Article Information

MODELS OF LEGITIMATION OF NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS AS SOCIAL SERVICE PROVIDERS

Elena Iarskaia-Smirnova a (elena.iarskaia@gmail.com), Olga Bodrova b

a International Laboratory for Social Integration Research, HSE University, Moscow Russia

b HSE University, Moscow Russia

Citation: Iarskaia-Smirnova E., Bodrova O. (2021) Modeli legitimatsii nekommercheskikh organizatsiy kak postavshchikov sotsial'nykh uslug [Models of legitimation of non-profit organizations as social service providers]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 24(1): 45–78 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2021.24.1.3

Abstract. The article presents a reflection of various approaches to explaining the legitimacy of socially oriented non-profit organizations (SONPOs): market orientation, social capital, institutional logic, emotional commitment, traditionalist attitudes, critical model. The analysis is based on theoretical sources, published results of relevant empirical studies, evidence from the Internet resources of non-profit organizations and mass media. SONPO legitimation models include normative justifications of the existing policies and practices in relation to such organizations. Following the rules of a market economy, SONPOs function, on the one hand, as autonomous entities, and on the other, as complementary to and controlled by the state institutions. The reforming social service systems in the regions are characterized by varying degrees of involvement of non-profit providers. Thus, the consideration of questions of legitimacy in specific institutional contexts is required. It is shown that although the market affiliation of SONPOs partly increases their readiness for the challenges of the external environment, the low level of public and institutional trust makes them vulnerable in front of the more powerful and resource-provided competitors. The uneven growth of trust in various forms of public associations is determined at the macro level by reforms in the social sphere, while different subjects of partnership in the social sphere have different arguments for legitimizing the non-profit providers. Legitimation is becoming an individual and collective upward mobility project for the non-profit social service providers. In the process of legitimization, the non-profit providers of social services are assigned with characteristics defined by the legislation, indicators of ratings and assessments, discussed in the communities of NPOs and mass media. Organizations strive to meet the requirements and public expectations in terms of market efficiency, embeddedness in a local context, affective and value congruence with donors and target groups, partnerships with government agencies. At the same time, SONPOs are expected to be flexible enough in order to maneuver between the expectations of different stakeholders and weave different logics into their organizational identity.

Keywords: legitimacy, socially oriented non-profit organizations, social service providers.

Acknowledgements

This work/article is an output of a research project implemented as part of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University). The authors express their gratitude to the anonymous reviewer and the editors of the journal for their valuable comments and recommendations.

References

Ashforth B.E., Gibbs B.W. (1990) The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2): 177–194.

Baranov I.N. (2012) Novyj gosudarstvennyj menedzhment: evolyuciya teorii i praktiki primeneniya [New public management: evolution of theory and practices of applying]. Rossijskij zhurnal menedzhmenta [Russian journal of management], 10(1): 51–64 (in Russian).

Bauman Z. (2003) Zakonodateli i tolkovateli: Kul'tura kak ideologiya intellektualov [Legislators and interpreters: Culture as intellectuals’ ideology]. Neprikosnovennyj zapas [Inviolable arsenal], 1(27): 5–20.

Benevolenskiy V.B., Shmulevich E.O. (2013) Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka social'no orientirovannyh NKO v svete zarubezhnogo opyta [Foreign experience of governmental support for socially orientated NGOs]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal'nogo upravleniya [Issues of state and municipal manahement], 3: 150–171.

Berger P., Luckman T. (1995) Social'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sociologii znaniya [Social constructing of reality. Tractate on sociology of knowledge]. Moscow: Medium (in Russian).

Bogdanova E., Cook L.J., Kulmala M. (2018) The Carrot or the Stick? Constraints and Opportunities of Russia's CSO Policy. Europe-Asia Studies, 70(4): 501–513.

Chirikova A.E. (2011) Social'naya politika v sovremennoj Rossii: sub"ekty i regional'nye praktiki [Social policy of modern Russia: subjects and regional practices]. Moscow: Institut sociologii RAN (in Russian).

