Социологические модели современного цивилизационного анализа

  • Руслан Браславский йСоциологический институт РАН, Федеральный центр теоретической и прикладной социологии Российской академии наук, Санкт-Петербург, Россияй

Аннотация

In the currently forming sociological paradigm of civilizational analysis, there are four main models: process, configuration, interaction, relational. These models correlate with the approaches to historical inquiry: universal history, local history, translocal history, and global history, respectively. Sociological models of civilizational analysis are, as a rule, challenges to the dominant methodological attitudes and ontological assumptions within the frameworks of the historical studies. The four highlighted models are considered rather not as independent directions diverging from each other, but as components of the research program of civilizational analysis in sociology that are in a dialogical relationship with each other. They focus on different aspects of sociohistorical reality and reflect the different degrees and forms of its structuredness. Further development of the research program of civilizational analysis in sociology presupposes a closer conjugation of the interpretative-institutional approach of the pluralistic theory of civilizational patterns and interactions presented in the works of B. Nelson, S. Eisenstadt, J. Arnason, B. Wittrock and other sociologists, with the process-relational methodology of figurative sociology by N. Elias and his followers.

Литература

Arnason J.P. (1987) Figurational Sociology as a Counter-Paradigm. Theory, Culture, Society, 4(2–3): 429–456.

Arnason J.P. (2001a) Civilizational Analysis, History of. In: Smelser N.J. (ed.) Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. London: Elsevier: 1909–1915.

Arnason J.P. (2001b) Civilizational Patterns and Civilizing Processes. International Sociology, 16(3): 387–405.

Arnason J.P. (2003) Civilizations in Dispute: Historical Questions and Theoretical Traditions. Leiden and Boston: Brill.

Arnason J.P. (2006) Understanding Intercivilizational Encounters. Thesis Eleven, 86(1): 39–53.

Arnason J.P. (2010a) Interpreting History and Understanding Civilizations. In: Joas H., Klein В. (eds.) The Benefit of Broad Horizons: Intellectual and Institutional Preconditions for a Global Social Science: Festschrift for Bjorn Wittrock on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday. Leiden; Boston: Brill: 167–184.

Arnason J.P. (2010b) The Cultural Turn and the Civilizational Approach. European Journal of Social Theory, 13(1): 67–82.

Arnason J.P. (2012) Ponimanie tsivilizatsionnoj dinamiki: vvodnye zamechaniya [Making Sense of Civilizational Dynamics: Introductory Remarks]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 6: 18–29 (in Russian).

Arnason J.P. (2015) Elias and Eisenstadt: The Multiple Meanings of Civilisation. Social Imaginaries, 1(2): 146–176.

Arnason J.P. (2015) Ponimaniye mezhtsivilizatsionnogo vzaimodeystviya [Understanding Intercivilizational Encounters]. Metod [Method], 5: 109–123 (in Russian).

Arnason J.P. (2016) Pereosmyslenie vostochnoaziatskogo moderna [East Asian Modernity Revisited]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 1: 191–200 (in Russian).

Arnason J.P. (2017) Revolyutsii, transformatsii, tsivilizatsii: prolegomeny k pereoriyentatsii paradigmy [Revolutions, Transformations, Civilizations: Prolegomena to a Paradigm Reorientation]. Neprikosnovennyy zapas: debaty o politike i kul’ture [Neprikosnovennyy zapas: debate on politics and culture], 5: 37–69 (in Russian).

Bentley J. (1993) Old World Encounters: Cross Cultural Contacts and Exchanges in Pre-Modern Times. New York: Oxford University Press.

Camic C., Joas H. (2004) The Dialogical Turn. In: Camic C., Joas H. (eds.) The Dialogical Turn: New Roles for Sociology in the Postdisciplinary Age. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield: 1–19.

Collins R. (2001) Civilizations as Zones of Prestige and Social Contact. International Sociology, 16(3): 421–437.

Conrad S. (2018) Chto takoye global’naya istoriya? [What is Global History?]. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye (in Russian).

Danilevskiy N.Ya. (1995) Rossiya i Yevropa: Vzglyad na kul’turnyye i politicheskiye otnosheniya Slavyanskogo mira k Germano-Romanskomu [Russia and Europe: A Look at the Cultural and Political Relations of the Slavic World to the Romano-German World]. 6th ed. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo SPbGU; Glagol (in Russian).

Durkheim E., Mauss M. (1971) Note on the Notion of Civilization [1913]. Social Research, 38(4): 808–813.

Eisenstadt S.N. (2000) The Civilizational Dimension in Sociological Analysis. Thesis Eleven, 62(1): 1–21.

Eisenstadt S.N. (2001) The Civilizational Dimension of Modernity: Modernity as a Distinct Civilization. International Sociology, 16(3): 320–340.

Elias N. (1978) What is Sociology? New York: Columbia University Press.

Elias N. (1984) Interview with Peter Ludes on “Knowledge and Power”. In: Meja V., Stehr N. (eds.) Society and Knowledge. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.

Elias N. (2001) O protsesse tsivilizatsii: Sotsiogeneticheskiye i psikhogeneticheskiye issledovaniya. V 2 t. [The Civilizing Process. Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations, 2 vols.]. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga (in Russian).

Espagne M. (2018) Istoriya tsivilizatsiy kak kul’turnyy transfer [History of Civilizations as a Cultural Transfer]. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye (in Russian).

Foucault M. (2005) Nuzhno zashhishhat' obshhestvo: Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1975–1976 uchebnom godu [Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76], St. Petersburg: Nauka (in Russian).

