Article Information

WHEN INSULT IS INTERPRETED AS A JOKE? PERSONAL AND SITUATIONAL FACTORS OF CYBERBULLYING BYSTANDER MORAL DISENGAGEMENT

Oxana Mikhailova (oxanamikhailova@gmail.com)

National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

Citation: Mikhailova O. (2019) Kogda oskorbleniye vosprinimayetsa kak shutka? Personalnyye i situativnyye factory otklyucheniya moralnoy otvetstvennosti svidetelya kiberbullinga [When insult is interpreted as a joke? Personal and situational factors of cyberbullying bystander moral disengagement]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 22(2): 55-92 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2019.22.2.3

Full Text (PDF)

Abstract. This article discusses results of experimental study of the factors which are engaged in ascription of the different motivations to the bystanders of cyberbullying. This process could be interpreted as one the possible mechanism which influences the moral disengagement. It was supposed that the process of motives ascription is affected by personal characteristics of the author of the communicative product (message) and psychological peculiarities of the member of the experiment. Personal factors were selected on the basis of behavioral studies of witness of cyberbullying. Situational factors were chosen also on the basis of the previous studies; in addition the author used attributional approach for the explanation of common sense. The hypotheses were tested in the factorial experiment. This experiment took place in the August of 2018 in groups of students on the Russian social network «Vkontakte». The between-subjects experimental design with 12 scenarios was used. 460 students participated. The results of the study show that the higher the level of narcissism of the person the more eager is he / she to attribute cyberbullying to the user of the social network. Participants of the experiment with high levels of machiavellism and psychopathy ascribe the same behavior to the trolling. Age and narcissism of the message author also were significantly connected with the process of motive attribution. The results of this study broaden the knowledge about the behavior of bystanders in the Russian segment of the Internet.

Keywords: cyberbullying, cyberbullying bystander, attributive approach, factorial experiment, moral disengagement.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank my supervisor A.V. Bykov for his advice throughout this project.

References

Abramov R.N., Devyatko I.F., Kozhanov A.A. (2011) Obydennoye znaniye o distributivnoy spravedlivosti: metodicheskoye issledovaniye sravnimosti vnutrisuby’ektnykh i mezhsub’yektnykh eksperimental'nykh planov [Ordinary knowledge of distributive justice: a methodological study of the comparability of between-subject and within-subject experimental designs]. Rossiya Reformiruyushchayasya [Russia Reforming], 10: 22–43 (in Russian).

Ali F., Amorim I.S., Chamorro-Premuzic T. (2009) Empathy deficits and trait emotional intelligence in psychopathy and machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(7): 758–762.

Akulich M.M. (2012) Trolling v sotsial'nykh setyakh: vozniknoveniye i razvitiye [Trolling in social networks: the emergence and development]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo Universiteta Druzhby Narodov Seriya Sotsiologiya [Bulletin of Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Sociology Series], 3: 30–37 (in Russian).

Ang R.P., Goh D.H. (2010) Cyberbullying among adolescents: the role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 41(4): 387–397.

Balakrishnan V. (2018) Actions, emotional reactions and cyberbullying — from the lens of bullies, victims, bully-victims and bystanders among Malaysian young adults. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5): 1190–1200.

Balakrishnan V., Fernandez T. (2018) Self-esteem, empathy and their impacts on cyberbullying among young adults Telematics and Informatics, 35(7): 2028–2037.

Baranov, A.A, Rozhina S.V. (2017) Fizicheskaya kul'tura i sport kak faktory razvitiya stressoustoychivosti i preventsii podrostkovogo kiberbullinga [Physical culture and sport as factors for the development of stress tolerance and prevention of adolescent cyberbulling.]. Teoriya i Praktika Fizicheskoy Kul'tury [Theory and Practice of Physical Culture], 1: 24–25 (in Russian).

Baranov A.A., Rozhina S.V. (2016) Koping-strategii podrostka v situatsii kiberbullinga [Teen coping strategies in a cyberbullying situation.]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo Universiteta. Seriya «Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika» [Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series “Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy”], 26(2): 37–46 (in Russian).

Barlett C., Coyne S.M. (2014) A meta-analysis of sex differences in cyber-bullying behavior: the moderating role of age: sex differences in cyber-bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 40(5): 474–488.

Baughman H.M., Dearing S., Giammarco E., Vernon P.A. (2012) Relationships between bullying behaviours and the Dark Triad: A study with adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(5): 571–575.

Bem D.J. Self-perception theory (1972). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6: 1–62.

Betts L. R., Gkimitzoudis A., Spenser K.A., Baguley T. (2017) Examining the roles young people fulfill in five types of cyber bullying. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(7): 1080–1098.