Dellmuth L.M., Tallberg J. (2015) The Social Legitimacy of International Organizations: Interest Representation, Institutional Performance, and Confidence Extrapolation in the United Nations. Review of International Studies, 41(3): 451–475

Di Lauro S., Tursunbayeva A., Antonelli G. (2019) How Nonprofit Organizations Use Social Media for Fundraising: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Business and Management, 14(7):1–22

Dimaggio P.J., Powell W.W. (1991) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In: Powell W.W., Dimaggio P.J. (eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. London: The University of Chicago Press: 147–160

Dimenshtejn R.P. (2008) Iz pravozashchitnoj deyatel'nosti RBOO CLP: pobeda v Verhovnom Sude — otmena «varvarskogo» Prikaza Minzdravsocrazvitiya» [From human rights activity of Center for curative pedagogics: victory in the Supreme Court — cancel of “barbarian” order of the Ministry of social development and healthcare]. Tez. dokl. na kruglom stole «Sem'ya i rebenok-invalid» [Family and child with disability]. Moscow: Press-centr Gosudarstvennogo Kremlevskogo Dvorca (in Russian).

Dubrovskaya T.V. (2016) Metodologicheskie voprosy issledovaniia oppozitsii v politicheskom diskurse (na primere “sila vs. slabost’) [Metodological voprosy of the study of the oppositions in political discourse (on an example of opposition ‘power vs. weakness’)]. Nauchnyi dialog [Scholarly dialogue], 7(55): 23–44.

Fröhlich Ch. (2012) Civil society and the state intertwined: The case of disability NGOs in Russia. East European Politics, 28(4): 371–389.

Fröhlich Ch., Skokova Y. (2020) Two for One: Public Welfare and Regime Legitimacy through State Funding for CSOs in Russia. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(4): 698–709.

Greshnova E. (2010) Rezul'taty i effekty deyatel'nosti NKO — pomogayut li oni zavoevat' doverie obshchestva? In: Povyshenie doveriya k nekommercheskim organizaciyam: rossijskij kontekst [Results and effects of NGOs activity — do they help to obtain social trust?]. Moscow: Agentstvo social'noj informacii, 2010: 38–44 (in Russian).

Grigoryev S.I., Kataeva V.I., Fomicheva T.V. (2018) Innovacionnye praktiki social'no orientirovannyh nekommercheskih organizacij (SONKO) po delam sem'i i detej v Rossii [Innovation practices of socially orientated noncommercial organizations (SONGOs) on family and children issues in Russia]. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living standards of Russian regions], 1: 54–59 (in Russian).

Grishina E., Tsatsura E. (2020) Problemy razvitiya nekommercheskogo sektora social'nogo obsluzhivaniya pozhilyh [Developmental problems of noncommercial sector in social services for eldely people]. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsialnoy politiki [The journal of social policy studies], 18(3): 395–410 (in Russian).

Herlin H. (2015) Better Safe than Sorry: Nonprofit Organizational Legitimacy and Cross-Sector Partnerships. Business & Society, 54(4): 822–858.

Kholavin A. (2020) «Pirozhki dlya babushki»: kriticheskij vzglyad na proektnoe myshlenie NKO [“Buns for grandmather”: critical view on project thinking of NGOs]. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsialnoy politiki [The journal of social politic studies], 18(3): 461–474 (in Russian).

Komitet grazhdanskih iniciativ (2013) Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo — resurs razvitiya Rossii. Informacionno-analiticheskie materialy o deyatel'nosti negosudarstvennyh nekommercheskih organizacij «Negosudarstvennye nekommercheskie organizacii v Sankt-Peterburge» [Civil society — results of Russia development. Infromational and analytical materials on nongovernmental noncommercial organizations “Nongovernmental noncommercial organizations in Saint-Petersburg”]. St. Petersburg: Centr razvitiya nekommercheskih organizacij (in Russian).

Korneeva I.E., Ojner O.K. (2018) Orientaciya na rynok i rezul'tativnost' deyatel'nosti rossijskih nekommercheskih organizacij [Market orientation and productivity of Russian noncommercial organizations]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Menedzhment [Herald of Saint-Petersburg State University. Management], 17(4): 437–464 (in Russian).

Kravchenko Zh., Moskvina A. (2018) Entrepreneurial NPOs in Russia: Rationalizing the Mission. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(5): 962–975.