Goudsblom J. (2001) Istoriya chelovechestva i dolgovremennyye sotsial’nyye protsessy: k sintezu khronologii i fazeologii [Human History and Long-Term Social Processes: Towards a Synthesis of Chronology and Phaseology]. In: Rozov N.S. (ed.) Vremya mira. Al’manakh. Vyp. 2: Struktury istorii [The World Time]. Novosibirsk: Sibirskiy khronograf: 117–132 (in Russian).

Goudsblom J. (2006) Civilization: The Career of a Controversial Concept. History and Theory, 45(2): 288–297.

Goudsblom J., Jones E., Mennell S. (1996) The Course the Human History: Economic Growth, Social Process, and Civilization. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

Hall M. Jackson P.T. (eds.) (2007) Civilizational Identity: The Production and Reproduction of ‘Civilizations’ in International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hobson J.H. (2004) The Eastern Origins of Western Civilization. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hodgson M. (1994) Rethinking World History: Essays on Europe, Islam and World History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Huntington S. (2003) Stolknoveniye tsivilizatsiy [The Clash of Civilizations]. Moscow: AST (in Russian).

Katzenstein P.J. (ed.) (2010) Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives. London; New York: Routledge.

Katzenstein P.J. (ed.) (2012) Anglo-America and Its Discontents: Civilizational Identities beyond West and East. London: Routledge.

Knöbl W. (2011) Contingency and Modernity in the Thought of J.P. Arnason. European Journal of Social Theory, 14(1): 9–22.

Kozlovsky V.V. (2000) Figurativnaya sotsiologiya Norberta Eliasa [The Figurative Sociology of Norbert Elias]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 3: 40–59 (in Russian).

Levine D.N. (1995) Visions of the Sociological Tradition. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press.

Mann M. (2018) Istochniki sotsial’noy vlasti [The Sources of Social Power], 4 vols. Moscow: Izdatel’skiy dom «Delo» RANKhiGS (in Russian).

Maslovskiy M.V. (2014) Istoricheskaya sotsiologiya Y. Arnasona: vzglyad na rossiyskuyu istoriyu v kontekste mezhtsivilizatsionnogo vzaimodeystviya. [Johann Arnason’s Historical Sociology: A View at Russian History in the Context of Intercivilizational Encounters]. Metod [Method], 4: 280–289 (in Russian).

Maslovskiy M.V. (2016) Mezhkul’turnoye vzaimodeystviye i sotsial’nyye polya: novyye teoreticheskiye podkhody v yevropeyskoy i amerikanskoy sotsiologii [Interaction of Cultures and Social Fields: New Theoretical Approaches in European and American Sociology]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Research], 7: 11–18 (in Russian).

Maslovskiy M.V. (2018) Relyatsionnaya versiya sovremennogo tsivilizatsionnogo analiza i yeye retseptsiya rossiyskimi sotsiologami [The Relational Version of Contemporary Civilizational Analysis and Its Reception by Russian Sociologists]. Peterburgskaya sotsiologiya segodnya [St. Petersburg Sociology Today], 9: 169–186 (in Russian).

McNeil W. (2004) Voskhozhdeniye Zapada. Istoriya chelovecheskogo soobshchestva [The Rise of the West: A History of the Human Community]. Kiev: Nika-Tsentr; Moscow: Starklayt (in Russian).

Mennell S. (2007) The American Civilizing Process. Cambridge: Polity.

Nelson B. (1981) On the Roads to Modernity: Conscience, Science and Civilizations. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.

Parsons T. (1998) Sistema sovremennykh obshchestv [The System of Modern Societies]. Moscow: Aspekt Press (in Russian).

Smith J. (2017) Debating Civilisations: Interrogating Civilisational Analysis in a Global Age. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Spohn W. (2014) Istoricheskaya i sravnitel’naya sotsiologiya v global’nom mire [Historical and Comparative Sociology in a Globalizing World]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 2: 55–69 (in Russian).

Tiryakian E.A. (1974) Reflections on the Sociology of Civilizations. Sociological Analysis, 35(2): 122–128.

Titarenko L.G. (2016) Kontseptsiya mnozhestvennosti form modernov v istoricheskoy sotsiologii Y.P. Arnasona [The concept of the multiple modernities in J.P. Arnason’s historical sociology]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological research], 1: 186–190 (in Russian).

Wallerstein I. (2003) Konets znakomogo mira: Sotsiologiya XXI veka. [The End of the World as We Know It: Social Science for the Twenty-First Century]. Moscow: Logos (in Russian).

Wittrock B. (2000) Modernity: One, None, or Many? European Origins and Modernity as a Global Condition. Daedalus, 129(1): 31–60.

Wittrock B. (2001) Social Theory and Global History: The Three Cultural Crystallizations. Thesis Eleven, 65(1): 27–50.

Wittrock B. (2002) Sovremennost’: odna, ni odnoy ili mnozhestvo? Yevropeyskiye istoki i sovremennost’ kak vseobshcheye sostoyaniye [Modernity: One, None, or Many? European Origins and Modernity as a Global Condition]. Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 1: 141–159 (in Russian).

Unay S., Senel M. (eds.) (2009) Global Orders and Civilizations: Perspectives from History, Philosophy and International Relations. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

Опубликован
2020-09-11
Как цитировать
Браславский, Р. (2020). Социологические модели современного цивилизационного анализа. ЖУРНАЛ СОЦИОЛОГИИ И СОЦИАЛЬНОЙ АНТРОПОЛОГИИ, 23(5), 7-40. извлечено от http://jourssa.ru/jourssa/article/view/2308