Междисциплинарный подход к российской модернизации
Аннотация
В cтатье предлагается междисциплинарный подход для анализа современной российской модернизации. Хотя сама по себе идея междисциплинарности не нова, внимание к этому подходу возрастает, как в философии науки, так и в научной политике. Следуя за аргументацией Уильяма Х. Ньюэлла, автор предполагает, что изучение российской модернизации является многогранным и когерентным процессом и, следовательно, должно быть междисциплинарным. На этой основе может быть разработана новая парадигма для изучения социетального развития России. Предлагаются исходные точки для интеграции подходов, касающихся российской модернизации. Утверждается, что новый синтез не должен опираться ни на слишком сильную философию истории, ни на слишком сильную социальную онтологию. Тем не менее, телеологические и всеобъемлющие рассуждения нельзя просто заменить эмпирическими подробностями. Скорее, нам необходимо несколько слоев междисциплинарного концептуального и методологического синтеза.Литература
Aalto P. (ed.) The EU-Russia Energy Dialogue: Europe’s Future Energy Security. Aldershot, 2007.
Abdikerova G. Evraziiskaia mental’nost’ kak osnova sozdaniia integral’noi modeli sotsializatsii lichnosti. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, 2009, 9, 42–47.
Alexander J.C., Giesen B. & Mast J.L. (eds.) Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual. Cambridge, 2006.
Arnason J.P. The Future that Failed: Origins and Destinies of the Soviet Model. London, 1993.
Barry A., Born G. & Weszkalnys G. Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society, 2008, 37(1), 20–49.
Berdahl D., Bunzl M. & Lampland M. (eds.) Altering States: Ethnographies of Transition in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Ann Arbor, 2000.
Burawoy M. & Verdery K. (eds.) Uncertain Transition: Ethnographies of change in the Postsocialist World. Lanham, 1999.
Cohen S.F. Russian Studies without Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 1999, 15(1), 37–55.
Danilevskii N. Rossiia i Evropa. Vzgliad na Kulturnye Tsennosti i Politicheskiye Otnosheniia Slavianskogo Mira k Germano-Romanskomu. Moscow, 1869/2003.
Dugin A. Osnovy geopolitiki: geopoliticheskoe budushchee Rossii. Moscow, 1997.
Dugin A. Absoliutnaia rodina. Moscow, 1999.
Eisenstadt S.N. Die Vielfalt der Moderne. Weilerswist, 2000.
Giddens A. The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge, 1984.
Heusala A. The Transitions of Local Administration Culture in Russia. Helsinki, 2005.
Holland J. Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Cambridge, 1995.
Joutsenoja M. Talcott Parsons and the System of Social Sciences, in: Kahla E. (ed.) Between Utopia and Apocalypse. Essays on Social Theory and Russia. Jyväskylä, 2011.
Kirdina S. Teoriia institutional’nykh matrits: v poiskakh novoi paradigmi. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoi antropologii, 2001, 4(1), 101-115.
Kivinen M. The Sacred and the Profane in Russia – a Durkheimian interpretation. The Finnish Review for Russian and East European Studies. Special Issue / The VI ICCEES World Congress, 2000, Vol. 7, 6–26.
Kivinen M. Progress and Chaos. Saarijärvi, 2002.
Kivinen M. Classes in the Making? Russian Social Structure in Transition, in: Therborn G. (ed.) Inequalities of the World. London, 2006.
Kivinen M. & Nikula J. Issleduya perekhodnyi period. Mir Rossii, 2006, 15(1), 50-75.
Kivinen M. & Nikula J. Transition tutkimus, in: Nikula, J. (ed.) Katse Venäjään: suomalaisen Venäjätutkimuksen antologia. Helsinki, 2006.
Kivinen M. Russian Societal Development: Challenges Open, in: Haukkala, H. & Saari S. (eds.) Russia, Lost or Found. Helsinki, 2009.
Kivinen M. Sotsiologiia i vyzovi postsovetskoi epokhi, in: Vivat Jadov! K 80-letnemu jubileiu. Moscow, 2009.