Krysik A. (2018) Crowdfunding and Non-Profit Charities: Crafting Legitimate Profiles. Master's Theses. Marquette University [https://epublications.marquette.edu/theses_open/504 ] (accessed 16.10.2020)

Kupryashin G.L. (2016) Publichnoe upravlenie [Public management]. Politicheskaya nauka [Political science], 2: 101–131 (in Russian).

Lister S. (2003) NGO Legitimacy: Technical Issue or Social Construct? Critique of Anthropology, 23(2): 175–192.

Luhmann N. (2001) Vlast' [Power]. Moscow: Praksis (in Russian).

Martynov M.Yu. (2019) Social'no orientirovannye nekommercheskie predpriyatiya — obretenie legitimnosti? [Socially orientated noncommercial ventures — obtaining of legitimacy?] Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological studies], 10: 83–93 (in Russian).

Mersiyanova I. V., Kononykhina O., Sokolowski W., Salamon L.M. (2017) Russia: A Classic Statist Model. In: Salamon L.M., Sokolowski S.W., Haddock M.A. (eds.) Explaining Civil Society Development: A Social Origins Approach. Johns Hopkins University Press. Ch. 14: 223–236.

Mersiyanova I.V., Benevolenskiy V.B (2016) Preimushchestva NKO kak postavshchikov social'nyh uslug: aprobaciya v rossijskih usloviyah [NGO advantages as social services providers: approbation in Russian conditions]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal'nogo upravleniya [Issues of state and municipal management], 4: 7–26 (in Russian).

Mersiyanova I.V., Benevolenskiy V.B. (2017) NKO kak postavshchiki social'nyh uslug: verifikaciya slabyh storon [NGO as social services providers: verification of weak sides]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal'nogo upravleniya [Issues of state and municipal management], 2: 83–104 (in Russian).

Meyer J.W., Rowan B. (1977) Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology. 83(2): 340–363.

Mills Ch.W. (2001) Sociologicheskoe voobrazhenie [Sociological imagination]. Moscow: NOTA BENE (in Russian).

Moskovskaya A.A., Berendyaev A.A., Moskvina A.Yu. (2017) Mezhdu social'nym i ekonomicheskim blagom: konflikt proektov legitimacii social'nogo predprinimatel'stva v Rossii [Between social and economical benefits: conflict of legitimacy of social entrepreneurship projects in Russia]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya [Public opinion monitoring], 6: 31–51 (in Russian).

Moskvina A. (2020) Uchastie nekommercheskih organizacij v social'nom predprinimatel'stve: vliyanie akseleracionnoj deyatel'nosti (na primere akseleratora CRNO 2015–2017 gg.) [Noncommercial organizations participation in social entrepreneurship: acceleration activity influence (on the example of accelerator of the NGO development center 2015–2017)]. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsialnoy politiki [The Journal of social policy studies], 18(3): 379–394 (in Russian).

Myers M. (2007) The Use of Pathos in Charity Letters: Some Notes toward a Theory and Analysis. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 37(1): 3–16.

Popova I. (2000) Sociologicheskij podhod k issledovaniyu legitimnosti i legitimacii. K postanovke problem [Sociological approach to legitimacy and legitimating studies. Determination of the problems]. Sotsiologiya: teoriya, metody, marketing [Sociology: theory, methods, marketing], 3: 21–41 (in Russian).

Putnam P. (1996) Chtoby demokratiya srabotala. Grazhdanskie tradicii v sovremennoj Italii [Democracy to bring results. Civil traditions in modern Italy]. Moscow: Ad Marginem (in Russian).

Rudnik B.L., Kushtanina E.V. (2018) Privlechenie NKO k okazaniyu social'nyh uslug: prozrachnost' primenyaemyh procedur [Involving NGOs to social services providing: transparency of the procedures applied]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal'nogo upravleniya [Issues of state and municipal management], 3: 117–137 (in Russian).

Rudnik B.L., Kushtanina E.V., Romanova V.V. (2017) Privlechenie NKO k okazaniyu uslug social'noj sfery [Involving NGOs to providing services in social sphere]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal'nogo upravleniya [Issues of state and municipal management], 2: 105–129 (in Russian).

