Article Information


Viacheslav Deygraf (

European University at St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russia

Citation: Deygraf V. (2017) Vozvrashcheniye gendernogo displeya i naturalizatsiya tela v sorevnovatel'nom bodibildinge. [The Return of the gender display and body naturalization in competitive bodybuilding]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 2017, 20(3): 136–160 (in Russian).

Full Text (PDF)

Abstract. The article presents the results of a study on gender display analysis in competitive bodybuilding. The study based on observation of bodybuilding competitions in St. Petersburg from October 13 to October 15 in 2016 and an analysis of the rules of the Federation for Bodybuilding and Fitness of Russia. Bodybuilding competitions are "a contest for the best physique achieved by athletics", however, in the rules of the competition there are certain femininity criteria for women and masculinity for men. In 2011 and 2012, the categories of "women's Bikini-Fitness" for women and "men’s physique" for men were emerged. These nominations include a more explicit demonstration of the gender display during the competition. In Russia from 2014 to 2016 the number of participants in these categories in the Russian championship has grown more than 3 times. The aim of the study is to analyze how changes in body images take place in competitive bodybuilding and how this can be explained. According to the results of the research, new nominations are in demand, because they bring in a more explicit presentation of the gender display on the stage of the competition. While in other categories such presentation was minimized. Also, these nominations mean more "natural" and physically healthy body models that the athletes want to match.

Keywords: gender display, gender frame, sociology of sport, sociology of body, sociology of gender, bodybuilding, fitness.


Bartky S.F. (1988). Femininity and the modernization of patriarchal power. In: I. Diamond & L. Quinby (eds.), Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on Resistance: 61-86.

Berdysheva E. (2014) The Social Construction of quality in the Moscow market of dental services. Economic sociology, 15(5): 9-44.

Krupets Y., Nartova N. (2014). "Thin means normal": the management of the body among urban youth. Journal of Social Policy Research, 12(4): 523-538.

Schwarzenegger A. In: Encyclopedia of modern bodybuilding. In three volumes. Volume 1. M: Physical Culture and Sports, 1993.

Zdravomyslova E.A., & Temkina A.A. (2015). 12 lectures on gender sociology: a textbook. Publishing house of the European University at St. Petersburg.

Andreasson J., Johansson T. (2013). Female Fitness in the Blogosphere: Gender, Health, and the Body. SAGE Open3(July-September), 1-10.

Bolin A. (1998). Muscularity and Femininity: Women bodybuilders and women's bodies in culturo-historical context. Fitness as cultural phenomenon, 187-212.

Boyle L. (2005). Flexing the tensions of female muscularity: How female bodybuilders negotiate normative femininity in competitive bodybuilding. Women's Studies Quarterly, 33(1/2), 134-149.

Bridges T.S. (2009). Gender capital and male bodybuilders. Body & Society15(1), 83-107.

Burke P. (2001). Eyewitnessing. The Uses of Images as Historical Evidence. L., Reaktion.

Butler J. (1993). Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. London: Routledge.

Chananie-Hill R.A., McGrath S.A., & Stoll J. (2012). Deviant or normal? Female bodybuilders' accounts of social reactions. Deviant Behavior, 33(10), 811-830.

Chimot C., Louveau C. (2010). Becoming a man while playing a female sport: The construction of masculine identity in boys doing rhythmic gymnastics. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 45(4), 436-456.

Choi P.Y. (2003). Muscle matters: Maintaining visible differences between women and men. Sexualities, Evolution & Gender, 5(2), 71-81.

Connell R.W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford University Press.

Connell R.W. (2000). The Men and the Boys. University of California Press.

Connell R.W. (1993). The big picture: Masculinities in recent world history. Theory and society, 22(5), 597-623.

Dutton K.R., Laura R.S. (1989). Towards a history of bodybuilding. Sporting traditions, 6(1), 25-41.

Goffman E. (1987). Gender Advertisements. N.Y.: Harper Torchbooks.

Heywood L. (1998). Bodymakers: A cultural anatomy of women's body building. Rutgers University Press.

Johnston L. (1996). Flexing femininity: Female body-builders refiguring'the body'. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography3(3), 327-340.

Ndalianis A. (1995). Muscle, Excess & Rupture: Female bodybuilding & gender construction. Media Information Australia, 75(1), 13-23.

Obel C. (1996). Collapsing gender in competitive bodybuilding: researching contradictions and ambiguity in sport. International review for the sociology of sport, 31(2), 185-202.

Pfister G. (2010). Women in sport–gender relations and future perspectives. Sport in Society, 13(2), 234-248.

Ridgeway C.L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. Oxford University Press.

Ridgeway C.L., & Correll S.J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & society, 18(4), 510-531.

Saltman K.J. (2003). The strong arm of the law. Body & Society, 9(4), 49-67.

Shilling C., & Bunsell T. (2009). The female bodybuilder as a gender outlaw. Qualitative research in sport and exercise, 1(2), 141-159.

Stokvis R. (2006). The emancipation of bodybuilding. Sport in Society, 9(3), 463-479.

Vertinsky P. (1999). Making and marking gender: Bodybuilding and the medicalization of the body from one century's end to another. Culture, Sport, Society, 2(1), 1-24.