzhchiny [A boy - the father of man]. M.: Vremya, 2010.

Kremer M. The politics of ideals of care: Danish and Flemish child care policy compared, Social politics: international studies in gender, State and society, 2006, 13, pp. 261–285.

Mayofis M., Kukulin I. Novoye roditel'stvo i yego politicheskiye aspekty [New parenthood and its political dimensions], Pro et Contra, 2010, 1–2, pp. 6–19.

Melucchi A. Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Pecherskaya N. Mifologiya roditel'stva: analiz diskursivnogo proizvodstva ideal'noy sem'i [The Mythology of Parenthood: analysis of the discursive production of the perfect family], Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsial'noy politiki [Journal of Social Policy Studies], 2012, 10(3), pp. 323–343.

Rivkin-Fish M. Pronatalism, gender politics and the renewal of family support in Russia: toward a feminist anthropology of “maternity capital”, Slavic review, 2010, 69(3), pp. 701–724.

Salmenniemi S. Democratization and gender in Contemporary Russia. NY: Routlege, 2008.

Salmenniyemi S. Teoriya grazhdanskogo obshchestva i post-sotsializm [The theory of civil society and post-socialism], in: Obshchestvennyye dvizheniya v Rossii: tochki rosta, kamni pretknoveniya [Social Movement in Russia: the growing point, the stumbling blocks], pod red. P.V. Romanova, Ye.R. Yarskoy-Smirnovoy. M.: OOO «Variant», 2009, pp. 96–120.

Shpakovskaya L. Politika institutsionalizatsii i praktiki privatizatsii semeynoy zhizni: partnerstvo i brak v Rossii [Institutionalization policy and practice of privatization of family life: partnership and marriage in Russia], Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsial'noy politiki [Journal of Social Policy Studies], 2012, 10(3), pp. 309–323.

Spector M., Kitsuse J. Konstruirovaniye sotsial'nykh problem [Constructing social problems], in: Konteksty sovremennosti-II. Khrestomatiya [The contexts of modernity-II. A Reader], sost. i red. S.A. Yerofeyeva. Kazan': Izd-vo Kazansk. un-ta, 2001, pp. 160–163.

Zakharov S. Rasshiryayushchiyesya granitsy braka [Expanding the boundaries of marriage], Demoskop Weekly, 237–238. 06-09.03.2006 [http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2006/0237/tema08.php ].

Published
2013-03-20
How to Cite
Shpakovskaya, L. (2013). Criticism of State Social Policy in the Current Agenda of the Parents Communities . ZHURNAL SOTSIOLOGII I SOTSIALNOY ANTROPOLOGII (The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology), 16(2), 116–130. Retrieved from http://jourssa.ru/jourssa/article/view/731