Article Information

THE PRACTICES OF FORMING TRUST IN THE PROCESS OF JOINT LEISURE ACTIVITIES USING THE EXAMPLE OF MOSCOW NIGHT CLUB MUTABOR

Maria Vorobeva (mvorobeva@hse.ru)

National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

Citation: Vorobeva M. (2020) Praktiki formirovaniya doveriya cherez sovmestnyy dosug (na primere moskovskogo nochnogo kluba «Mutabor») [The practices of forming trust in the process of joint leisure activities using the example of Moscow night club Mutabor]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 23(5): 103–134 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2020.23.5.4

Abstract. Contemporary Russia has a low level of trust. Collective leisure can shape trusting behavior. There is a variety of leisure activities, including nightlife — places that work after midnight. Although such places are often associated with deviant behavior, in many European cities nighttime leisure begins to institutionalize. At the same time, nightclubs in the capital of Russia continue to close. Following the wave of attention to nightlife, the paper explores displays of trust in the Moscow nightclub “Mutabor”. The variety of trust generates a discussion about what kind of trust appears during joint leisure. The study works with three types: interpersonal, in-group, and generalized trust, seeking to find which type can appear during joint leisure in a nightclub. Trust seems to be difficult for empirical study. The work uses the method of indirect trust detection, which is proposed to solve problems of trust exploration. On the materials of 14 semi-formalized interviews with visitors of the “Mutabor” club, the practices of trust formation during joint leisure are described. Practices that arise during collective leisure are capable of simultaneously forming multiple types of trust. Practices of direct interaction can shape interpersonal trust between club visitors. Other practices creating a sense of community between visitors are able to form an in-group trust. They solve the problem of collective action within the boundaries of the night club. However, the revealed trust towards strangers is applied only to the audience of the night club and do not go beyond, spreading to the outside world. A generalized trust as trust to all people in general does not appear due to practices of trust forming during joint leisure in a nightclub.

Keywords: interpersonal trust, in-group trust, generalized trust, collective action, indirect trust detection, nightlife, leisure.

References

Begelsdijk S., Maseland R. (2016) Kul'tura v ekonomicheskoy nauke: istoriya, metodologicheskiye rassuzhdeniya i oblasti prakticheskogo primeneniya v sovremennosti [Culture in economics: history, methodological reasoning and areas of practical application in modern times]. Transl. N.M. Avtonomova. St. Petersburg: Gaidar Institute Publishing House; Publishing house “International Relations”; Faculty of Liberal Arts and Sciences, St. Petersburg State University (in Russian).

Baggetta M. (2009) Civic opportunities in associations: Interpersonal interaction, governance experience and institutional relationships. Social Forces, 88(1): 175–199.

Banfield E. (2019) Moral'nyye osnovy otstalogo obshchestva [The Moral Basis of a Backward Society]. Moscow: New publishing house (in Russian).

Bauer P., Freitag M. (2018) Measuring trust. In: The Oxford handbook of social and political trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 15–36.

Bjørnskov C. (2006) Determinants of generalized trust: A cross-country comparison. Public choice, 130(1–2): 1–21.

Coleman J. (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94: S95–S120.

Delhey J., Newton K., Welzel C. (2011) How general is trust in “most people”? Solving the radius of trust problem. American Sociological Review, 76(5): 786–807.

Flyvbjerg B. (2006) Five misunderstandings about case–study research. Qualitative inquiry, 12(2): 219–245.

Freitag M., Bauer P. (2013) Testing for measurement equivalence in surveys: Dimensions of social trust across cultural contexts. Public opinion quarterly, 77(S1): 24–44.

Fukuyama F. (1995) Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free press.

Gelderblom D. (2018) The limits to bridging social capital: Power, social context and the theory of Robert Putnam. The Sociological Review, 66(6): 1309–1324.

Glaeser E., Laibson D., Scheinkman J., Soutter C. (2000) Measuring trust. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3): 811–846.

Glanville J., Shi Q. (2020) The Extension of Particularized Trust to Generalized and Out-Group Trust: The Constraining Role of Collectivism. Social Forces, 98(4): 1801–1828.

Guiso L., Sapienza P., Zingales L. (2006) Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic perspectives, 20(2): 23–48.

Gundelach B. (2014) In diversity we trust: The positive effect of ethnic diversity on outgroup trust. Political Behavior, 36(1): 125–142.

Houser D., Schunk D., Winter J. (2010) Distinguishing trust from risk: An anatomy of the investment game. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 74(1–2): 72–81.

Inglehart R. et al. (1998) Human values and beliefs: A cross-cultural sourcebook. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

Knack S., Keefer P. (1997) Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4): 1251–1288.

