Article Information


Аnna Shatalova a

Elena Tykanova b (E-mail:

aIndependent researcher, St. Petersburg, Russia

bThe Sociological Institute of the RAS — Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SI RAS — FCTAS RAS), St. Petersburg, Russia

Citation: Shatalova A., Tykanova E. (2018) Neformal'nyye praktiki uchastnikov publichnykh slushaniy (sluchay Sankt-Peterburga) [Informal practices of the public hearing participants (the case of Saint Petersburg)]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 21(4): 63–84 (in Russian). 

Abstract. The article is devoted to the study of discursive representations of interest groups’ informal practices during the preparation and conduct of public hearings. The authors analyze the cases of public hearings in St. Petersburg and the range their participants’ opinions. The empirical base of the study consists of a series of semi-structured interviews with citizens, their lobbyists and experts (N = 13), as well as materials of nonparticipant observations at the hearings “On the Amendments to the Law of St. Petersburg” and “On the Master Plan of St. Petersburg”. Theoretical background for the study are the neo-institutional theory of D. North and N. Fligstein, as well as the "ladder of citizen participation" Sh. Arnstein. The authors conclude that the context of interaction between participants during public hearings might take the form of creating the appearance of taking into account the proposals of the public to the cases of real taking into account the opinions of citizens. Meanwhile, at all levels of interaction, advocacy groups, depending on access to power, resort to a specific repertoire of informal practices in order to obtain the desired benefits. Thus, strong advocacy groups can appeal to the invitation of loyal participants and so-called “dummies”; minimization of public hearings information; providing information to the best advantage; shifting responsibility for the decision to external instances and implementing a negligent workflow. While citizens and their lobbyists undertake a survey of tenants for checking the authenticity of attendance, inform the public on the subject of upcoming public hearings; clarify the active public’ membership and agenda. All parties can resort to the spatial tactics, as well as use of force.

Keywords: city, civic participation, public hearings, informal practices, advocacy groups.



Arnstein S.R. (1971) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the Royal Town Planning Institute, 35(4): 216–224.

Burke E.M. (1968) Citizen Participation Strategies. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 3(5): 287–294.

Burton P., Croft J., Goodlad R. (2005) Effectiveness at what? The processes and impact of community involvement in area-based initiatives. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23: 923–938.

Cabannes Y. (2004) Participatory budgeting: a significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environment and urbanization, 16(1): 27–46.

Campbell H., Marshall R. (2000) Public Involvement and Planning: Looking beyond the One to the Many. International Planning Studies, 5(3): 321–344.

Docherty I., Goodlad R., Paddison R. (2001) Civic culture, community and citizen participation in contrasting neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 38(12): 2225–2250.

Duvernoy E.G., Marcus A.A., Overcast T., Schilling A.H. (1982) Public meetings on nuclear waste management: their function and organization. Washington.

Fernie K., McCarthy J. (2001) Partnership and community involvement: Institutional morphing in Dundee. Local economy, 16(4): 299–311.

Fisher F. (2001) Building Bridges Between Citizens and Local Governments to Work More Effectively Together: Through Participatory Planning. UN-Habitat.

Fligstein N. (2001) Polya, vlast' i sotsial'nyye navyki: kriticheskiy analiz novykh institutsional'nykh techeniy [Fields, Power, and Social Skill: A Critical Analysis of The New Institutionalisms]. Экономическая социология [Journal of Economic Sociology], 2(4): 28–55 (in Russian).

Fraser N. (1992) Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press: 56–80.

Goldblatt E. (2005) Alinsky's Reveille: A community-organizing model for neighborhood-based literacy projects. College English, 63(3): 274–295.

Gromyko S.V., Kuryachaya M.M. (2015) Problemy sovershenstvovaniya protsedur obshchestvennykh obsuzhdeniy i publichnykh slushaniy v mekhanizme obshchestvennogo kontrolya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Problems of improving procedures for public discussions and public hearings in the mechanism of public control in the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskiye i pravovyye issledovaniya [Tyumen State University bulletin. Socio-economic and legal research], 3(3): 124–131 (in Russian).

Innes J.E., Booher D.E. (2004) Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4): 419–436.

Khokhlova A.M. (2007) Migrant kak naivnyy etnograf: opyt osvoyeniya novogo kul'turnogo prostranstva goroda [Migrant as a naive ethnographer: mastering the new cultural urban space]. Zhurnal Sotsiologii i Sotsialnoy Antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 1(38): 162–179 (in Russian).

Lyakisheva V.G., Sharapov A.V. (2011) Teoriya i praktika provedeniya publichnykh slushaniy kak odnoy iz form realizatsii instituta neposredstvennoy demokratii (na primere Barnaula) [The theory and practice of holding public hearings as a form of the direct democracy (case of Barnaul)]. Izvestiya AltGU [AltSU bulletin], 4(1): 254–258 (in Russian).

Lydon M., Garcia A.A (2015) Tactical Urbanism How-To. Tactical Urbanism: 171–208.

