The Background of Dependency Theory in Karl Marx’s Works

  • Yuriy Dergunov Donetsk Academy of Management and Public Service,Donetsk, Ukraine
Keywords: Marx, dependency theory, development, underdevelopment, Eurocentrism, capitalism

Abstract

Dependency theory is a theoretical direction in development sociology that examines underdevelopment of peripheral societies as the result of capitalist development on a world scale. Despite the fact that the majority of dependency theorists leaned towards Marxism both in terms of general theoretical grounds and political views. There is a widespread idea among both supporters and opponents of dependency theory, about the radical break of this theory with Karl Marx’s understanding of logics of the social change that makes us to put the problem of the connection between dependency theory and his works. This paper is based on critical realist philosophy of science and descriptive, comparative, retrospective and actualization methods of the discipline of history of sociology for the study of Marx’s theoretical heritage devoted to the development of nonWestern world. It is demonstrated that at the level of general conception of sociohistorical change, we can distinguish two approaches in Marx’s works, the Eurocentricdiffusionist one and the multi-linear one, and multi-linear approach was generally closer to basic principles of Marx’s social theory and predominated in late Marx’s ouevre. This transition to the new theory of social change was connected with revealing of generative mechanisms of specifically capitalist form of underdevelopment in his research on regularities of capitalism. In particular, Marx highlighted the role of world market, the formal subsumption of labor to capital, the international division of labor, the superexploitation of labor-power and the general law of capital accumulation. Also, social movements in non-Western countries played their role, as they shown that their peoples possessed the historical subjectivity. Although Marx did not build the full-blown theory of dependent capitalism due to the incompleteness of his project of critique of political economy, there are reasons to consider Marx as a forerunner of dependency theory in development sociology.

References

Блаут Дж. М. (2017) Марксизм и евроцентристский диффузионизм. Спільне: журнал соціальної критики [https://commons.com.ua/uk/marksizmi-evrotsentristskij-diffuzionizm/] (дата обращения: 5.10.2018).

Валлерстайн И. (2008) Маркс и слаборазвитость. Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг, 1: 50–66.

Городяненко В.В. (1999) Историография социологии? Социологические исследования, 3: 140–144.

Иванов Д.В. (2002) Императив виртуализации. Современные теории общественных изменений. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУ.

Йоас Х., Кнёбль В. (2011) Социальная теория. Двадцать вводных лекций. СПб.: Алетейя.

Маркс К. (1957a) Британское владычество в Индии. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 9. М.: Госполитиздат: 130–136.

Маркс К. (1957b). Будущие результаты британского владычества в Индии.

Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 9. М.: Госполитиздат: 224–230.

Маркс К. (1957c) Восемнадцатое брюмера Луи Бонапарта. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 8. М.: Госполитиздат: 115–217.

Маркс К. (1959) К критике политической экономии. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 13. М.: Госполитиздат: 1–167.

Маркс К. (1960). Капитал. Критика политической экономии. Кн. I. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 23. М.: Госполитиздат: 1–784.

Маркс К.(1961a) Капитал. Критика политической экономии. Кн. III. Ч. I. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 25. Ч. I. М.: Госполитиздат: 3–505.

Маркс К. (1961b) Наброски ответа на письмо В.И. Засулич. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 19. М.: Госполитиздат: 400–421.

Маркс К. (1961с) Письмо в редакцию «Отечественных записок». Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 19. М.: Госполитиздат: 116–121.

Маркс К. (1963a) Теории прибавочной стоимости (IV том «Капитала»). Ч. II. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 26. Ч. II. М.: Госполитиздат: 3–660.

Маркс К. (1963b) Маркс — Энгельсу, 2 ноября 1867 года. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 31. М.: Госполитиздат: 316–318.

Маркс К. (1963c) Маркс — Энгельсу. 30 ноября 1867 года. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 31. М.: Госполитиздат: 336–339.

Маркс К. (1964) Теории прибавочной стоимости (IV том «Капитала»). Ч. III. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 26. Ч. III. М.: Госполитиздат: 3–660.

Маркс К. (1968) Экономические рукописи 1857–1859 годов. Ч. I. Маркс К., Энгел ьс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 46. Ч. I. М.: Госполитиздат: 3–408.

