Interpretations of Russian Civilizational Identity in Western Social Science
Abstract
The article discusses new approaches to the study of civilizational identities in western social science and their use in the field of Russian studies. There was a rise in interest towards civilizational problematics in international relations in the 2010s which was accompanied by rejection of such approaches as the “clash of civilizations” thesis. In opposition to Huntington’s theory new research programs have been formed which focus on “plural and pluralist civilizations” and “civilizational politics”. One of the sources of these new perspectives can be found in the theoretical models of contemporary historical sociology. However, there was a predominance of the constructivist approach to the analysis of civilizational identities which does not fully appreciate the influence of historical legacies on such identities. Western research on Russian civilizational identity also often draws on the constructivist approach and focuses on ideological discourses. In their studies of Russian “civilizationism” western researchers discussed discourses of the political elite and their influence on a broader population. Such studies were based on secondary analysis of survey data as well as on the use of qualitative methods. Theoretical and methodological approaches of western scholars who analyzed Russian civilizational identity deserve careful consideration. Nevertheless, some of the conclusions of such studies need to be complemented or corrected due to their rather limited empirical base.
References
Арнасон Й. (2021) Цивилизационные паттерны и исторические процессы. М.: Новое литературное обозрение.
Браславский Р.Г., Козловский В.В. (2021) Цивилизационное измерение структурирования обществ. Социологическое обозрение, 20(1): 148–175.
Козловский В.В. (ред.) (2021) Российское общество: архитектоника цивилизационного развития. М.; СПб.: ФНИСЦ РАН.
Пабст А. (2021) Цивилизация и либеральная демократия. Полис. Политические исследования, 30(4): 26–42.
Acharya A. (2020) The Myth of the “Civilization State”: Rising Powers and the Cultural Challenge to World Order. Ethics and International Affairs, 34(2): 139–156.
Arnason J. (2015) Elias and Eisenstadt: The Multiple Meanings of Civilization. Social Imaginaries, 1(2): 146–176.
Bassin M. (2016) The Gumilev Mystique: Biopolitics, Eurasianism and the Construction of Community in Modern Russia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Bettiza G. (2014) Civilizational Analysis in International Relations: Mapping the Field and Advancing a “Civilizational Politics” Line of Research. International Studies Review, 16(1): 1–28.
Bettiza G., Bolton D., Lewis D. (2023) Civilizationism and the Ideological Contestation of the Liberal International Order. International Studies Review, 25(2): 1–28.
Bettiza G., Lewis D. (2020) Authoritarian Powers and Norm Contestation in the Liberal International Order: Theorizing the Power Politics of Ideas and Identity. Journal of Global Security Studies, 5(4): 559–577.
Bettiza G., Petito F. (2018) Why (Clash of) Civilizations Discourses Just Won’t Go Away? Understanding the Civilizational Politics of Our Times. In: Orsi D. (ed.) The “Clash of Civilizations” 25 years on: A Multidisciplinary Appraisal. Bristol: E-International Relations: 37–51.
Blackburn M. (2021) Mainstream Russian Nationalism and the “State-Civilization” Identity: Perspectives from Below. Nationalities Papers, 49(1): 89–107.
Brubaker R. (2017) Between Nationalism and Civilizationism: The European Populist Moment in Comparative Perspective. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(8): 1191–1226.
Coker C. (2019) The Rise of the Civilizational State. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hale H., Laruelle M. (2020) Rethinking Civilizational Identity from the Bottom up: A Case Study of Russia and a Research Agenda. Nationalities Papers, 48(3): 585–602.
Hale H., Laruelle M. (2021) A New Wave of Research on Civilizational Politics. Nationalities Papers, 49(4): 597–608.
Katzenstein P. (2010) A World of Plural and Pluralist Civilizations: Multiple Actors, Traditions and Practices. In: Katzenstein P. (ed.) Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives. New York: Routledge: 1–40.
Katzenstein P., Weygandt N. (2017) Mapping Eurasia in an Open World: How the Insularity of Russia’s Geopolitical and Civilizational Approaches Limits its Foreign Policies. Perspectives on Politics, 15(2): 428–442.
Laruelle M. (2016) Russia as an Anti-Liberal European Civilization. In: Kolstø P., Blakkisrud H. (eds.) The New Russian Nationalism: Imperialism, Ethnicity and Authoritarianism, 2000–2015. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press: 275–297.
Linde F. (2016) The Civilizational Turn in Russian Political Discourse: From Pan-Europeanism to Civilizational Distinctiveness. Russian Review, 75(4): 604–625.
Mjør K. (2017) A Morphology of Russia? The Russian Civilisational Turn and its Cyclical Idea of History. In: Lehtisaari K., Mustajoki A. (eds.) Philosophical and Cultural Interpretations of Russian Modernisation. London: Routledge: 44–58.
Scherrer J. (2013) The “Cultural/Civilizational Turn” in Post-Soviet Identity Building. In: Bodin P.-A., Hedlund S., Namli E. (eds.) Power and Legitimacy: Challenges from Russia. London: Routledge: 152–168.
Smith J. (2017) Debating Civilisations: Interrogating Civilisational Analysis in a Global Age. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Turoma S., Mjør K. (2020) Introduction: Russian Civilizationalism in a Global Perspective. In: Mjør K., Turoma S. (eds.) Russia as Civilization: Ideological Discourses in Politics, Media and Academia. Abingdon: Routledge: 1–26.