Martin D.G. (2003). “Place‐framing” as place‐making: constituting a neighborhood for organizing and activism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(3): 730–750.

Mayer M. (2013) First world urban activism. City, 17(1): 5–19.

McComas K., Besley J.C. & Blank L.W. (2010) The ritual of public meetings. Public Administration Review, 70(1): 122–130.

Medvedev I.R. (2016) Problemy osparivaniya publichnykh slushaniy (na primere Moskvy) [The problem of public hearing contestation (case of Moscow)]. Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess [Arbitration and civil procedure], 1: 57–64 (in Russian).

Mould O. (2014) Tactical urbanism: The new vernacular of the creative city. Geography Compass, 8(8): 529–539.

Murray M., Greer J. (2002) Participatory planning as dialogue: the Northern Ireland Regional Strategic Framework and its public examination process. Policy studies, 23(3): 191–209.

North D. (1997) Instituty, institutsional'nyye izmeneniya i funktsionirovaniye ekonomiki [Institutions, institutional change and economic performance]. Moscow: Fond ekonomicheskoy knigi «Nachala».

Reddel T., Woolcock G. (2003) A critical review of citizen engagement strategies in Queensland. Paper presented at the National Institute for Governance conference Facing the Future: Engaging Stakeholders and Citizens in Developing Public Policy. Canberra, Australia: National Institute for Governance, University of Canberra: 127–146.

Rubin H.J., Rubin I., Doig R. (1992) Community organizing and development. New York: Macmillan.

Sergeyeva S.Y. (2009) Publichnyye slushaniya kak forma obshchestvennoy aktivnosti: normativnaya osnova sotsial'noy praktiki [Public hearings as a form of social activity: the normative basis of social practice]. Vestnik TGU [TSU bulletin], 11(79): 388–392 (in Russian).

Shah A. (2007) Participatory budgeting. Washington: The World Bank.

Sherbakova I., Zaripova Z. (2012) Publichnyye slushaniya v gradostroitel'stve: trudnyy put' k soglasovaniyu interesov [Public hearings in town planning: a difficult way of interests matching]. Vlast' [Power], 9: 118–120 (in Russian).

Shilov L.A., Dimke D.V., Grebenshchikova T.Y. (2015) Proyekty partisipatornogo byudzhetirovaniya Komiteta grazhdanskikh initsiativ i Yevropeyskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge [Participatory budgeting projects of the Committee of Civil Initiatives and the European University at St. Petersburg]. Initsiativnoye byudzhetirovaniye v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Materialy Vserossiyskoy konferentsii po initsiativnomu byudzhetirovaniyu [Participatory budgeting in the Russian Federation. Materials of the All-Russian Conference on Participatory Budgeting], 1. Moscow: 197–205 (in Russian).

Sigarev A.V. (2012) Publichnyye slushaniya: tipichnyye problemy munitsipal'no-pravovogo regulirovaniya [Public hearings: typical problems of municipal legal regulation]. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya [Russian Justice], 4: 70–72 (in Russian).

Silva P. (2016) Tactical urbanism: towards an evolutionary cities' approach? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(6): 1040–1051.

Smith R.W. (1973) A theoretical basis for participatory planning. Policy sciences, 4 (3): 275–295.

Starodubov A. (2007) Obshchestvennyye slushaniya v Rossii: realii i problemy [Public hearings in Russia: realities and challenges]. Vlast' [Power], 10: 49–50 (in Russian).

Vagin V.V., Gavrilova N.V., Shapovalova N.A. (2015) Praktiki initsiativnogo byudzhetirovaniya v deyatel'nosti munitsipal'nykh organov vlasti [Practices of participatory budgeting in the activities of municipal authorities]. Vlast' [Power], 12: 42–47 (in Russian).

Vagin V.V., Shapovalova N.A. (2016) Initsiativnoye byudzhetirovaniye i smezhnyye praktiki [Participatory budgeting and related practices]. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya [Financial analytics: problems and solutions], 38: 2–19 (in Russian).

Zaytsev A.V. (2013) Deliberativnaya demokratiya, dialog i ikh mesto v konstellyatsii diskursa publichnoy politiki [Deliberative democracy, dialogue and their place in the constellation of the public policy the discourse]. Nauchnyye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya. Politologiya [Belgorod State University scientific bulletin. Series: History. Political science], 15(158): 147–153 (in Russian).

Zerchaninova Т.Е., Tarbeeva I.S. (2016) Issledovaniye praktiki uchastiya naseleniya munitsipal'nogo obrazovaniya «Gorod Yekaterinburg» v mestnom samoupravlenii [Study of the practice of dwellers participation of the municipal formation “City of Yekaterinburg” in local self-government]. In: Strategii razvitiya sotsial'nykh obshchnostey, institutov i territoriy: Materialy II Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Yekaterinburg, 18–20 aprelya 2016 [Strategies for the development of social communities, institutions and territories: Proceedings of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference. Ekaterinburg, April 18–20, 2016]: Ekaterinburg: Ural University Publishing house, (1): 76–80 (in Russian).