Маркс К. (1969) Экономические рукописи 1857–1859 годов. Ч. II. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 46 Ч. II. М.: Госполитиздат: 5–521.

Маркс К. (1974) Результаты непосредственного процесса производства. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 49. М.: Госполитиздат: 3–136.

Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. (1955a) Манифест коммунистической партии. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 4. М.: Госполитиздат: 419–459.

Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. (1955b) Немецкая идеология. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 3. М.: Госполитиздат: 7–544.

Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. (1955c) Святое семейство. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 3. М.: Госполитиздат: 3–230.

Масловский М.В. (2008) Современные теории модерна и модернизации. Социологический журнал, 2: 31–41.

Саид Э. (2006) Ориентализм. Западные концепции Востока. СПб.: Русский мір.

Энгельс Ф. (1957) Демократический панславизм. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 6. М.: Госполитиздат: 289–306.

Энгельс Ф. (1961a) Англия в 1845 и 1885 годах. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 21. М.: Госполитиздат: 198–205.

Энгельс Ф. (1961b) За Польшу. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 18. М.: Госполитиздат: 553–556.

Энгельс Ф. (1964) Энгельс — Марксу, 19 января 1870 года. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 18. М.: Госполитиздат: 347–349.

Anderson K.B. (2010) Marx at the Margins: On Nationalism, Ethnicity, and NonWestern Societies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Aricó J. (2009) Marx y América Latina. Buenos Aires: Fondo de cultura económica.

Avineri S. (1969) Marx and modernization. The Review of Politics, 31(2): 172–188.

Banerjee D. (1987) The historical problematic of Third World development. Social Scientist, 15(8/9): 3–46.

Berman M. (1982) All that is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity. New York: Penguin Books.

Bhaskar R. (1998) The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of Contemporary Human Sciences. London: Routledge.

Biel R. (2015) Eurocentrism and the Communist Movement. Montreal: Kersplebedeb.

Blaut J.M. (1993) The Colonizer’s Model of the World: Geographical Diffusionism and Eurocentric History. New York: The Guilford Press.

Blaut J.M. (2017) Marksizm i yevrotsentristskiy diffuzionizm [Marxism and eurocentric diffusionism]. Spilne: zhurnal sotsialnoyi krytyky [Commons: Journal of Social Critique]. [https://commons.com.ua/uk/marksizm-i-evrotsentristskijdiffuzionizm/] ((accessed: 5.10.2018) (in Russian).

Blomström M., Hettne B. (1984) Development Theory in Transition: The Dependency Debate and Beyond: Third World Responses. London: Zed Books.

Boatča M. (2015) Global Inequalities Beyond Occidentalism. Farham: Ashgate.

Brenner R. (1977) The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of NeoSmithian Marxism. New Left Review, I/104: 25–92.

Brewer A. (1990) Marxist Theories of Imperialism: A Critical Survey. London: Routledge.

Brown H. (2010) Multilinearism, contingency, and resistance: reevaluating Marx on historical development in precapitalist societies. New Political Science, 32(3): 345–366.

Chandra B. (1981) Karl Marx, his theories of Asian societies, and colonial rule. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 5(1): 13–91.

Collier A. (1994) Critical Realism: An Introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s Philosophy. London: Verso.

D’Elia N. (2018) Disillusioned with the labour movement: late Marx and the prospects of evolution in Western Europe. International Critical Thought, 8(2): 264–276.

Das R.J. (2012) Reconceptualizing capitalism: Forms of subsumption of labor, class struggle, and uneven development. Review of Radical Political Economics, 44(2): 178–200.

Davis H.B. (1965) Nations, colonies and social classes: The position of Marx and Engels. Science and Society, 29(1): 26–43.

Davis H.B. (1967) Capital and imperialism. A landmark in Marxist theory. Monthly Review, 19(4), 59–73.

De Paula P.G. (2015) Main interpretations of Marx’s notion of development: a critical review. Science and Society, 79(4): 582–609.

Di Meglio M., Masina P. (2013) Marx and underdevelopment. In: Fine B., SaadFilho A. (eds.) The Elgar Companion to Marxist Economics. Chetlenham: Elgar: 206–211.

