Article Information

CAREER EXPECTATIONS AND PLANS OF THE YOUNG SPECIALISTS IN THE LABOR MARKET

Aleksandra Levitskayaa (alexandra_levitskaya@mail.ru), Nadezhda Pokrovskaiab (nnp@herzen.spb.ru, nnp@spbstu.ru)

aSaint Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russia

bHerzen State Pedagogical University of Russia;
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University;
Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI”, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Citation: Levitskaya A.N., Pokrovskaia N.N. (2021) Kar'yernyye ozhidaniya i plany molodykh spetsialistov na rynke truda [Сareer expectations and plans of the young specialists in the labor market]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 24(1): 105-137 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2021.24.1.5

Abstract. The labor market in Russia is undergoing a number of major changes. First of all, these changes are associated with the high rates of digitalization, penetrating into all spheres of public life, but the impact of the deepening economic crisis should also be noted. Against this background, it should be remembered that the transition to the knowledge economy in itself creates a need for a qualitative improvement of the human resource, both through retraining and increasing the level of knowledge of existing employees, and through the influx of young specialists. Young people building their own professional path is the work of both young people themselves and the structures for training specialists at all levels, including in the higher education system. Career planning is one of the key stages in building a professional future for representatives of the younger generation. Due to the fact that specialists who are usually referred to as generation Z or digital generation enter the labor market, the question of how to learn to understand new players in the labor market in order to effectively use them is an acute question for business leaders, HR specialists and scientists. To this end the authors of this study examine the level of awareness among the younger generation of the skill sets necessary for professional and career growth. This article also examines the ideological attitudes and career expectations of young professionals and the possibility of correlating these expectations with the representation of the employers and managers about human capital. Considering the representatives of the younger generation as a new resource, the authors of this article also raise the issue of intergenerational interaction, meaning the search for the most effective form of interaction between the generation of employers (generation X and Y) and the generation of young professionals (generation Z).

Keywords: labor market, economic crisis, flexible capitalism, precariat, intergenerational interaction, professional growth, career growth, professional skills.

References

Asanov I.A., Pokrovskaia N.N. (2017) Digital regulatory tools for entrepreneurial and creative behavior in the knowledge economy. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference “Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies”, IT and QM and IS 2017. IEEE Explore: 43–46.

Avakova E.B., Pokrovskaia N.N., Kuznetsov A.A. (2019) Sotsiologicheskiy analiz obra-zovaniya kak sistemy formirovaniya intellektual'nogo kapitala v informatsionnom ob-shchestve [Sociological analysis of education as a system for the formation of intellectual capital in an information society]. Izvestiya SPbGEU [Izvestia SPbGEU], 2: 123–130 (in Russian).

Bendix R. (1980) Kings or people: power and the mandate to rule. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Biryukov A. A. (2015) Poyavleniye prekariata ili vozvrashcheniye proletariata? (O knige Gaya Stendinga «Prekariat — novyy opasnyy klass») [The emergence of the precariat or the return of the proletariat? (About Guy Standing's book "Precariat — a new dangerous class")]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological research], 10: 158–162 (in Russian).

Boltanski L., Chiapello E. (2005) The New Spirit of Capitalism. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 18(3–4): 161–188.

Cardullo P., Kitchin R. (2018) Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: The neoliberal logic of «citizen-focused» smart cities in Europe. New York: SocArXiv papers.

Chen C.V., Kao R.H. (2012) Work Values and Service-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: The Mediation of Psychological Contract and Professional Commitment: A Case of Students in Taiwan Police College. Social Indicators Research, 107(1): 149–169.

Chomsky N. (2002) Pribyl' na lyudyakh [Profit on people]. Moscow: Praxis (in Russian).

Efendiev A.G., Gogoleva A.S., Pashkevich A.V., Balabanova E.S. (2020) Tsennostno-motivatsionnyye osnovy i real'nost' trudovoy zhizni rossiyskikh rabotnikov: problemy i protivorechiya [Value-motivational foundations and the reality of the working life of Russian workers: problems and contradictions]. Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia], 2: 108–133 (in Russian).

