Article Information


Dmitry Tikhaze

Anastassia Kurilova (E-mail:

Independent scholars, Moscow, Russia

Citation: Tikhaze D., Kurilova A. (2018) Naslediye poslerevolyutsionnoy sovetskoy zhiloy arhitektury pervoy poloviny XX veka: opyt sotsiologicheskogo analiza [The legacy of the post-revolutionary Soviet residential architecture of the first half of the XX century: an attempt at sociological analysis]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 21(3): 201–221 (in Russian).

Full Text (PDF)

Abstract. The urbanization in the USSR was going along with the formation of a new type of Soviet people in the context of social changes, for example, the abolition of private property and the mass transition from rural labor to working in factories. Millions of people had to quickly get used to the new types of collective, ideology, household and consumer, social and labor behavior, and also to life in cities. Since cities have become the main place of industrialization and life, and the main element of the new territorial and social structure. Active urbanization consisted not only in the construction of plants, but also in the integrated construction of residential, administrative, service and recreational facilities, and also in changing the appearance of old cities. Architectural objects were built not only with a functional purpose, but also in order to ensure the self-reproduction of the new social system. The paper deals with the sociological study of specific and general social phenomena associated with socialist architectural objects with the help of theoretical concepts of the sociology of architecture (as a part of the sociology of material culture): 1) The material things contain the stabilization aspect of social organization in the mutual influence of people and things. When perceiving the materiality of architecture, social situations that affect people are unfolding. The social context produces architecture that is a specific form of materiality because of the great effort invested and strong fortitude and stability in this social context and its change over time. 2) Architecture makes visible the aspects of social, ideas, social relations and concepts, manifested in the visible aggregate of people and things, social norms and processes that were in the design of architecture, and after the construction — coming with it. With the help of examples of the Soviet architectural avant-garde and, in part, the style following it, an attempt is made to reveal the connection between the materiality and the formation of the Soviet man.

Keywords: sociology, architecture, materiality, Soviet avant-garde, constructivism, revolution


Antonovskiy A.Y. (2004) Poslesloviye perevodchika: Niklas Luhmann: epistemologicheskiye osnovaniya i istochniki sociologicheskogo konstruktivizma [Translator’s afterword: Niklas Luhmann: epistemic basis and the roots of sociological constructivism]. In: Luhmann N. Obshchestvo kak sotsial'naya sistema [Sosiety as a social system]. Moscow: Logos (in Russian).

Bobrinskaya E.A. (2004) Somnitel'naya sushchnost' iskusstva [The ambiguous essence of art]. Khudozhestvennyy zhurnal [Art journal], 54: 9–15 (in Russian).

Bobrinskaya E.A. (2006) Russkiy avangard: granitsy iskusstva [Russian avant-garde: limits of art]. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye (in Russian).

Bobrinskaya E.A. (2010) Russkiy avangard kak istoriko-kul'turnyy fenomen [Russian avant-garde as a historico-cultural phenomenon]. In: Girin Y.N. (ed.) Avangard v kul'ture XX veka (1900–1930). Teoriya. Istoriya. Poetika [Avant-garde in the XX century’s culture (1900–1930). Theory. History. Poetics]. V 2 kn. Kn. 2. M.: IMLI RAN: 5–65 (in Russian).

Buchli V. (1999) An Archaeology of Socialism. Oxford; New York: Berg.

Chepkunova I. (2011) VKhUTEMAS. Mysl’ material’na. Katalog kollektsii studencheskikh rabot iz sobraniya Gosudarstvennogo muzeya im. A.V. Shchuseva [VKhUTEMAS: the thought materialized. Catalogue of VKhUTEMAS student works from the collection of the Shchusev State Museum of Architecture]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennyy muzey arkhitektury im. A.V. Shchuseva (in Russian).

Cooke C. (1995) Russian Avant-Garde: Theories of Art, Architecture and the City. London: Academy Editions.

Durkheim E. (2004) Social structure, material culture and symbolic communication. In: Tanner J. (ed.) The Sociology of art: a reader. London: Routledge: 59–68.