Dos Santos T. (1978) Imperialismo y dependencia. México: Era.

Dussel E. (1985) La producción teórica de Marx. Un comentario a los Grundrisse.México: Siglo XXI.

Dussel E. (1988) Hacia un Marx desconocido. Un comentario de los Manuscritos del 61–63. México: Siglo XXI.

Dussel E. (1990) El último Marx (1863–1882) y la liberación latinoamericana. México: Siglo XXI.

Engels F. (1957) Demokraticheskiy panslavizm [Democratic pan-Slavism]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 6 [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 6]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 289–306 (in Russian).

Engels F. (1961a) Angliya v 1845 i 1885 godakh [England in 1845 and 1885]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 21 [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 21]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 198–205 (in Russian).

Engels F. (1961b) Za Pol’shu [For Poland]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 18 [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 18]. M.: Gospolitizdat: 553–556 (in Russian).

Engels F. (1964) Engels — Marksu, 19 yanvarya 1870 goda [Engels to Marx, January 19, 1870]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 18 [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 18]. M.: Gospolitizdat: 347–349 (in Russian).

Foster J. B., McChesney R. W., Jonna R. J. (2011) The global reserve army of labor and the new imperialism. Monthly Review, 63(6): 1–31.

Foster-Carter A. (1973) Neo-Marxist approaches to development and underdevelopment. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 3(1): 7–33.

Ghosh B.N. (1993) Karl Marx on development and underdevelopment. Indian Economic Journal, 40(4): 13–23.

Gimm G.H. (2016) Marx as a thinker of ‘the global’: the evolution of Marx’s concept of the world market and its place in a broader intellectual context. Marxism 21, 13(3): 210–241.

Gorodyanenko V.V. (1999) Istoriografiya sotsiologii? [The historiography of sociology?] Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 3: 140–144 (in Russian).

Harootunian H. (2015) Marx after Marx: History and Time in the Expansion of Capitalism. New York: Columbia University Press,

Hout W. (2016) Classical approaches to development: modernisation and dependency. In: Gruger J., Hammett D. (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of International Development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 21–39.

Hudis P. (1983) The Third World road to socialism: new perspectives on Marx’s writings from his last decade. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 3(1): 38–52.

Hudis P. (2010) Accumulation, imperialism, and pre-capitalist formations: Luxemburg and Marx on the non-Western world. Socialist Studies / Études socialistes, 6(2): 75–91.

Ivanov D.V. (2002) Imperativ virtualizatsii. Sovremennyye teorii obshchestvennykh izmeneniy [Imperative of Virtualization. Contemporary Theories of Social Change]. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta (in Russian).

Jani P. (2002) Karl Marx, Eurocentrism, and the 1857 Revolt in British India. In: Bartolovich C., Lazarus N. (eds.) Marxism, Modernity and Postcolonial Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 81–97.

Joas H., Knöbl W. (2011) Sotsial’naya teoriya. Dvadtsat’ vvodnykh lektsiy [Social Theory: Twenty Introductory Lectures]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteyya (in Russian).

Kalmring S., Nowak A. (2017) Viewing Africa with Marx: remarks on Marx’s fragmented engagement with the African continent. Science and Society, 81(3): 331–347.

Katz C. (2016) Marx y la periferia. Rebelión [http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=210447] (accessed 5.10.2018)

Katz S. (1990) The problems of Europocentrism and evolutionism in Marx’s writings on colonialism. Political Studies, 38(4): 672–686.

Kitching G. (1982) Development and Underdevelopment in Historical Perspective: Populism, Nationalism and Industrialisation. London: Routledge.

Kohan N. (1998) Marx en su (Tercer) Mundo. Hacia un socialismo no colonizado. Buenos Aires: Biblos.

Larraín J. (1989) Theories of Development: Capitalism, Colonialism and Dependency. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Lim J.-H. (1992) Marx’s theory of imperialism and the Irish national question. Science and Society, 56(2): 163–178.

Lindner K. (2010) Marx’s Eurocentrism. Postcolonial studies and Marx scholarship. Radical Philosophy, 161: 27–41.