Bochaver A.A., Khlomov K.D. (2014) Kiberbulling: travlya v prostranstve sovremennykh tekhnologiy [Cyberbullying: persecution in the space of modern technologies]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey Shkoly Ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics], 11(3): 177–191 (in Russian).

Biolcati R., Passini S. (2018) Narcissism and self-esteem: different motivations for selfie posting behaviors. Cogent Psychology, 5(1): 1–12.

Bishop J. (2013) The art of trolling law enforcement: a review and model for implementing ‘flame trolling’ legislation enacted in Great Britain (1981–2012). International Review of Law Computers and Technology, 27(3): 301–318.

Böhm G., Pfister H.-R. (2015) How people explain their own and others’ behavior: a theory of lay causal explanations. Frontiers in Psychology, 6: 1–15.

Brown R.P., Zeigler-Hill V. (2004) Narcissism and the non-equivalence of self-esteem measures: a matter of dominance? Journal of Research in Personality, 38(6): 585–592.

Buckels E.E., Trapnell P.D., Paulhus D.L. (2014) Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67: 97–102.

Buelga S., Martínez–Ferrer B., Cava M. (2017) Differences in family climate and family communication among cyberbullies, cybervictims, and cyber bully-victims in adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 76: 164–173.

Castells M. (2007) Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1(1): 238–266.

Cheng J., Bernstein M., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil C., Leskovec J. (2017) Anyone can become a troll: causes of trolling behavior in online discussions. CSCW Conf Comput Support Coop Work, 1(17): 1217–1230.

Craker N., March E. (2016) The dark side of Facebook: The Dark Tetrad, negative social potency, and trolling behaviours. Personality and Individual Differences, 102: 79–84.

Cuadrado-Gordillo I., Fernández-Antelo I. (2016) Adolescents’ perception of the characterizing dimensions of cyberbullying: differentiation between bullies’ and victims’ perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 55: 653–663.

Devyatko I.F., Gavrilov K. A. (2015) Obydennyye suzhdeniya o prichinnosti i vine za neprednamerennyye negativnyye posledstviya deystviy: eksperimental'nyy podkhod k otsenke vliyaniya [Ordinary judgments about causality and guilt for unintended negative consequences of actions: an experimental approach to assessing influence]. Obydennoye i nauchnoye znaniye ob obshchestve vzaimovliyaniya i rekonfiguratsii [Ordinary and scientific knowledge about the society of mutual influence and reconfiguration]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya: 217–231 (in Russian).

Devyatko I.F. (2011) V storonu spravedlivosti: eksperimental'noye issledovaniye vzaimosvyazi mezhdu deskriptivnym obydennym znaniyem i vospriyatiyem distributivnoy spravedlivosti [Towards Justice: An Experimental Study of the Relationship Between Descriptive Ordinary Knowledge and the Perception of Distributive Justice.]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 2(14): 139–164 (in Russian).

Fan C., Chu X., Zhang M., Zhou Z. (2016) Are narcissists more likely to be involved in cyberbullying? Examining the mediating role of self-esteem. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(15): 1–24.

Fichman P., Sanfilippo M.R. (2016) Online trolling and its perpetrators: under the cyberbridge. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Fichman P., Sanfilippo M.R. (2015) The bad boys and girls of cyberspace: how gender and context impact perception of and reaction to trolling. Social Science Computer Review, 33(2): 163–180.

Fox J., Rooney M.C. (2015) The Dark Triad and trait self-objectification as predictors of men’s use and self-presentation behaviors on social networking sites. Personality and Individual Differences, 76: 161–165.

Gahagan K., Vaterlaus J.M., Frost L.R. (2016) College student cyberbullying on social networking sites: conceptualization, prevalence, and perceived bystander responsibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 55: 1097–1105.

Geel M. Van, Goemans A., Toprak F., Vedder P. (2017) Which personality traits are related to traditional bullying and cyberbullying? A study with the Big Five, Dark Triad and sadism. Personality and Individual Differences, 106: 231–235.

Golf-Papez M., Veer E. (2017) Don’t feed the trolling: rethinking how online trolling is being defined and combated. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(15–16): 1–19.

Golovanova N.A. (2018) Problemy bor'by s bullingom: zakonodatel'noye resheniye [Problems of fighting with bullying: a legislative solution.]. Zhurnal Rossiyskogo Prava [Journal of Russian Law], 8: 113–123 (in Russian).

González-Cabrera J., Calvete E., Leon-Mejia A., Perez-Sancho C., Peinado J.M. (2017) Relationship between cyberbullying roles, cortisol secretion and psychological stress. Computers in Human Behavior, 70: 153–160.

Gumpel T.P., Wiesenthal V., Söderberg P. (2015) Narcissism, perceived social status, and social cognition and their influence on aggression. Behavioral Disorders, 40(2): 138–156.