Florida R. (2007) Kreativnyy klass: lyudi, kotoryye menyayut budushcheye [Creative class: people who change the future]. Moscow: Classic XXI (in Russian).

Florida R. (2016) Kreativnyy klass: Lyudi, kotoryye sozdayut budushcheye [Creative class: People who create the future]. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber (in Russian).

Gelikh O.Ya., Levitskaya A.N., Pokrovskaia N.N. (2020) Sotsiologicheskiy analiz sotsial'nykh ustanovok professional'nogo i kar'yernogo rosta v kontekste tsifrovoy ekonomiki i obshchestva znaniy [Sociological analysis of social attitudes of professional and career growth in the context of the digital economy and knowledge society]. Sotsiologiya i pravo [Sociology and Law], 3: 6–18 (in Russian).

Golenkova Z.T, Goliusova Yu.V. (2015) Prekariat kak novoye yavleniye v sovremennoy sotsial'noy structure [Precaria as a new phenomenon in the modern social structure]. In: Golenkova Z.T. (ed.) Nayemnyy rabotnik v sovremennoy Rossii [Hired worker in modern Russia]: 121–138 (in Russian).

Gubareva L.I., Baranova S.V., Biryukova N.P. (2017) Professional'nyye navyki i professional'nyye umeniya v sisteme podgotovki kadrov SPO: osnovnyye podkhody i opredeleniya [Professional skills and professional skills in the system of vocational education personnel training: basic approaches and definitions]. Uchenyye zapiski Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta: gumanitarnyye i sotsial'nyye nauki [Scientific notes of Oryol State University: humanities and social sciences], 74(1): 145–148 (in Russian).

Handy Ch. (2001) Vremya bezrassudstva. Iskusstvo upravleniya v organizatsii budushchego [A time of recklessness. The art of management in organizing the future]. St. Petersburg: Peter (in Russian).

Hauff S., Kirchner S. (2014) Changes in Workplace Situation and Work Values. Relations and Dynamics within Different Employment Regimes. Management Revue, 25(1): 27–49.

Healy K. (2002) What’s New for Culture in the New Economy? Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 32: 86–103.

Hirschi A., Fischer S. (2013) Work Values as Predictors of Entrepreneurial Career Intentions. Career Development International, 18(3): 216–231.

Howe N., Strauss W. (2008) Millennials & K–12 Schools. LifeCourse Associates: 109–111.

Klyuchnikova T.N., Davydova O.V. (2020) Trudovoy potentsial studenchestva kak sotsial'naya baza ekonomicheskikh peremen [Labor potential of students as a social base of economic changes]. Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii [Bulletin of Economics, Law and Sociology], 1: 121–125 (in Russian).

Konobevtsev F., Laas N., Gurova E., Romanova I. (2019) Udalennaya rabota: tekhnologiya i opyt organizatsii [Remote work: technology and experience of the organization]. Vestnik universiteta [University Bulletin], 7: 9–17 (in Russian).

Luzgina E.N. (2019) Osobennosti trudovogo povedeniya molodezhi g. Sankt-Peterburga (po rezul'tatam anketnogo oprosa) [Features of labor behavior of young people in St. Petersburg (based on the results of a questionnaire survey)]. Peterburgskaya sotsiologiya segodnya [St. Petersburg sociology today], 12: 75–92 (in Russian).

Nesterenko Yu.N., Protasova E.A. (2019) Samozanyatost' v Rossii: sostoyaniye i potentsial razvitiya [Self-employment in Russia: state and development potential]. Narodonaseleniye [Population], 4: 78–89 (in Russian).

Paret M. (2015) Precarious Labor Politics: Unions and the Struggles of the Insecure Working Class in the United States and South Africa. Critical Sociology, 41(4–5): 757–784.