Marini R.M. (1973) Dialéctica de la Dependencia. México: Siglo XXI.

Marx K. (1957a) Britanskoye vladychestvo v Indii [The British Rule in India]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 9 [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 9]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 130–136 (in Russian).

Marx K. (1957b). Budushchiye rezul’taty britanskogo vladychestva v Indii [The future results of British rule in India]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 9 [Works, 2nd ed. Vol. 9]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 224–230 (in Russian).

Marx K. (1957c) Vosemnadtsatoye bryumera Lui Bonaparta [The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 8 [Works. 2nd ed, Vol. 8]. M.: Gospolitizdat: 115–217 (in Russian).

Marx K. (1959) K kritike politicheskoy ekonomii [A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 13 [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 13]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 1–167 (in Russian).

Marx K. (1960). Kapital. Kritika politicheskoy ekonomii. Kn. I [Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. I]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 23 [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 23]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 1–784 (in Russian).

Marx K. (1961a). Kapital. Kritika politicheskoy ekonomii. Kn. III. Ch. I. [Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. III. Part I]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 25. Ch. 1 [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 25. Part I]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 3–505 (in Russian).

Marx K. (1961b) Nabroski otveta na pis’mo V.I. Zasulich [Drafts of a reply to Vera Zasulich’s letter]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 19 [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 19]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 400–421 (in Russian).

Marx K. (1961c) Pis’mo v redaktsiyu «Otechestvennykh zapisok» [Letter to the editorial board of ‘Otechestvennye Zapiski’]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 19 [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 19]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 116–121 (in Russian).

Marx K. (1963a)Teorii pribavochnoy stoimosti (IV tom «Kapitala»). Ch. II [Theories of Surplus Value (The Vol. IV of Capital). Part II]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 26. Ch. II [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 26. Part II]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 3–660 (in Russian).

Marx K. (1963b) Marks — Engel’su, 2 noyabrya 1867 goda [Marx to Engels, November 2, 1867]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 31 [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 31]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 316–318 (in Russian).

Marx K. (1963c) Marks — Engel’su. 30 noyabrya 1867 goda [Marx to Engels, November 30, 1867]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 31 [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 31]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 336–339 (in Russian).

Marx K. (1964) Teorii pribavochnoy stoimosti (IV tom «Kapitala»). Ch. III [Theories of Surplus Value (The Vol. IV of Capital). Part III]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 26. Ch. III [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 26. Part III]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 3–660 (in Russian).

Marx K. (1968) Ekonomicheskiye rukopisi 1857–1859 godov. Ch. I [Grundrisse. Foundations for the Critique of Political Economy. Part I]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 46. Ch. I [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 46. Part I]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 3–408 (in Russian).

Marx K. (1969) Ekonomicheskiye rukopisi 1857–1859 godov. Ch. II [Grundrisse. Foundations for the Critique of Political Economy. Part II]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 46. Ch. II [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 46. Part II]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 5–521 (in Russian).

Marx K. (1974) Rezul’taty neposredstvennogo protsessa proizvodstva [Results of the direct production process]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 49 [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 49]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 3–136 (in Russian).

Marx K., Engels F. (1955a) Manifest kommunisticheskoy partii [The Manifesto of Communist Party]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 4 [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 4]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 419–459 (in Russian).

Marx K., Engels F. (1955b) Nemetskaya ideologiya [The German Ideology]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 3 [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 3]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 7–544 (in Russian).

Marx K., Engels F. (1955c) Svyatoye semeystvo [The Holy Family]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-ye izd. T. 3 [Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 3]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat: 3–230 (in Russian).

Maslovskiy M.V. (2008) Sovremennyye teorii moderna i modernizatsii [Contemporary theories of modernity and modernization]. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal [Sociological Journal], 2: 31–41 (in Russian).

Melotti U. (1977) Marx and the Third World. London: Macmillan.

Mohri K. (1979) Marx and ‘underdevelopment’. Monthly Review, 30(11): 32–42.

Nimtz A, (2002) The Eurocentric Marx and other related myths. In: Bartolovich C.,Lazarus N. (eds.) Marxism, Modernity and Postcolonial Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 65–80.

