Article Imformation


Zhanna Chernova a (E-mail:

Meri Kulmala b

a Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg, Russia

b Aleksanteri Institute, University of Helsinki, Finland

Citation: Chernova Zh., Kulmala M. (2018) “Po slozhnosti — eto rabota, po sostoyaniyu dushi — sem'ya”: professionalizatsiya priyemnogo roditel'stva v sovremennoy Rossii [“In its complexity it’s work, in its soul it’s family”: professionalization of foster parenting in contemporary Russia]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 21(3): 46–70 (in Russian).

Full Text (PDF)

Abstract. This article is a sociological investigation of the concept of care, particularly in terms of professionalization of (parental) care. The aim of the article is to analyze how foster parents who live in children's villages make sense of their parenting activities for themselves. Sociological conceptualization of care serve as the theoretical framework for our research, which allows us to answer questions, such as: what is care as an activity; who is supposed to provide mundane care; what is the locus of care; what kind of an institutional logic and cultural models of justification it is connected with. Our analysis is based on the empirical research in five children’s villages in which we conducted focus groups with foster parents living in those children's villages (family campuses) and three semi-structured thematic interviews with foster parents which all were recorded and transcribed.

Due to ”deficit of care”, a problem characteristic to modern societies, there is growing interest in sociological analysis of care. The global trend towards professionalization of care in general and professionalization of parenting in particular makes it possible to consider care as a particular kind of activity, which requires special skills and knowledge from the performer of care activity. This activity is beyond the private sphere and it can be performed by a number of actors: family, the state, the market and/or the third sector. Foster parenting is a good example of how the global trend of the professionalization of care is applied in a local context under the conditions structured by the deinstitutionalization policy of care for children left without parental care and by the particular environment of living, namely a children's village.

The children's village — collective living of foster families — is understood in this article as a particular regime of care, which consists of the following elements of care: ideals of care, its institutional setting and concrete caring practices. Children's villages are a form of long-term upbringing of children left without parental care orphans. This particular form is based on the ideal of care in family opposed to institutionalized form of care (orphanage).

The key difference of a children's village from other forms of care for this category of children is its very special spatial locus and social structure, intensive presence of foster parent community and special features related to foster parents themselves (such as the length of experience in foster parenting and in raising such children that face difficulties to be place in “ordinary” foster families, specialization of caring certain categories of children).

The studied foster parents problematize the performed care by perceiving their activity through a tension which can be viewed as a love-work dichotomy. Their understanding of caring as love over the foster children in their families can be categorized as moral conducts and mission calling. These leads to a certain system of interpretations over foster parenting and the logic of practicing parenthood and concrete parenting practices. The professionalization of foster parenting is perceived as formalization and increasing bureaucratic control and thus as a loss of autonomy of a family. Understanding of care over foster children as work in turn allows foster parents to rationalize their activities and to question the official status of a foster parent in Russian society. Professionalization of foster parenting serves as a way to address a number of problems that parents face, attitude changes toward fostering and increasing the status of care in general.

Keywords: foster parenting, professionalization, care, care regime, deinstitualization



Bogdanova E. (2017) Russian SOS Children’s Villages and Deinstitutionalisation Reform: Balancing between Institutional and Family Care. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 15(3), 395–406.–0634–2017–15–3–395–406

Chernova Zh. (2011) Kto, o kom i na kakikh usloviyakh dolzhen zabotit'sya? Gendernyy analiz rezhimov zaboty i sotsial'noy politiki [Who should care for whom and under which conditions? Gender analysis of care regimes and family policy]. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsial'noy politiki [The Journal of Social Policy Studies], 9(3): 295–318 (in Russian).

Chernova Zh. (2013) Sem'ya kak politicheskiy vopros: gosudarstvennyy proyekt i praktiki privatnosti [Family as political question. State project and private practices]. Saint-Petersburg: EUSP Press (in Russian).

Chernova Z., Shpakovskaya L. (2016) Professionalizatsiya roditel’stva: mezhdu ekspertnym i obydennym znaniem [The Professionalization of Parenthood: Between Common Sense and Expert Knowledge]. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsial’noy politiki [The Journal of Social Policy Studies], 14(4): 521–534 (in Russian).

Daly M. (2002) Care as a Good in Social Policy. Journal of Social Policy, 31: 251–270.

Daly M., Lewis J. (2000) The concept of Social Care and the Analysis of Contemporary Welfare States. British Journal of Sociology, 51(2): 251–270.

Fine M. (2007) Caring Society? Care and the Dilemmas of Human Service in the 21st Century. Houndmills: Palgrave.

Finch J., Groves D. (ed.) (1983) A Labour of Love: Women, Work, and Caring. London; Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Folbre N. (2001) The Invisible Heart: Economics and Family Values. New York: New Press.

Giddens E. (2004) Transformatsiya intimnosti [The Transformation of Intimacy]. St. Petersburg: Piter (in Russian).

Hochschild A. (1989) The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home (with Anne Machiung). New York: Viking.

Hochschild A. R. (2003) The Commercialization of Intimate Life: Notes from Home and Work. San Francisco; Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Kremer M. (2006) The Politics of Ideals of Care: Danish and Flemish Child Care Policy Compared. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 13(2): 261–285.

Kulmala M., Rasell, M., & Chernova, Z. (2017). Overhauling Russia’s Child Welfare system: Institutional and Ideational Factors behind the Paradigm Shift. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 15(3): 353–366.–0634–2017–15–3–353–366

Lovtsova N. (2005) Professionalizatsiya roditel'stva: politika, teoriya i praktika [Professionalization of parenthood: policy, theory and practice]. Antropologiya professiy [Anthropology of professions] Ed. by P. Romanov, E. Iarskaia-Smirnova. Saratov: 432–460 (in Russian).

Noddings N. (2002) Starting at Home. Caring and Social Policy. Berkeley: Univ. Press.

Rummery K., Fine M., (2012) Care: A Critical Review of Theory, Policy and Practices. Social policy and administration, 46(3): 321–343.

Simonova O. (2013) Emotsional'nyy trud v sovremennom obshchestve nauchnyye diskussii i dal'neyshaya kontseptualizatsiya idey A. R. Khokhshil’d [Emotional work in contemporary society, scientific discussions and further conceptualization of ideas A. Hochschild]. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsial'noy politiki [The Journal of Social Policy Studies], 11(3): 339–354 (in Russian).

Ungerson C. (2005) Care, work and feeling. The Sociological Review, 53:188–203.

Zdravomyslova Е., Temkina А. (2015) 12 lektsiy po gendernoy sotsiologii: uchebnoye posobiye [12 Lectures on gender sociology]. St. Petersburg: EUSP Press (in Russian).