Pokrovskaia N.N. (2008) Normativnaya i tsennostnaya regulyatsiya ekonomicheskogo povedeniya rossiyskikh rabotnikov [Normative and value regulation of the economic behavior of Russian workers]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noy antropologii [Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 11(3): 100–110 (in Russian).

Radaev V.V., Shkaratan O.I. (1996) Sotsial'naya stratifikatsiya [Social stratification]. Moscow: Aspect Press (in Russian).

Salitsky A. I. (2008) Novyy lider mirovoy ekonomiki [New leader of the world economy]. Vestnik RAN [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 3: 264–270 (in Russian).

Savage M., Devin F., Cunningham N., Taylor M., Li Y., Hjellbrekke J., Le Roux B., Friedman S., Miles A. (2013) A New Model of Social Class? Findings from the BBC’s Great British Class Survey Experiment. Sociology, 47(2): 219–250.

Seymour R. (2016) We Are All Precarious — On the Concept of the “Precariat” and Its Misuses. Newleftproject [http://www.newleftproject.org/index.php/site/article_comments/we_are_all... ] (accessed: 26.01.2021).

Shkaratan O.I., Karacharovsky V.V., Gasyukova E.N. (2015) Prekariat: teoriya i empiricheskiy analiz (na materialakh oprosov v Rossii, 1994–2013) [Precarious: theory and empirical analysis (based on surveys in Russia, 1994–2013)]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological research], 12: 99–110 (in Russian).

Slobodskaya A.V. (2016) Mesto prekariata v sotsial'noy strukture sovremennogo obshchestva: kriticheskiy analiz diskussii po povodu kontseptsii G. Stendinga [The place of the precariat in the social structure of modern society: a critical analysis of the discussion about the concept of G. Standing]. Istoricheskiye, filosofskiye, politicheskiye i yuridicheskiye nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedeniye. voprosy teorii i praktiki [Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. questions of theory and practice], 66(4–1): 162–165 (in Russian).

Snyder B.H. (2016) The Disrupted Workplace: Time and the Moral Order of Flexible Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sorokin P.A. (1992) Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo [Man. Civilization. Society]. Moscow: Politizdat (in Russian).

Sorokin P.S. (2013) Sovremennyye issledovaniya kar'yery kak sotsial'nogo yavleniya: teoretiko-metodologicheskiye problemy i puti ikh preodoleniya [Modern research of career as a social phenomenon: theoretical and methodological problems and ways to overcome them]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya [Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Sociology], 3: 40–50 (in Russian).

Standing G. (2014) A Precariat Charter, From Denizens to Citizens. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Standing G. (2014) Prekariat: novyy opasnyy klass [Precariat: A New Dangerous Class]. Moscow: Ad Marginem (in Russian).

Strauss B., Strauss W., Howe N. (1991) Generations: The History of America's Future, 1584 to 2069. Morrow.

Temnova L.V., Malakhov F.V., E.S. Voskanyan E.S. (2016) Kontseptual'nyye podkhody k issledovaniyu kar'yery [Conceptual approaches to career research]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii [Higher education in Russia], 201(5): 64–71 (in Russian).

Yakimova E.V., Ponamareva A.M. (2019) Neoliberalizm i homo neoliberalus pod pritselom sotsiologicheskoy i psikhologi-cheskoy kritiki: vvedeniye k tematicheskomu razdelu [Neoliberalism and homo neoliberalus under the sight of sociological and psychological criticism: an introduction to the thematic section]. Sotsial'nyye i gumanitarnyye nauki. otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Seriya 11: sotsiologiya [Social and Human Sciences. domestic and foreign literature. Series 11: Sociology], 2: 6–23 (in Russian).

Zakharova N.L., Tsarkova L.V. (2019) Professional'nyye tsennosti sub"yektov deyatel'nosti: analiz rezul'tatov kross kul'turnogo issledovaniya [Professional values of subjects of activity: analysis of the results of cross-cultural research]. Nauchnyy zhurnal [Scientific journal], 43(9): 58–64 (in Russian).