Salamon L.M., Sokolowski S.W., Haddock M.A. (2017). Explaining civil society development: A social origins approach. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Salamon L.M., Skokova Yu., Krasnopolskaya I. (2020) Subnational Variations in Civil Society Development: The Surprising Case of Russia. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(5): 1058–1081

Sätre A-M., Varyzgina A., Granberg L. (2020) The adaptation of local civic organisations in Russia to change: a case study of NGOs with a focus on social problems. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsialnoy politiki [The Journal of Social Policy Studies], 18(3): 509–522 (in Russian).

Scott W.R. (2010) Reflections: The Past and Future of Research on Institutions and Institutional Change. Journal of Change Management, 10(1): 5–21.

Scott W.R. 2001) Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage: 2001.

Soldatkin A., Blackburn M. (2020) Institutional changes in state authorities collaborating with NGOs. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsialnoy politiki [The Journal of Social Policy Studies], 18(3): 523–538 (in Russian).

Starshinova A., Borodkina O. (2020) Deyatel'nost' NKO v sfere social'nyh uslug: obshchestvennye ozhidaniya i regional'nye praktiki [NGOs activity in the sphere of social services: community expectations and regional practices]. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsialnoy politiki [The Journal of social policy studies], 18(3):411–428 (in Russian).

Suchman M.C. (1995) Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 571–610.

Sungurov A.Yu. (2009) Modeli vzaimodejstviya organov gosudarstvennoj vlasti i struktur grazhdanskogo obshchestva: rossijskij opyt [Model of interaction of state authorities and civil society: Russian experience]. In: Yasin E.G. (ed.) Modernizaciya ekonomiki i globalizaciya [Modernization of economy and globalization]. V 3 kn. Kn. 1. Moscow: Izdatel'skij dom GU-VSHE: 500–508 (in Russian).

Tarasenko A.V. (2013) Nekommercheskij sektor na rynke social'nyh uslug: k chemu vedut polumery liberalizacii social'noj sfery v Rossii (opyt Sankt-Peterburga) [Noncommercial sector on the social services market: what do the half measures of liberalization of social sphere lead to]. NIU VSHE [NRU HSE] [https://publications.hse.ru/preprints/98524194 ] (accessed: 04.10.2020) (in Russian).

Thrandardottir E. (2015) NGO Legitimacy: Four Models. Representation, 51(1): 107–123.

Toepler S., Pape U., Benevolenski V. (2020) Subnational Variations in Government-Nonprofit Relations: A Comparative Analysis of Regional Differences within Russia. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 22(1): 47–65.

Toepler S., Fröhlich C. (2020) Advocacy in authoritarian contexts: the case of disability NGOs in Russia. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(11-12): 1473-1489.

Tulaeva C. (2010) Gosudarstvennoe i negosudarstvennoe regulirovanie v rossijskom lesnom sektore: konfrontaciya ili sotrudnichestvo? (na primere vnedreniya sertifikacii FSC v Rossii). [Governmental and nongovernmental regulation in Russian forestry sector: confrontation or cooperation?] Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 4: 112–126 (in Russian).

Tysiachniouk M., Tulaeva S., Henry L.A. (2018) Civil Society under the Law ‘On Foreign Agents’: NGO Strategies and Network Transformation. Europe-Asia Studies, 70(4): 615–637.

Weber M. (1996) Osnovnye sociologicheskie ponyatiya [General sociological terms]. In: Dobren'kov V.I. (ed.) Zapadno-Evropejskaya sociologiya XIX-nachala XX vekov [Western-European sociology of XIX — beginning of XX centuries]. Moscow: Izd-vo Mezhdunarodnogo un-ta biznesa i upravleniya: 455–491 (in Russian).

Weber M. (2016) Khozyaystvo i obshchestvo: ocherki ponimayushchey sotsiologii [Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology]: V 4-h t. T. 1. Sociologiya [Sociology]. Moscow: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki (in Russian).

Zabolotnaya G.M., Larionov A.V. (2017) Regional'nye praktiki institucionalizacii negosudarstvennyh postavshchikov social'nyh uslug [Regional practices of institualization of nongovernmental providers of social services]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal'nogo upravleniya [Issues of state and municipal management], 3: 72–91 (in Russian).