Halpern D., Valenzuela S., Katz J.E. (2016) “Selfie-ists” or “Narci-selfiers”?: A cross-lagged panel analysis of selfie taking and narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 97: 98–101.

Hardaker C. (2013) “Uh. … not to be nitpicky,,,,,but…the past tense of drag is dragged, not drug.”: An overview of trolling strategies. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 1(1): 58–86.

Hayes B.E. (2018) Bystander intervention to abusive behavior on social networking websites. Violence Women, 25(14): 1–22.

Heider F. (2013) The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Psychology Press.

Ivanova K.A., Stepanov A.A., Nemchinova Ye.V. (2018) Nravstvennost' v seti: pravovaya i nepravovaya otsenka informatsii pri realizatsii pol'zovatelyami prava na svobodu vyrazheniya mneniya [Online morality: legal and non-legal assessment of information when users exercise the right to freedom of expression]. Rossiyskoye Pravo: Obrazovaniye. Praktika. Nauka [Russian Law: Education. Practice. Science], 5(107): 65–70 (in Russian).

Jane E.A. (2015) Flaming? What flaming? The pitfalls and potentials of researching online hostility. Ethics and Information Technology, 17(1): 65–87.

Jones E.E., Davis K.E. (1965) From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception. Advances in experimental social psychology, 2: 219–266.

Kelley H.H. (1967) Attribution theory in social psychology. Nebraska symposium on motivation. Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.

Kholyavin A. O. (2016) Metod fokus-gruppy i rolevaya igra: potentsial i ogranicheniya v issledovanii sotsial'no chuvstvitel'nykh problem [Focus group method and role-playing game: potential and limitations in the study of socially sensitive problems]. Laboratorium [Laboratorium], 8(1): 107–119 (in Russian).

Klempka A., Stimson A. (2014) Anonymous communication on the internet and trolling. Concordia Journal of Communication Research, 1: 1–43.

Kokkinos C.M., Antoniadou N., Markos A. (2014) Cyber-bullying: an investigation of the psychological profile of university student participants. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35(3): 204–214.

Kornilova T.V., Kornilova S.A., Chumakova M.A., Talmach M.S. (2015) Metodika diagnostiki lichnostnykh chert “Temnoy triady”: aprobatsiya oprosnika “Temnaya dyuzhina” [“The Dark Triad” personality trait diagnostic technique: approbation of the “Dark dozen” questionnaire]. Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 2(36): 99–112 (in Russian).

Kozyrkov V.P., Pridatchenko M.V., Kirina O.A. (2018) Raskrytiye potentsiala sotsial'nykh setey kak napravleniye sovremennoy kul'turnoy politiki [Unlocking the potential of social networks as a direction of modern cultural policy]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo Universiteta Im. NI Lobachevskogo. Seriya «Sotsial'nyye Nauki» [Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University. N.I. Lobachevsky. Series “Social Sciences”], 3(51): 66–74 (in Russian).

Kowalski R.M., Giumetti R.M., Schroeder G.W., Lattenner A.N., Micah R. (2014) Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological bulletin, 140(4): 1073–1137.

Krämer N.C., Feurstein M., Kluck J.P., Meier Y., Rother M., Winter S. (2017) Beware of selfies: the impact of photo type on impression formation based on social networking profiles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8: 1–14.

Kyriacou C., Zuin A. (2016) Cyberbullying and moral disengagement: an analysis based on a social pedagogy of pastoral care in schools. Pastoral Care in Education, 34(1): 34–42.

Lampridis E. (2015) Stereotypical beliefs about cyber bullying: an exploratory study in terms of myths. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(2): 135–147.

Locke K.D. (2009) Aggression, narcissism, self-esteem, and the attribution of desirable and humanizing traits to self versus others. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1): 99–102.

Machackova H., Görzig A. (2015) Cyberbullying from a socio-ecological perspective. Media@LSE Working Paper, 36: 1–37.

Milosevic T., Livingstone S. (2018) Protecting children online?: Cyberbullying policies of social media companies. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

March E., Grieve R., Marrington J., Jonason P.K. (2017) Trolling on Tinder® (and other dating apps): examining the role of the Dark Tetrad and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 110: 139–143.

Mishna F., Cook C., Saini M., Wu M.J., MacFadden R. (2011) Interventions to prevent and reduce cyber abuse of youth: a systematic review. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(1): 5–14.

Nesi J., Choukas-Bradley S., Prinstein M.J. (2018) Transformation of adolescent peer relations in the social media context: part 1—a theoretical framework and application to dyadic peer relationships. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 21(3): 267–294.

Orue I., Calvete E. (2016) Psychopathic traits and moral disengagement interact to predict bullying and cyberbullying among adolescents. Journal of interpersonal violence, 11: 1–20.