Oculi O. (1974) On Marx’s attitude to colonialism. African Review, 4(3): 459–471.

Osorio J. (2016) Teoría marxista de la dependencia Historia, fundamentos, debates y contribuciones. México: Itaca / UAM-Xochimilco.

Overbeek H., Silva P. (1986) Marx y el Tercer Mundo. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 48 (1): 115–134.

Palma G. (1981) Dependency and development: a critical overview. In: Seers D. (ed.) Dependency Theory: A Critical Reassessment. London: Pinter: 20–78.

Portes A. (2015) The sociology of development: from modernization to institutional turn. Sociology of Development, 1(1): 20–42.

Pradella L. (2013) Imperialism and capitalist development in Marx’s Capital. Historical Materialism, 21(2): 117–147.

Pradella L. (2015) Globalisation and the Critique of Political Economy. New Insights from Marx’s Writings. London: Routledge.

Pradella L. (2017a) Marx and the Global South: connecting history and value theory. Sociology, 51(1): 146–161.

Pradella L. (2017b) Postcolonial theory and the making of world working class. Critical Sociology, 43(4–5): 573–586.

Ramirez-Faria C. (1991) The Origins of Economic Inequality Between Nations: A Critique of Western Theories of Development and Underdevelopment. London: Routledge.

Rosdolsky R. (1991) Engels and the “Nonhistoric” Peoples: The National Question in the Revolution of 1848. Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory, 18: 1–295.

Said E. (2006) Oriyentalizm. Zapadnyye kontseptsii Vostoka [Orientalism. Western Conceptions of the Orient]. St.-Petersburg: Russkiy mír (in Russian).

Salujian A., Augusto A.G., de Miranda F.F., Correa H.F., Carcanholo M.D. (2013) Marx’s theory of history and the question of colonies and non-capitalist world. IE-UFRG Discussion Paper [http://www.ie.ufrj.br/images/pesquisa/publicacoes/discussao/2013/TD_IE_015_2013.pdf] (accessed 5.10.2018).

Sayer D. (1979) Marx’s Method: Ideology, Science, and Critique in Capital. Harmondsworth: The Humanities Press.

Sayer D., Corrigan Ph. (1983) Late Marx: continuity, contradiction and learning. In: Shanin T. (ed.) Late Marx and the Russian Road: Marx and the ‘Peripheries of Capitalism’. New York: Monthly Review Press: 3–39.

Shanin T. (1983) Late Marx: gods and craftsmen. In: Shanin T. (ed.) Late Marx and the Russian Road: Marx and the ‘Peripheries of Capitalism’. New York: Monthly Review Press: 77–94.

So A. Y. (1990) Social Change and Development: Modernization, Dependency and World-System Theories. London: Sage.

Stedman Jones G. (2007) Radicalism and extra-European world: the case of Karl Marx. In: Bell D. (ed.) Victorian Visions of Global Order: Empire and International Relations in Nineteenth-Century Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 186–214.

Sunar L. (2014) Marx and Weber on Oriental Societies: In the Shadow of Western Modernity. Farham: Ashgate.

Therborn G. (2008) From Marxism to Post-Marxism. London: Verso.

Viterna J., Robertson C. (2015) New directions for the sociology of development. Annual Review of Sociology, 41: 243–269.

Vujačić I. (1988) Marx and Engels on development and underdevelopment: the restoration of a certain coherence. History of Political Economy, 20(3): 471–498.

Wada H. (1983) Marx and revolutionary Russia. In: Shanin T. (ed.) Late Marx and the Russian Road: Marx and the ‘Peripheries of Capitalism’. New York: Monthly Review Press: 40–76.

Wallerstein I. (2008) Marks i slaborazvitost’ [Marx and underdevelopment]. Sotsiologiya: teoriya, metody, marketing [Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing], 1: 50–66 (in Russian).

Warren B. (1980) Imperialism, Pioneer of Capitalism. London: Verso.

Published
2018-12-19
How to Cite
Dergunov, Y. (2018). The Background of Dependency Theory in Karl Marx’s Works. ZHURNAL SOTSIOLOGII I SOTSIALNOY ANTROPOLOGII (The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology), 21(5), 59-90. https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2018.21.5.4