Normative Knowledge in the Social Sciences (Based on Nikolay I. Kareev’s Manuscript “General Methodology of the Humanities”)

  • Alexey Malinov Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
  • Evgeniya Dolgova Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia
Keywords: Kareev, methodology, ethics, normative knowledge, comparative method

Abstract

The article and the accompanying publication of archival documents introduce a fragment of a historian, sociologist, and scientific methodologist N.I. Kareyev's work “General Methodology of the Humanities” (1922). The published excerpt is devoted to the relationship of theoretical, practical and normative knowledge. Theoretical knowledge reveals the laws of phenomena, practical knowledge is focused on solving applied (technical) problems, and normative knowledge grasps social reality on the basis of existing (accepted) norms and values. Kareev tried to formulate the ideal of scientific ethics as a normative doctrine that cognizes the actions of people and reveals norms of behavior. In a broad sense, the project of scientific ethics coincided with the tasks of social philosophy. An ethical point of view, or rather a moral assessment is acceptable in the study of social phenomena, but likewise ethics itself can be investigated in its specific forms and manifestations. The identification of ethical elements in social facts (legal, economic, political) made it possible, Kareev believed, to study morality as a social phenomenon. The main aid in this matter was the comparative method. The comparison was mainly supposed to establish similar and repetitive features in social phenomena and thus reveal the specifics of ethical relations. The text is published according to modern spelling rules, maintaining the stylistic features of the document.

References

Бродский А.И. (2014) Морализаторство и насилие с логико-семантической точки зрения. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Серия 17. Философия. Конфликтология. Культурология. Религиоведение, 1: 5–11.

Долгова Е.А., Малинов А.В. (2017) «Понять чужую душу»: фрагменты из неопубликованного труда историка, социолога, методолога науки Н.И. Кареева. Вестник архивиста, 4: 236–247.

Козловский В.В., Браславский Р.Г. (2017) В.О. Ключевский как исторический социолог и теоретик цивилизации. В.О. Ключевский: воспоминания и исследования. СПб.: Санкт-Петербургский политехнический университет Петра Великого: 219–256.

Куприянов В.А. (2019) Европейский либерализм в зеркале политической философии И.А. Ильина. Философский полилог: журнал Международного центра изучения русской философии, 2(6): 59–76.

Разеев Д.Н. (2019) Свобода воли и когнитивный механизм выбора. Вестник Томского государственного университета, 439: 110–114.

Трофимова Е.А. (2012) Космизм в культуре Серебряного века. СПб.: СПбГИЭУ.

Шиповалова Л.В. (2015) Объективность: путь от само собой разумеющегося к очевидному. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Серия 17.

Философия. Конфликтология. Культурология. Религиоведение, 2: 46–52.

Источники

Кареев Н.И. (2017) Общая методология гуманитарных наук. Глава 2. Логические предпосылки всякой методологии. Социологическое обозрение, 3: 327–365.

Кареев Н.И. (2020) Общая методология гуманитарных наук. Социология науки и технологий, 2: 64–85.

Кареев Н.И. (2020) Теоретические гуманитарные науки (фрагмент главы VI рукописи «Общая методология гуманитарных наук»). Социологические исследования, 8: 132–136.

Кареев Н.И. (1919) Общие основы социологии. Пг.: Наука и школа.

Кареев Н.И. (1897) Введение в изучение социологии. СПб.: тип. М.М. Стасюлевича.

Лаппо-Данилевский А.С. (2017) О теории ценности (фрагменты). Вопросы философии, 4: 182–190.

Brodsky A.I. (2014) Moralizatorstvo i nasilie s logiko-semanticheskoj tochki zreniya [Moralizing and violence from a logical and semantic point of view]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 17. Filosofiya. Konfliktologiya. Kulturologiya. Religiovedenie [Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University. Series 17. Philosophy. Conflictology. Culturology. Religious studies], 1: 5–11 (in Russian).

Dolgova E.A., Malinov A.V. (2017) “Ponyat` chuzhuyu dushu”: Fragmenty` iz neopublikovannogo truda istorika, sociologa, metodologa nauki N.I. Kareeva ["To understand someone else's soul": Fragments from the unpublished work of the historian, sociologist, and methodologist of science Nikolay I. Kareev]. Vestnik arkhivista [Herald of an Archivist], 4: 236–247 (in Russian).

Kozlovsky V.V., Braslavsky R.G. (2017). V.O. Klyuchevskij kak istoricheskij sociolog i teoretik civilizacii [V. O. Klyuchevsky as a historical sociologist and theorist of civilization]. In: V.O. Klyuchevsky: vospominaniya i issledovaniya [V.O. Klyuchevsky: memoirs and research]. St. Petersburg: Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University: 219–256 (in Russian).

Kupriyanov V.A. (2019) Evropeyskiy liberalizm v zerkale politicheskoj filosofii I.A. Ilyina [European liberalism in the mirror of I.A. Ilyin's political philosophy]. Filosofskiy polylog [Philosophical polylogue], 2: 53–71 (in Russian).

Razeev D.N. (2019) Svoboda voli i kognitivny`j mexanizm vy`bora [Freedom of will and the cognitive mechanism of choice]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Tomsk state University], 439: 110–114 (in Russian).

Trofimova E.A. (2012) Kosmizm v kul`ture Serebryanogo veka [Cosmism in the culture of the Silver age]. St. Petersburg: SPBGIUE (in Russian).

Shipovalova L.V. (2015) Obyektivnost: put ot samo soboj razumeyushhegosya k ochevidnomu [Objectivity: the path from the self-evident to the obvious]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 17. Filosofiya. Konfliktologiya. Kulturologiya. Religiovedenie [Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University. Series 17. Philosophy. Conflictology. Culturology. Religious studies], 2: 46–52 (in Russian).

Published
2022-09-15
How to Cite
Malinov, A., & Dolgova, E. (2022). Normative Knowledge in the Social Sciences (Based on Nikolay I. Kareev’s Manuscript “General Methodology of the Humanities”) . ZHURNAL SOTSIOLOGII I SOTSIALNOY ANTROPOLOGII (The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology), 25(3), 41-57. Retrieved from http://jourssa.ru/jourssa/article/view/2396