Pabian S. (2015) A developmental perspective on personal and situational predictors and outcomes of adolescent cyberbullying perpetration: A longitudinal examination. Antwerpen: Universiteit Antwerpen.

Pabian S., De Backer C.J.S., Vandebosch H. (2015) Dark Triad personality traits and adolescent cyber-aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 75: 41–46.

Peterson J., Densley J. (2017) Cyber violence: what do we know and where do we go from here?. Aggression and violent behavior, 34: 193–200.

Pieschl S., Kourteva P., Stauf L. (2017) Challenges in the evaluation of cyberbullying prevention–insights from two case studies. International Journal of Developmental Science, 11(1–2): 45–54.

Pogontseva D.V. (2019) Bulling svyazannyy s vneshnim oblikom [Bulling associated with the appearance]. Azimut nauchnykh issledovaniy: pedagogika i psikhologiya [The azimuth of scientific research: pedagogy and psychology], 1(26): 359–361 (in Russian).

Rodionova M.N. (2018) Sotsiokul'turnyye faktory kiberbullinga v khudozhestvennoy refleksii sovremennogo zarubezhnogo kinematografa [Socio-cultural factors of cyberbulling in the artistic reflection of modern foreign cinema]. Gumanitarnyye Vedomosti TGPU Im. LN Tolstogo [Humanitarian Gazette TSPU LN Tolstoy], 3–2(27): 142–156 (in Russian).

Savage M.W., Tokunaga R.S. (2017) Moving toward a theory: testing an integrated model of cyberbullying perpetration, aggression, social skills, and internet self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 71: 353–361.

Schachter S. (1964) The interaction of cognitive and physiological determinants of emotional state. Advances in experimental social psychology, 1: 49–80.

Sest N., March E. (2017) Constructing the cyber-troll: psychopathy, sadism, and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 119: 69–72.

Smith R.C. (2013) Discovery and compulsion: how regulatory and litigation issues relating to intellectual property rights are challenging the fundamental right to the protection of personal data. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 3 (1): 2–21.

Soldatova G.U., Chigarkova S., Lvova Ye.N. (2017) Onlayn-agressiya i podrostki: rezul'taty issledovaniya shkol'nikov Moskvy i Moskovskoy oblasti. [Online aggression and adolescents: research results of schoolchildren in Moscow and the Moscow region]. Epokha Nauki [The Age of Science], 12: 103–109 (in Russian).

Solomontos-Kountouri O., Konstantionos T., Petra G., Dagmar S. (2017) Academic, socio-emotional and demographic characteristics of adolescents involved in traditional bullying, cyberbullying, or both: looking at variables and persons. International Journal of Developmental Science, 11(1–2): 19–30.

Steffgen G., König A., Pfetsch J., Melzer A. (2011) Are cyberbullies less empathic? Adolescents’ cyberbullying behavior and empathic responsiveness. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(11): 643–648.

Taylor S.H., Hinck A.S., Lim H. (2017) An experimental test of how selfies change social judgments on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(10): 610–614.

Valkenburg, Patti M., Jochen P., Walther J. B. (2016) Media effects: theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1): 315–338.

Vasil'yev T. (2016) Negativnyye aspekty virtual'noy kommunikatsii i ikh pastyrskaya otsenka [Negative aspects of virtual communication and their pastoral assessment]. Khristianskoye Chteniye [Christian Reading], 6: 311–329 (in Russian).

Wang C., Ryoo J. H., Swearer S. M., Turner R., Goldberg T. S. (2017) Longitudinal relationships between bullying and moral disengagement among adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(6): 1304–1317.

Wegener D.T., Petty R.E. (1998) The naive scientist revisited: naive theories and social judgment. Social Cognition, 16(1): 1–7.

Wegge D., Vandebosch H., Eggermont S., Pabian S. (2016) Popularity through online harm: the longitudinal associations between cyberbullying and sociometric status in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 36(1): 86–107.

Weiner B. (1985) An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological review, 92(4): 548.

Weiser E.B. (2015) #Me: Narcissism and its facets as predictors of selfie-posting frequency. Personality and Individual Differences, 86: 477–481.

You S., Lee Y., Kim E. (2016) Physical, social, and cyberbullying: relationships with adolescents’ psychosocial factors. Child Indicators Research, 9(3): 805–823.

Zhou Y., Zheng W., Gao X. (2018) The relationship between the big five and cyberbullying among college students: the mediating effect of moral disengagement. Current Psychology, 37(1): 1–12.

Zintsova A.S. (2014) Sotsial'naya profilaktika kiberbullinga [Social prevention of cyberbullying]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo Universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya «Sotsial'nyye Nauki» [Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University. N.I. Lobachevsky. Series “Social Sciences”], 3(35): 122–128 (in Russian).