Kuchenkova A. (2016) Mezhlichnostnoye doveriye v rossiyskom obshchestve [Interpersonal Trust in Russian Society]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Research], 1: 26–36 (in Russian).

Kumlin S., Rothstein B. (2005) Making and breaking social capital: The impact of welfare–state institutions. Comparative political studies, 38(4): 339–365.

Levitt S., List J. (2007) What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic perspectives, 21(2): 153–174.

Luhmann N. (2012) Theory of Society. Vol. 1. Redwood City, CA.: Stanford University Press.

Luhmann N. (2018) Trust and power. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

MacLean S. (2016) Alcohol and the constitution of friendship for young adults. Sociology, 50(1): 93–108.

Macy M., Skvoretz J. (1998) The evolution of trust and cooperation between strangers: A computational model. American Sociological Review, 63(5): 638–660.

Möllering G. (2001) The nature of trust: From Georg Simmel to a theory of expectation, interpretation and suspension. Sociology, 35(2): 403–420.

Morgner C. (2018) Trust and Society: Suggestions for Further Development of Niklas Luhmann's Theory of Trust. Canadian Review of Sociology, 55(2): 232–256.

Newton K., Stolle D., Zmerli S. (2018) Social and political trust. In: The Oxford handbook of social and political trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 37–56.

Nguyen G., Dejean S., Jullien N. (2018) Do open online projects create social norms? Journal of Institutional Economics, 14(1): 45–70.

Ostrom E. (1996) Incentives, rules of the game, and development. Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics. M. Bruno (ed.). Washington, DC: World Bank, 207–234.

Ostrom E. (2019) Upravlyaya obshchim: evolyutsiya institutov kollektivnoy deyatel'nosti. [Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action]. Moscow: IRISEN, Socium (in Russian).

Patulny R. (2004) Social capital norms, networks and practices: A critical evaluation. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre.

Patulny R., Svendsen G. (2007) Exploring the social capital grid: bonding, bridging, qualitative, quantitative. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27(1–2): 32–51.

Paxton P. (2007) Association memberships and generalized trust: A multilevel model across 31 countries. Social Forces, 86(1): 47–76.

Paxton P., Ressler R. (2018) Trust and participation in associations. In: The Oxford handbook of social and political trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 149–174.

Putnam R, Leonardi R., Nanetti R. (1994) Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Putnam R. (1995) Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political science & politics, 28(4): 664–683.

Putnam R. et al. (2000) Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Schutz A. (2019) O mnozhestvennosti real'nostey [On multiple realities]. Sotsiologicheskoye obozreniye [Sociological Review], 3(2): 3–34 (in Russian).

Seijas A., Gelders M. (2020) Governing the night-time city: The rise of night mayors as a new form of urban governance after dark. Urban Studies (Early Access).

Simmel G. (1910) How is society possible? American Journal of Sociology, 16(3): 372–391.

Simmel G. (1950) The sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press.

Simmel G. (2004) The Philosophy of Money. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.

Simpson B., Willer R. (2015) Beyond altruism: Sociological foundations of cooperation and prosocial behavior. Annual Review of Sociology, 41: 43–63.

Stolle D., Rochon T. (2001) Are all associations alike? Beyond Tocqueville: Civil Society and the Social Capital Debate in Comparative Perspective. Medford; Somerville: Tufts University Press.

Sztompka P. (2003) Trust: A sociological theory. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tabellini G. (2010) Culture and institutions: economic development in the regions of Europe. Journal of the European Economic association, 8(4): 677–716.

Tarabar D. (2019) Does national culture change as countries develop? Evidence from generational cleavages. Journal of Institutional Economics, 15(3): 397–412.

Uslaner E. (2002) The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Uslaner E. (2018) The Study of Trust. The Oxford handbook of social and political trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–14.

Van Hoorn A. (2014) Trust radius versus trust level: Radius of trust as a distinct trust construct. American Sociological Review, 79(6): 1256–1259.

Van Liempt I., Van Aalst I., Schwanen T. (2015) Introduction: Geographies of the urban night. Urban Studies, 52(3): 407–421.

Verba, S., Nie N. H. (1972) Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row.

Vermeulen F., Tillie J., Van de Walle R. (2012) Different effects of ethnic diversity on social capital: Density of foundations and leisure associations in Amsterdam neighborhoods. Urban Studies, 49(2): 337–352.

Voigt S. (2018) How to measure informal institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics, 14(1): 1–22.

Zmerli S., Newton K. (2007) Networking among voluntary associations: Segmented or integrated? Social Capital and Associations in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis, London: Routledge.