The Concept of a Society of Social Freedom by Axel Honneth

  • Svyatoslav Shachin Murmansk Arctic State University, Murmansk, Russia
  • Anna Shachina Murmansk Arctic State University, Murmansk, Russia
Keywords: identity, recognition, invisibility, freedom, modernization, socialism

Abstract

The article shows the logic of the theoretical development of Axel Honneth in the direction of comprehending the basic principles of a reasonable society, corresponding to the human dignity of everyone, understanding the key causes of the current state of injustice and the ways of transition from an unjust society to a reasonable one. An unjust society is a society filled with social pathologies and pathologies in the self-consciousness of its members, and the fight against injustice is the path to restoring personal and collective identity. A. Honneth understands the self-identity as a product of sociality, i.e., identity arises through the fact that each recognizes himself in the other (and the other does this in sync with me). Consequently, personal and collective identity can only be maintained jointly if developed relations of mutual recognition of individuals are formed at all three main levels: love (at the level of the individual as a bodily being), law (at the level of abstract individuality) and solidarity (at the level of a specific individual, capable of realizing their subjective abilities in activities). Violations of recognition (at the first level this is violence, at the second — deprivation of a person's social rights, at the third — refusal to recognize personal achievements) generate various forms of social conflicts and trigger the struggle for recognition, which acts as the main driving force behind the development of society. Exploring the phenomenology of recognition, A. Honneth shows that it is based on the ability of the participants in the interactions to mutually commit moral self-restraint. Moreover: recognition is primary and precedes the cognitive identification of the other, but the refusal to recognize the other is equivalent to consciously making some subject invisible, which ultimately gives rise to personality pathologies in all participants in the disturbed interactions. Further, A. Honneth showed that the formation of relations of mutual recognition is a process of gradual development of that reasonable potential, which is hidden in the institutional system of modernity and to which the oppressed appeal, proposing and seeking a more just social order. In another way, A. Honneth calls this process modernization and substantiates that its main principle is the realization of the universal value of freedom in its three main forms: negative, reflexive and social freedom. These forms of freedom must be present at the same time and complement each other in the three main spheres of society: family, civil society and the state. In the course of modernization, socialism gradually emerges as a society of developed social freedom, when each person feels support in his life, in the process of goal-setting and goal-setting of a reasonable institutional environment. At the same time, each subject, even when setting goals, considers others not just as allies, but as partners, the implementation of whose goals he should contribute, since the success of achieving my goals depends on the success of their achievement of their goals. Thus, A. Honneth shows that the natural result of modernization is the emergence of socialism as a society of developed social freedom.

Acknowledgments
The reported study was funded by RFBR and FRLC, project number 20-511-23002 “Migration of Ideas and Formation of National Philosophical Traditions: Dialogues Over Borders”

References

Кант И. (1997) Основоположения к метафизике нравов. Кант И. Соч. в 4 т. на рус, и нем. яз. Т. 3. М.: Московский филос. фонд: 39–276.

Кожуховский П.С. (2016) Концепция трех измерений А. Хоннета. Философская мысль, 2: 91–104.

Михайлов И.А. (2012) «Борьба за признание»: идея признания в социально-критической философии А. Хоннета. И.И. Блауберг (отв. ред.) Западная философия конца XX — начала XXI в. Идеи. Проблемы. Тенденции. М.: ИФРАН: 64–103.

Хоннет А. (2009) Невидимость. О моральной эпистемологии признания. Пер. с нем. А. Шачиной и С. Шачина. Кантовский сборник, 1(29): 79–91.

Шачина А.Ю., Шачин С.В. (2018) К вопросу о демократической основе нравственности в образовании. Педагогика, 2018, 9: 19–23.

Gadamer H.-G. (1980) Replik. In: Apel K.-O., Habermas J. (Hrsg.) Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik: Theorie-Diskussion. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag: 283–317 (in German).

Habermas J. (1968) Erkenntnis und Interesse. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag (in German).

Habermas J. (1994) Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaates. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag (in German).

Honneth A. (1994) Kampf um Anerkennung: Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag (in German).

Honneth A. (2009) Nevidimost’: o moral’noj epistemologiji proznanija [Invisibility. On the moral epistemology of recognition]. Transl. from German into Russian by A. Shachina and S. Shachin. Kantovskij sbornik [The Kantian collection], 1(29): 79–91 (in Russian).

Honneth A. (2010a) Von der Begierde zur Anerkennung. Hegels Begründung von Selbstbewusstsein. In: Honneth A. Das Ich im Wir. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag: 15–32 (in German).

Honneth A. (2010b) Das Gewebe der Gerechtigkeit. Über die Grenzen des zeitgenössischen Prozeduralismus. In: Honneth A. Das Ich im Wir. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag: 51–78 (in German).

Honneth A. (2010c) Anerkennung als Ideologie: Zum Zusammenhang von Moral und Macht. In: Honneth A. Das Ich im Wir. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag: 103–131 (in German).

Honneth A. (2011) Das Recht der Freiheit: Grundriss einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag (in German).

Honneth A. (2012) Erziehung und demokratische Öffentlichkeit: Ein vernachlässigtes Kapitel der politischen Philosophie. In: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaften, 15: 429–442 (in German).

Honneth A. (2015) Die Idee des Sozialismus: Versuch einer Aktualisierung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag (in German).

Kant I. (1997) Osnovopolozheniya k metafisike nravov [Foundations for the metaphysics of morals]. In: Kant I. Sochinenija v 4-kh tomah na russkom i nemezkom yasikah [Works in 4 vols. in Russian and German]. Vol. 3. Moscow: Moscow Philosophy foundation: 39–276 (in Russian).

Keckeisen W. (1992) Kritische Erziehungswissenschaft. In: Lenzen D., Mollenhauer K. (Hrsg.) Enzyklopädie Erziehungswissenschaft. Bd. 1: Theorien und Grundbegriffe der Erziehung und Bildung. 2. Aufl. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta: 119–120 (in German).

Kozhukhovskiy P.S. (2016) Contseptsiya tryokh izmereniy Honneta [The concept of three dimensions by A. Honneth]. Filosofskaya mysl [Philosophical Thought], 2: 91–104 (in Russian).

Mikhaylov I.A. (2012) “Bor’ba sa priznanije”: ideya priznanija v sozial’no-kriticheskoj filosofii A. Honneta [“Struggle for Recognition”: The Idea of Recognition in the Social Critical Philosophy of A. Honnett]. In: Blauberg I.I. (ed.) Zapadnaya filosofija konza XX — nachala XXI vv. Ideji. Problemi. Tendenziji. [Western philosophy of the late XX — early XXI century. Ideas. Problems. Trends] Moscow: Publishing House of the Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences: 64–103 (in Russian).

Rosa H. (2013) Beschleunigung und Entfremdung — Entwurf einer kritischen Theorie spätmoderner Zeitlichkeit. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag (in German).

Shachina A., Shachin S. (2018) K voprosu o demokraticheskoj osnove nravstvennosti v obrazovaniji [To the question about the democratic basis of morality in education]. Pedagogika [Pedagogy], 9: 19–23 (in Russian).

Published
2022-02-05
How to Cite
Shachin, S., & Shachina, A. (2022). The Concept of a Society of Social Freedom by Axel Honneth. ZHURNAL SOTSIOLOGII I SOTSIALNOY ANTROPOLOGII (The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology), 25(1), 52-69. Retrieved from http://jourssa.ru/jourssa/article/view/2358