Article Information

IN SEARCH OF THE “IZHEVSK MYTH”: THE SYMBOLIC SPACE OF THE CITY AS A RESOURCE FOR THE TERRITORY DEVELOPMENT

Tatiana Vlasovaa (tavlasova@yandex.ru)
Konstantin Obukhovb (fagotfrosch@gmail.com)

aUdmurt State University, Izhevsk, Russia

bUdmurt State University, Izhevsk, Russia

Citation: Vlasova T., Obukhov K. (2021) V poiskakh «izhevskogo mifa»: simvolicheskoye prostranstvo goroda kak resurs razvitiya territoriy [In search of the “Izhevsk myth”: the symbolic space of the city as a resource for the territory development]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 24(4): 196–220 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2021.24.4.8

Abstract. The subject of this article is the symbolic space of Izhevsk as a typical example of the city that went through post-soviet transformation, when the implementation of the environment improvement programs have sparked the discussion about city identity. The research allowed to find out the variety of ideas about the symbols of the city, and to correlate the most common ways of Izhevsk representation among the citizens. The empirical basis of the research are 30 semi-structured interviews with the experts in the city development sphere and the survey among the citizens (n=1001). The experts have described three ways to represent Izhevsk. Except “the city of gunsmiths” there may be the imagery of manufacturing and sports, art, and music. But the variety of city symbols used by experts is not common in social media and among the city residents. According to survey results, they prefer to use conventional symbols, along with the industrial past is prevalent. There is no way to form a well-rounded selection supported by the majority by analyzing the preferences of city residents. Despite the most mentioned symbols (names, images, objects) being identified in the survey, there is no clear logic in the associations, and the city and region identity often contradict each other. Regional brands are mostly based on ethnic characteristics of Udmurtia, that imply rural way of living. Its inclusion in the city space is mostly due to architecture or designer choice, with the dominant role of the industrial symbols.

Keywords: Urban space, Post-soviet city, Izhevsk, Udmurtia, Territory, Urban Symbolism, Urban image, Urban Identity.

Acknowledgements: The research was carried out with the support of the Russian President Foundation “Deryabin assembly: Industrial City Development” (no. 19-2-021122 2019-2020).

References

Beel D.E., Wallace C.D., Webster G., Nguyen H., Tait E., Macleod M., Mellish C. (2017) Cultural resilience: The production of rural community heritage, digital archives and the role of volunteers. Journal of rural Studies, 54: 459–468.

Bogatova O.A., Guseva E.N. (2019) Istoricheskaya pamyat' i etnichnost' v gorodskoj arhitekturnoj srede kak faktor konstruirovaniya social'noj identichnosti naseleniya stolic respublik v sostave Rossijskoj Federacii na primere Izhevska i Saranska [Historical memory and ethnicity in the urban architectural environment as a factor of social identity construction in the capitals of the Russian Federation republics on the example of Izhevsk and Saransk]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Sociologiya, Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Bulletin of Udmurt University. Sociology. Political Science. International Relations], 3(4): 409–429 (in Russian).

Gladarev B. (2013) «Eto nash gorod»: analiz Peterburgskogo dvizheniya za sohranenie istoriko-kul'turnogo naslediya. [“It is our city” analysis of the movement for the cultural and historical heritage in Saint-Petersburg]. In: Clement C. (ed.): Gorodskie dvizheniya Rossii v 2009–2012 gg.: na puti k politicheskomu [Urban Movements in Russia in 2009–2012: on the way of politics]. Moscow: NLO: 23–145 (in Russian).

Grac R. (2008). Gorod v Amerike. Zhiteli i vlasti [City in America. Citizens and Power]. Moscow: Obshchestvo razvitiya rodnoj kul'tury (in Russian).

Grigg S., Howarth D., Feandeiro A. (2020) The logic and limits of “collaborative governance” in Nantes: Myth, ideology, and the politics of new urban regimes. Journal of Urban Affairs, 42(1): 91–108.

Hauge A.L. (2007) Identity and place: a critical comparison of three identity theories. Architectural Science Review, 50(1): 44-51.

Hesmondhalgh D. (2013) Kul'turnye industrii [The cultural industries]. Moscow: HSE Press (in Russian).

Jacobs J. (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage books.

Molotch H. (1976) The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place. American Journal of Sociology, 82(2): 309–332.

Polanska D.V. (2020) Going against institutionalization: New forms of urban activism in Poland. Journal of Urban Affairs, 42(2): 176–187.

Rupasov N.Y. (2009) Mental'nye karty Izhevska: startovye pozicii i perspektivy goroda [Mental maps of Izhevsk: starting positions and future perspectives of the City]. In: Sakharnykh D.M. (ed.) Idnakar: metody istoriko-kul'turnoj rekonstrukcii [Idnakar: methods of historical and cultural reconstruction]. Izhevsk: Unita, 2(6): 29–75 [http://tehne.com/assets/i/upload/library/mentalnye-karty-izhevska.pdf ] (accessed: 04.07.2020) (in Russian).

Semenov A.V. (2019) Korni travy: patterny nizovoj gorodskoj mobilizacii v Rossii [The roots of the grass: patterns of grassroots urban mobilization in Russia]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological research], 12: 29–37 (in Russian).

Tykanova E.V., Khokhlova A.M. (2015) Gorodskoj politicheskij rezhim v Sankt-Peterburge: rol' real'nyh i voobrazhaemyh «mashin rosta» v bor'be za gorodskoe prostranstvo [The urban political regime in St.-Petersburg: the role of real and imagined "growth machines" in the struggle for urban space]. Zhurnal issledovanij social'noj politiki [Journal of Social Policy Studies], 13(3): 241–256 (in Russian).

Vakhshtain V.S. (2014) Peresborka goroda: mezhdu yazykom i prostranstvom. [Reassembly of the city: between language and space]. Sociologiya vlasti [Sociology of Power], 2: 9–38 (in Russian).

Vallbé J.-J., Magre J., Tomàs M. (2018) Being Metropolitan: the effects of individual and contextual factors on shaping metropolitan identity. Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(1): 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12243.

Vickery J. (2009) Vozrozhdenie gorodskih prostranstv posredstvom kul'turnyh proektov — sintez social'noj, kul'turnoj i gorodskoj politiki [Culture-Led Regeneration — Synthesizing Social, Cultural and Urban Policy]. In: Romanov P., Yarskaya-Smirnova E. (eds.) Vizual'naya antropologiya: gorodskie karty pamyati [Visual Anthropology: Urban Mental Maps]. Moscow: Variant; CSPGS: 205–234 (in Russian).

Vlasova T.A., Obukhov K.N. (2020а) Izhevsk 2020: opyt sociologicheskogo issledovaniya simvolicheskogo prostranstva goroda [Izhevsk 2020: experience of sociological research of urban symbolic space]. Izhevsk: Monporazhen (in Russian).

Vlasova T.A., Obukhov K.N. (2020b). Predstavleniya ob etnicheskoj tradicii udmurtov v ramkah sel'skih turisticheskih proektov [Representations about Udmurt ethnic tradition within the frames of rural tourism]. Acta Universitatis Tallinnensis. Humaniora. Sovremennaya udmurtskaya kul'tura. [Acta Universitatis Tallinnensis. Humaniora. Modern Udmurt Culture]. Tallin: Tallin University Press, 1: 369–403 (in Russian).

Winter T. (2013) Clarifying the critical in critical heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 19(6): 532–545.

Zukin S. (1982) Loft Living: Culture and Capital in Urban Change. New Jersey: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Zukin S. (2015) Kul'tury gorodov [The Culture of Cities]. Moscow: NLO (in Russian).