Сity as a polis: agonistic practices in the urban environment

  • Denis Letnyakov Institute of Philosophy of the RAS, Moscow, Russia
  • Veronika Sharova Institute of Philosophy of the RAS, Moscow, Russia
Keywords: urban studies, pluralism, political competition, symbolic politics, politics of memory, discursive power, political conflict, agonistic practices

Abstract

The article analyzes a special type of political behavior and political conflict, which the authors propose to call “agonistic”. Based on the works of Chantal Mouffe, Hannah Arendt and others, the concept of agonistics in the public sphere of democratically organized societies, is considered. The article notes that in the urban environment, agonistic conflicts manifest themselves most intensively, which, in particular, is due to the high degree of diversity of elements of the city as a system, as well as the presence in it of objects that have symbolic significance in the process of actors’ competition for the possession of discursive power. It is suggested that the “wars of memory and monuments”, which in recent years have been a significant part of the socio-political life in Europe and the societies of the post-Soviet space, can be interpreted in accordance with this concept. As examples, the authors explore two cases, which are: the debate around the statue of Edward Colston in Bristol, England, and the discussion about the future of the Soviet cultural and architectural heritage in the capital of Latvia, Riga. The article also raises the following question: whether these cases should be considered in the context of a new area of socio-humanitarian knowledge, post-colonial urban studies.

References

Арендт Х. (2000) Vita active, или О деятельной жизни. СПб.: Алетейя.

Бурдье П. (2007) О символической власти. Социология социального пространства. М.: Ин-т экспериментальной социологии; СПб.: Алетейя: 87-96.

Вебер М. (2017) Город. М.: Strelka Press.

Гапоненко А.В. (ред.) (2010) Прибалтийские русские: история в памятниках культуры. Рига: Институт европейских исследований.

Джейкобс Дж. (2011) Смерть и жизнь больших американских городов. М.: Новое издательство.

Зиммель Г. (1909) Социальная дифференциация: социологические и психологические исследования. М.: Издание М. и. С. Сабашниковых.

Малинова О.Ю. (2018) Политика памяти как область символической политики. А.И. Миллер, Д.В. Ефременко (отв. ред.) Методологические вопросы изучения политики памяти. М.; СПб: Нестор-история: 27–53.

Платт К. (2010) Оккупация vs. колонизация: история, постколониальность и географическая идентичность. Случай Латвии. Неприкосновенный запас. №3. [http://www.intelros.ru/readroom/nz/nz_71/6961-okkupaciya-vs-kolonizaciya-istoriya-postkolonialnost-i-geograficheskaya-identichnost-sluchaj-latvii.html] (дата обращения: 30.04.2023).

Росси А. (2015) Архитектура города. М.: Strelka Press.

Терборн Й. (2020) Города власти. Город, нация, народ, глобальность. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики.

Тлостанова М. (2020) Постколониальный удел и деколониальный выбор: постсоциалистическая медиация. Новое литературное обозрение. №1 (161). [https://www.nlobooks.ru/magazines/novoe_literaturnoe_obozrenie/161_nlo_1_2020/article/21972/] (дата обращения: 24.04.2023).

Трубина Е. (2020) Постколониальная критика и урбанистическая теория. Новое литературное обозрение. №1(161). [https://www.nlobooks.ru/magazines/novoe_literaturnoe_obozrenie/161_nlo_1_2020/article/21980/] (дата обращения: 29.04.2023).

Ash A. (2010) Collective Culture and Urban Public Space. In: Urban Diversity. Space, Culture and Inclusive Pluralism in Cities Worldwide / Ed. by C. Kihato et al. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Bell D. (2008) Agonistic Democracy and the Politics of Memory. Constellations, 15(1): 148-166.

Bishop R., Phillips J., Yeo W.W. (eds.) (2013) Postcolonial Urbanism: Southeast Asian Cities and Global Processes. L.: Routledge.

Bull A., Hansen H. (2016) On agonistic memory. Memory Studies, 4(9): 1-15.

Burch-Brown J. (2017) Is it wrong to topple statues and rename schools? Journal of Political Theory and Philosophy, 1: 59-88.

Catterall P. (2017) Changing Attitudes to the Past: Lieux de Memoire and Contested Histories. The Political Quarterly, 4(88): 632-639.

Common Sense. Conservative Thinking For a Post-Liberal Age (2021). Common Sense Group.

Datta A., Shaban A. (eds.) (2016) Mega-Urbanization in the Global South: Fast Cities and New Urban Utopias of the Postcolonial State. L.: Taylor & Francis.

Edensor T., Jayne M. (eds.) (2012) Urban Theory beyond the West: A World of Cities. L.: Routledge.

Mouffe Ch. (2005). On the Political. L.: Routledge.

Mouffe Ch. (2013) Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. L.; NY: Verso.

Ren J. (2020) Postcolonial Urbanism. In: Urban Studies / R. Dilworth (ed.). N.Y.: Oxford University Press.

Published
2024-01-10
How to Cite
Letnyakov, D., & Sharova, V. (2024). Сity as a polis: agonistic practices in the urban environment. ZHURNAL SOTSIOLOGII I SOTSIALNOY ANTROPOLOGII (The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology), 26(4), 136-162. https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2023.26.4.5