Kivinen M. Perestroika and leftwing fundamentalism – Model Variables of Previous Russian Modernisation, in: History of Contemporary Russia: Problems, Documents, Facts (1985–1999). Moscow, 2011.
Kivinen M., Aalto P., Dusseault D. & Kennedy M.D. Russia’s energy relations in Europe and the Far East: Towards a Social Structurationist Approach to Energy Policy Formation. Article manuscript accepted to Journal of International Relations and Development, 2013. Forthcoming.
Klein J. Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, 1990.
Klein J. & Newell W. Advancing interdisciplinary studies, in: Gaff, J. & Ratcliffe, J. (eds.) Handbook of the undergraduate curriculum: A comprehensive guide to purposes, structures, practices, and changes. San Francisco, 1997.
Kotkin S. Magnetic Mountain: Stalinism as a Civilisation. Berkeley, 1995.
Lane D. Post-State Socialism: a Diversity of Capitalisms? In: Lane, D. & Myant, M. (eds.) Varieties of Capitalism in Post-Communist Countries. Basingstoke & New York, 2006.
Larjavaara I. Funktionaalinen transitioteoria: Hallinto, oikeusjärjestys ja instituutiot Venäjällä. Helsinki, 2007.
Ledeneva A. Unwritten Rules: How Russia Really Works. London, 2001.
Mandel R.E. & Humphrey C. (eds.) Markets and Moralities: Ethnographies of Postsocialism. Oxford & New York, 2002.
Medvedev D. Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. Archive.kremlin.ru. http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2009/11/12/1321_type70029type8291... (accessed February 21, 2013). Moscow, 2009.
Mills C.W. The Sociological Imagination. New York, 1959.
Mäki U. Economics Imperialism: Concept and Constraints. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2009, 39(3), 351-80.
Newell W.H. A Theory of Interdisciplinary Studies. Issues in Integrative Studies, 2001, 19, 1-25.
Newell W. & Meek J. What can public administration learn from complex systems theory? In: Morçöl G. & Dennard L. (eds.) New sciences for public administration policy. Burke, 2000.
Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie. 2009, 100.
Nowotny H. Science in search of its audience. Nova Acta Leopoldina, 2003, 87(325), 211-15.
Nowotny H., Scott P. & Gibbons M. Rethinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, 2001.
Nureev R. Rossiia: osobennosti institutsional’nogo razvitiia. Moscow, 2009.
Parsons T. The Social System. Glencoe, 1951.
Parsons T. Sociological Theory and Modern Society. London, 1967.
Parsons T. The Social System. London, 1970.
Parsons T. Action Theory and the Human Condition. New York, 1978.
Parsons T. & Shils E. (eds.) Toward a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, 1951.
Pastukhov V. Zateriannii mir: Russkoe obshschestvo i gosudarstvo v mezhkul’turnom prostranstve. Obschestvennye nauki i Sovremennost’, 2006, 2, 5-28.
Pipes R. Russia under the Old Regime. 2nd ed. London, 1997.
Rosefielde S. The Russian Economy: From Lenin to Putin. London, 2007.
Sachsenmaier D., Riedel J. & Eisenstadt S.N. (eds.) Reflections on Multiple Modernities: European, Chinese and Other Interpretations. Leiden & Boston, 2002.
Schmidt V.H. Multiple Modernities or Varieties of Modernity? Current Sociology, 2006, 5 4(1), 77-97.
Srubar I. War der reale Sozialismus moderne? Versuch einer strukturellen Bestimmung. Kölner Zeitscrift fur Soziologie und Sozial Psychologie, 1991, Vol. 42, 415-432.
Therborn G. Routes to/through modernity, in: Featherstone M., Lash S. & Robertson R. (eds.) Global modernities. London, 1995.
Wagner P. Modernity as Experience and Interpretation. A New Sociology of Modernity. Cambridge, 2008.
Wallerstein I. Open the social sciences: Report of the Gulbekian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences. Stanford, 1996.
