Article Information

CORRUPTION AND ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY PERCEPTION IN RUSSIANS’ MASS CONSCIOUSNESS

Sergey M. EliseevaEkaterina A. Kovtunb,
Sergey D. Savinb (ssd_sav@mail.ru)

aAutonomous non-profit higher education organization «University associated with the Interparliamentary Assembly of the Eurasian Economic Community», Saint Petersburg, Russia

bSaint Petersburg University, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Citation: Eliseev S., Kovtun E., Savin S. (2020) Corruption and anti-corruption policy perception in Russians’ mass consciousness. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 23(5): 178–194. https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2020.23.5.7

Abstract. The anti-corruption policy cannot be effective if a society has a high tolerance rate toward corruption, and authorities have no clear and consequent anti-corruption strategy. A systematic analysis of corruption as a social phenomenon suggests not only the study of political, legal, socio-economic, cultural and historical aspects of corruption but also the study of its perception in mass consciousness. The research on the official anti-corruption policy and evaluation of its effectiveness in mass consciousness allows for the more effective anti-corruption strategy to develop in a society. This article offers some results from the sociological research on the perception of corruption and anti-corruption policy in Russian mass consciousness. This research has been carried out by the scholars from St. Petersburg University using a telephone survey in 2014-2018. The main goal here was to describe dominant stereotypes in the corruption and anti-corruption policy perception which are typical in the Russian mass consciousness. The empirical research results are indicative of a lack of significant changes in social consciousness regarding corruption in the last decade. There is an obvious contradiction between abstract and personal levels of corruption perception. Corruption in mass consciousness has been perceived as a social evil on an abstract level, but on a personal one as a functional necessity to settle private issues.

Key words: corruption, anti-corruption policy, mass consciousness, attitudes, behavior model.

References

Devyatkin A.A. (1999) Yavlenie sotsial'noi ustanovki v psikhologii XX veka [Social attitude as a phenomenon in 21 century psychology]. Kaliningrad: KSU (in Russian).

Dungan J., Waytz A. Young L. (2014) Corruption in the Context of Moral Trade-offs. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 26(1-2): 97-118.

Friedrich C.J. (2005) Corruption in Historical Perspective. In: Heidenheimer A.J., Johnston M. (eds.) Political Corruption: concepts and contexts. Third Edition. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers: 15-24.

Ghatak A., Iyengar S. Corruption Breeds Corruption. Studies in Microeconomics, 2(1): 121-132.

Kirpichnikov A.I. (1997) Vzyatka i korruptsiya v Rossii [Bribe and corruption in Russia]. St. Petersburg: Alfa (in Russian).

La Piere (1934) Attitudes vs Actions. Social Forces, 13(2): 230-237.

Мartynov М.Y., Gaberkorn A.I. (2017) Osobennosti vospriyatiya rossiyanami korruptsii [Features of mass consciousness perception of corruption in Russia]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 6: 79-84 (in Russian).

Menshenina N.N. (ed.) (2014) Korrupciya v Rossijskoj Federacii: genezis, formy, tekhnologii, protivodejstvie [Corruption in the Russian Federation: Genesis, forms, technologies, anti-corruption]. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel'stvo Ural'skogo universiteta  (in Russian).

Nisnevich Y.A. (2016) Korruptsiya: instrumental'naya kontseptualizatsiya [Corruption: instrumental conceptualization]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 5: 61-68 (in Russian).

Olken B. (2009) Corruption perceptions vs. corruption reality.  Journal of Public Economics, 93(7-8): 950-964.

Park H., Lee J. (2017) The influence of media, positive perception, and identification on survey-based measures of corruption. Business Ethics: A European Review 26(3): 312-320.

Rose-Ackerman S. (1999) Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rossiya i korruptsiya: kto kogo. Analiticheskii doklad [Russia and corruption: Who beats who. An analytical report] (1998) Indem Foundation [http://www.indem.ru/indemfond/indfp2_r.html ] (accessed 29 December 2018) (in Russian).

Satarov G.A. (2013) Rossiiskaya korruptsiya: uroven', struktura, dinamika. Opyty sotsiologicheskogo analiza [Corruption in Russia: rate, structure, dynamics. A sociological analysis]. Moscow: Fond «Liberal'naya missiya» (in Russian).

Solomon P.H.Jr., Gadowska K. (2018) Legal change in post-communist states: Contradictions and explanations. Introduction. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 51(3): 173-176.

Thomas W., Znaniecki F. (1927) The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Vol. 1. Second edition. New York: Alfred A Knopf.

Yadov V.A. (1979) Samoregulyatsiya i prognozirovanie sotsial'nogo povedeniya lichnosti [Self-regulation and forecasting social behavior of an individual]. Leningrad: Nauka (in Russian).

Zadorin I.V., Matskevich M.G. (2017) Obshchestvennoe vospriyatie vozmozhnykh izmenenii v ugolovnom pravosudii: rezul'taty sotsial'no-psikhologicheskogo eksperimenta [Public perception of possible changes in the criminal justice: Results of social and psychological experiment], Zircon Research group [http://www.zircon.ru/upload/iblock/8bc/pravosudie_tezisy_Kovalevskie_cht... ] (accessed 29 December 2018) (in Russian).

Zhuravlev A.L., Yurevich A.V. (2014) Psikhologicheskie faktory korruptsii [Psychological factors of corruption]. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 7: 63-71 (in Russian).