Efroimson V.P. (1995) Genetika etiki i estetiki [Genetics of ethics and esthetics]. St. Petersburg: Talisman (in Russian).

Fowler C., Harris O. (2015) Enduring Relations: Exploring a Paradox of New Materialism. Journal of Material Culture, 20(2): 127–148.

Girin Y.N. (2010) Problema avangarda: soderzhaniye, granitsy, ponyatiynyy apparat [The problem of avant-garde: content, limits, conceptual apparatus]. In: Girin Y.N. (ed.) Avangard v kul’ture XX veka (1900–1930). Teoriya. Istoriya. Poetika [Avant-garde in the XX century’s culture (1900–1930). Theory. History. Poetics]. V 2 kn. Kn. 1. Moscow: IMLI RAN: 34–76 (in Russian).

Hudson H.D., Jr. (1986) “The Social Condenser of Our Epoch”: the Association of Contemporary Architects and the Creation of a New Way of Life in Revolutionary Russia. Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas, 34(4): 557–578.

Izgoyev A.S. (1991) Pyat’ let v Sovetskoy Rossii [Five years in Soviet Russia]. In: Arkhiv russkoy revolyursii [Russian revolution’s archive]. V 22 t. T. 10. Moscow: Terra;, Politizdat: 5–55 (in Russian).

Lodder C. (1983) Russian Constructivism. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.

Lucie-Smith E. (1977) Art Today: From Abstract Expressionism to Superrealism. New York: Morrow.

Luhmann N. (2004) Obshchestvo kak sotsial’naya sistema [Society as a social system]. Moscow: Logos (in Russian).

Meyerovich M.G. (2009) SSSR Kak Megaproyekt [USSR as a Megaproject]. [] (accessed: 08.09.2017) (in Russian).

Meyerovich M.G. (2012) Sotsgorod [Socialistic City]. [] (accessed: 08.09.2017) (in Russian).

Müller A.-L., Reichmann W. (eds.) (2015) Architecture, Materiality and Society: Connecting Sociology of Architecture with Science and Technology Studies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Polyakov Y.A., Zhiromskaya V.B. (2000) Naseleniye Rossii v XX veke [Russia’s population in the XX century]. V 3 t. T. 1. Moscow: ROSSPEN (in Russian).

Pyyhtinen O. (2016) More-than-Human Sociology: A New Sociological Imagination. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Sidorina E.V. (2010) Konstruktivizm [Constructivism]. In: Girin Y.N. (ed.) Avangard v kul’ture XX veka (1900–1930). Teoriya. Istoriya. Poetika [Avant-garde in the XX century’s culture (1900–1930). Theory. History. Poetics]. V 2 kn. Kn. 1. Moscow: IMLI RAN: 530–598 (in Russian).

Simmel G. (1996) Izbrannoye [Selectet works]. V 2 t. T. 2. Moscow: Yurist (in Russian).

Simmel G. (2004) Symmetry and social organization. In: Tanner J. (ed.) The sociology of art: a reader. London: Routledge: 55–58.

Trushchenko O.E. (1995) Prestizh Tsentra: gorodskaya sotsial’naya segregatsiya v Moskve [Prestige of the city centre: urban social segregation in Moscow]. Moscow: Socio-Logos (in Russian).

Vasil’yev N.Y. (2014) Arkhitektura moskovskogo perioda NEPa I Pervoy pyatiletki: putevoditel’ po Moskve [Architecture of NEP and first five-year plan in Moscow: Moscow guide]. Moscow: ABCdesign (in Russian).

Viollet-le-Duc E. (1938) Besedy ob arkhitekture [Discourses on architecture]. Moscow: Izd-vo Vsesoyuznoy akademii arkhitektury (in Russian).

Zalivako A. (2012) Die Bauten des russischen Konstruktivismus, Moskau 1919–32: Baumaterial, Baukonstruktion, Erhaltung [The constructions of Russian Constructivism, Moscow 1919–32: building material, building construction, conservation]. Petersberg: Imhof (in German).